For decades, people have urged me, pushed me, prodded me, practically peeled off my skin, pulled out my eyes, and yanked out my brain to prove it, i.e. show them the data, the results, the books, manuals, pamphlets, journals, monographs, voice and video recordings, all the resources I have used to make the statements I do about the Brzezinski Cartel and the Rothschilds.

On the evening of St. Patrick’s Day 2010, I feel now is the time . . . but with a twist.

The list below shows 165 different ways how The First Sphere of Influence (Rothschilds and Brzezinski Cartel) controls the world. One hundred and sixty-five reasons to believe what I say to be 100% accurate and true.

Each entry is a separate and distinct central bank, located in a separate and distinct part of the world. These central banks cover the globe and know absolutely no boundaries, effectively erasing borders between even sworn enemies.

The BIS (pronounced BIZZ) is the Rothschild’s piggy bank, a veritable deep-pit mine, the equivalent of quadrillions of dollars.

quadrillion quad·ril’lion adj.

1. The cardinal number equal to 10¹⁵.
2. Chiefly British. Septillion.

What’s the significance of having a central bank within a country and why should you concern yourself, your family and colleagues?

Central banks are illegally created PRIVATE banks that are owned by the Rothschild banking family. The family has been around for more than 230 years and has slithered its way into each country on this planet, threatened every world leader and their governments and cabinets with physical and economic death and destruction, and then emplaced their own people in these central banks to control and manage each country’s pocketbook. Worse, the Rothschilds also control the machinations of each government at the macro level, not concerning themselves with the daily vicissitudes of our individual personal lives. Except when we get too far out of line.

The grand plan of The First Sphere of Influence is to create a global mononation. Please do not confuse this with the term globalization. Mononation and globalization couldn’t be more different in concept, scope and purpose. Mononation is one state. It has one government. One set of laws for all ordinary citizens, no laws for the elite. Globalization refers to communicating, trading, interacting, etc. among separate, different, independent, sovereign countries.

The grand plan of The First Sphere of Influence is to create a global mononation.

Our own Federal Reserve is an illegally emplaced private bank that is directly responsible for creating all the US’s depressions, recessions, and the inflation and deflation of our dollar. The Fed controls the printing of our own currency, and then charges the US government interest on those loans. The interest is growing each year, making it difficult if not impossible for our government to pay it. How do we pay this interest? By the US Personal Income Tax. This tax goes to the Rothschild family.

In the coming months, as I continue to gather intel and write a book about The First Sphere of Influence, I will share more and more. For now, I kindly ask that you read each of the 165 lines below. One hundred and sixty-five reasons to believe my intel. You can click on each bank and visit its website. I’ve seen each one. They’re real. And they’re one of the reasons why each country is in such deep debt to this insidious family, the Rothschilds.

By the way, if you’re curious what the US debt is to the BIS, please refer to the table at the end of this article, taken from the latest statistical results provided by the Joint External Debt Hub, which receives data from the BIS, International Monetary Fund, World Bank, and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

BIS Offices

Representative Office for Asia and the Pacific
78th floor, Two International Finance Centre
8 Finance Street, Central
Hong Kong
Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China
Telephone: (+852) 2878 7100
Fax: (+852) 2878 7123

Representative Office for the Americas
Torre Chapultepec
Rubén Darío 281 – 17th floor
Col. Bosque de Chapultepec
Del. Miguel Hidalgo
11580 México, D.F.
México
Telephone: (+52) 55 91380290
Fax: (+52) 55 91380299

The Central Banks of the World

Afghanistan: Bank of Afghanistan
Albania: Bank of Albania
Algeria: Bank of Algeria
Argentina: Central Bank of Argentina
Armenia: Central Bank of Armenia
Aruba: Central Bank of Aruba
Australia: Reserve Bank of Australia
Austria: Austrian National Bank
Azerbaijan: Central Bank of Azerbaijan Republic
Bahamas: Central Bank of The Bahamas
Bahrain: Central Bank of Bahrain
Bangladesh: Bangladesh Bank
Barbados: Central Bank of Barbados
Belarus: National Bank of the Republic of Belarus
Belgium: National Bank of Belgium
Belize: Central Bank of Belize
Benin: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Bermuda: Bermuda Monetary Authority
Bhutan: Royal Monetary Authority of Bhutan
Bolivia: Central Bank of Bolivia
Bosnia: Central Bank of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana: Bank of Botswana
Brazil: Central Bank of Brazil
Bulgaria: Bulgarian National Bank
Burkina Faso: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Burundi: Bank of the Republic of Burundi
Cambodia: National Bank of Cambodia
Cameroon: Bank of Central African States
Canada: Bank of Canada - Banque du Canada
Cayman Islands: Cayman Islands Monetary Authority
Central African Republic: Bank of Central African States
Chad: Bank of Central African States
Chile: Central Bank of Chile
China: The People’s Bank of China
Colombia: Bank of the Republic
Comoros: Central Bank of Comoros
Congo: Bank of Central African States
Costa Rica: Central Bank of Costa Rica
Côte d’Ivoire: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Croatia: Croatian National Bank
Cuba: Central Bank of Cuba
Cyprus: Central Bank of Cyprus
Czech Republic: Czech National Bank
Denmark: National Bank of Denmark
Dominican Republic: Central Bank of the Dominican Republic
East Caribbean area: Eastern Caribbean Central Bank
Ecuador: Central Bank of Ecuador
Egypt: Central Bank of Egypt
El Salvador: Central Reserve Bank of El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea: Bank of Central African States
Estonia: Bank of Estonia
Ethiopia: National Bank of Ethiopia
European Union: European Central Bank
Fiji: Reserve Bank of Fiji
Finland: Bank of Finland
France: Bank of France
Gabon: Bank of Central African States
The Gambia: Central Bank of The Gambia
Georgia: National Bank of Georgia
Germany: Deutsche Bundesbank
Ghana: Bank of Ghana
Greece: Bank of Greece
Guatemala: Bank of Guatemala
Guinea Bissau: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Guyana: Bank of Guyana
Haiti: Central Bank of Haiti
Honduras: Central Bank of Honduras
Hong Kong: Hong Kong Monetary Authority
Hungary: Magyar Nemzeti Bank
Iceland: Central Bank of Iceland
India: Reserve Bank of India
Indonesia: Bank Indonesia
Iran: The Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran
Iraq: Central Bank of Iraq
Ireland: Central Bank and Financial Services Authority of Ireland
Israel: Bank of Israel
Italy: Bank of Italy
Jamaica: Bank of Jamaica
Japan: Bank of Japan
Jordan: Central Bank of Jordan
Kazakhstan: National Bank of Kazakhstan
Kenya: Central Bank of Kenya
Korea: Bank of Korea
Kuwait: Central Bank of Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan: National Bank of the Kyrgyz Republic
Latvia: Bank of Latvia
Lebanon: Central Bank of Lebanon
Lesotho: Central Bank of Lesotho
Libya: Central Bank of Libya
Lithuania: Bank of Lithuania
Luxembourg: Central Bank of Luxembourg
Macao: Monetary Authority of Macao
Macedonia: National Bank of the Republic of Macedonia
Madagascar: Central Bank of Madagascar
Malawi: Reserve Bank of Malawi
Malaysia: Central Bank of Malaysia
Mali: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Malta: Central Bank of Malta
Mauritius: Bank of Mauritius
Mexico: Bank of Mexico
Moldova: National Bank of Moldova
Mongolia: Bank of Mongolia
Montenegro: Central Bank of Montenegro
Morocco: Bank of Morocco
Mozambique: Bank of Mozambique
Namibia: Bank of Namibia
Nepal: Central Bank of Nepal
Netherlands: Netherlands Bank
Netherlands Antilles: Bank of the Netherlands Antilles
New Zealand: Reserve Bank of New Zealand
Nicaragua: Central Bank of Nicaragua
Niger: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Nigeria: Central Bank of Nigeria
Norway: Central Bank of Norway
Oman: Central Bank of Oman
Pakistan: State Bank of Pakistan
Papua New Guinea: Bank of Papua New Guinea
Paraguay: Central Bank of Paraguay
Peru: Central Reserve Bank of Peru
Philippines: Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas
Poland: National Bank of Poland
Portugal: Bank of Portugal
Qatar: Qatar Central Bank
Romania: National Bank of Romania
Russia: Central Bank of Russia
Rwanda: National Bank of Rwanda
San Marino: Central Bank of the Republic of San Marino
Samoa: Central Bank of Samoa
Saudi Arabia: Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency
Senegal: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Serbia: National Bank of Serbia
Seychelles: Central Bank of Seychelles
Sierra Leone: Bank of Sierra Leone
Singapore: Monetary Authority of Singapore
Slovakia: National Bank of Slovakia
Slovenia: Bank of Slovenia
Solomon Islands: Central Bank of Solomon Islands
South Africa: South African Reserve Bank
Spain: Bank of Spain
Sri Lanka: Central Bank of Sri Lanka
Sudan: Bank of Sudan
Surinam: Central Bank of Suriname
Swaziland: The Central Bank of Swaziland
Sweden: Sveriges Riksbank
Switzerland: Swiss National Bank
Tajikistan: National Bank of Tajikistan
Tanzania: Bank of Tanzania
Thailand: Bank of Thailand
Togo: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Tonga: National Reserve Bank of Tonga
Trinidad and Tobago: Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia: Central Bank of Tunisia
Turkey: Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey
Uganda: Bank of Uganda
Ukraine: National Bank of Ukraine
United Arab Emirates: Central Bank of United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom: Bank of England
United States: The Dirty Nasty Stinky Fed, Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Uruguay: Central Bank of Uruguay
Vanuatu: Reserve Bank of Vanuatu
Venezuela: Central Bank of Venezuela
Vietnam: The State Bank of Vietnam
Yemen: Central Bank of Yemen
Zambia: Bank of Zambia
Zimbabwe: Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe

(in Millions US$)

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

Here’s the last public interview with Jeffersonian Patriot, Aaron Russo, produced by Alex Jones. If you’ve not seen Mr. Russo’s groundbreaking film, America: Freedom to Fascism, please buy it right away, see it with your family and friends, and spread the word.

Mr. Russo’s film reveals the lies of the IRS, Federal Reserve, and some of the major US bankers who answer to The First Sphere of Influence, the Brzezinksi Cartel and the evil Rothschilds. A spoiler: Mr. Russo discusses his friendship with Nick Rockefeller, who told Mr. Russo of the false-flag attacks on 9/11, the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, that we would be hunting in caves for Osama bin Laden. The eerie part is that Rockefeller told Mr. Russo of these events almost a year before 9/11 even happened. Mr. Russo then shares with us something deeply sinister about Rockefeller and The First Sphere of Influence: the formation of a New World Order and establishment of a Communist Manifesto.

Candid . . . riveting . . . and deeply saddening. Take 95 minutes of your hard-earned day and watch this interview.

“We’re dealing with complete evil. . . .”     —Aaron Russo

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

Eleanor Roosevelt

“We have a habit in our house of always drinking a toast on Thanksgiving Day and New Year’s Day first of all to the United States of America. For on these days of good wishes for one’s family and friends one must wish before anything else for everything that is good for one’s country as a whole. If things do not go well for one’s country, then it will be impossible for things to go well for our families, for ourselves, or for our friends.

So, uppermost in our minds on Thanksgiving Day, 1959, are thoughts of our President visiting many foreign lands and we are wishing him good luck on his journey and may it serve the good of our country and the peace of the world.

One other custom in our house is to drink a toast to all relatives and friends, near and far, who are not able to be with us on Thanksgiving Day. Some have left us for better worlds. Others are far away and not able to join us.

Then we toast each other, down to the youngest child present.

On Thanksgiving Day I always try very hard, too, to have someone read one of the Thanksgiving proclamations. But in this I do not always succeed, for there is always a decided anxiety on the part of most to sit themselves down and eat of the turkey.

We can be thankful, I think, this year that another year has gone by and we are still at peace. In fact, I think we have more hope for permanent peace, and more is being said about achieving total disarmament and building a world legal system that would replace the use of force than I have heard in years gone by. For this, I am thankful.

I believe the peoples of the world can live together in peace if only their leaders will really mean what they say and make compromises that will ensure peace for the world. I am not one who thinks peace will come easily or without sacrifices on everybody’s part, but it is worth any amount of sacrifice, and the ability to live together is worth the sacrifices it takes to reach a cooperative state of mind.

The one thing that we are not thankful for at this season is the amount of dishonesty that is being discovered both in public and in private groups. So, let us pray that a year from now we can feel that everywhere our people will have come to regard their public and private interests with a greater sense of responsibility.”     —Eleanor Roosevelt

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

Albert Einstein

This short is for all those mediocre people who oppose positive change. Everywhere you look, you’ll find them: the meek, the fearful, the cowardly who, in some passive-aggressive way, undermine the truly good things that so few people do nowadays.

The substance of Einstein’s words will be consciously lost on these weak-minded souls, but somehow it will diffuse into their subconscious and find a comfortable resting place. In the midst of publishing the accurate truth about The First Sphere of Influence, I feel we should study this quote and keep it on a front burner, ever mindful of the consequences of ignoring the meaning behind it.

In a personal letter to Dr. Morris Raphael Cohen, Professor Emeritus of Philosophy, College of the City of New York, Einstein defends the appointment of Bertrand Russell to a teaching position, March 19, 1940:

“Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds. The mediocre mind is incapable of understanding the man who refuses to bow blindly to conventional prejudices and chooses instead to express his opinions courageously and honestly.”     –Albert Einstein

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

Upgraded body armor. Cool, the little crab mused.

Village boys threw it scraps of shark and squid, and watched the crab scamper many feet up and over and under the rocks to retrieve the offerings, some of which were larger than the crab, but it didn’t mind. It simply minced it up into bite-sized portions and went back to the receiving area for more.

After getting a morsel from the boys, the crab blew saltine bubbles into the moist air, using its numerous mouth parts and bellowslike stomach. A light and delicate melodic sound wafted off the crab, but you could only hear it if you were nearby. The boys, sitting only a few feet away, giggled in Spanish. The crab was grateful for the boys’ sharing their wealth, but more for their having a very short attention span—they enjoyed making the crab scamper long distances for the tidbits and it winded the little crab. Still, you never knew when food was going to walk by, so you had to catch it when you could. Evolution’s cruel facts were burned deeply into the crab.

When the boys had run out of food, the crab then spent a few long minutes nibbling on the bacterial crop covering the rocks. Sated, the crab dipped its rear legs into the water, sampling for telltale signs of predators, and made the daily belly flop onto the surface. The crab quickly sank beneath the azure sea and, using its rear swimming legs, paddled for the safety of its burrow, several feet below. Excellent at navigating the various perils and surprises of the small reef, the crab landed safely, and quickly began its ritual inspection of the cavernous apartment.

The crab had painstakingly dug out the burrow, piled the trash just outside the entrance, where the next whoosh of ocean current carried it away, and unceremoniously evicted several unwanted settlers.

Git lost, you varmints! the crab thought.

Only the tiny, rainbow-colored cleaner wrasse was escorted out peacefully. They both aimed to preserve the necessitous diplomacy struck by the crab only last week. On laundry days, the crab sat just outside its hole, waved its chelipeds briefly, summoning the wrasse, which then picked off the microscopic creatures that invaded the crab’s carapace.

Following a thorough investigation of the premises, the crab then returned to the entrance and sat on the door step, watching the neighborhood. The big orange ball betrayed the presence of a danger looming above. The crab, pretendedly unconcerned, waved a cheliped several times, and the rainbow wrasse appeared.

* * * * *

The Shadow slid tactically toward the crab, its owner hovering several feet overhead. The elongate body drifted with the push-pull of the prevailing medium. Angling its torpedo head side to side, the shadow inspected its lunch. Small but still a mouthful to the young hunter. Well worth the usual, two-minute wait outside a typical Crunchy Critter’s territory. It calculated the strike distance and dive angle, allowing just enough wiggle room to maneuver several inches in any direction along the sand, should the Luckless Lunch’s many legs make for the oceanic freeway. The Shadow anchored its tail, trailing four feet behind, in a small crevice among several large rocks, and waited with the patience of Job.

Who’s Job? The crab thought.

* * * * *

Extending its long stalks, eyes high atop the little periscopes, the crab scanned the sand floor, mindful of the slender, ominous cloud under the big orange ball. More than a million years of evolution, trial and error, life and agonizing death were programmed into the crab’s tiny brain, a mere cluster of neurons under a delicate, calcareous coat.

Life was simple for the crab: clean out its sand-filled habitat, a perpetual chore, forage for food several times a day, look for a suitable mate before it dried up into a dessicated mass of anything but shell, and avoid the mischievous moray eel.

The Horribly Inept Eel lived under the two gigantic rocks just under the surface. That careless, pesky punk of a creature that had desperately wanted the crab for breakfast, lunch and dinner—ever since the young arthropod had flown down from the water column months ago, morphed and molted a few times, and then grew large enough to be seen by His Nearsightedness.

The crab knew of the moray’s everyday habits. It had spied on the Slimy Nothing for hours, watching it chase small reef fish and other crab cousins around the settlement. And catch nothing but the warm, tropical amniotic fluid that bathed the crab and its neighbors. Weeks ago, the crab decided the Slippery Zero lacked the patience and basic mathematical skills to be an effective predator.

Spending no more than two minutes outside the den of a potential meal, then missing your intended targets time after time won’t cut it, thought the crab.

After an unsuccessful attempt, the Obnoxious Squish would simply move on to a different hole, never considering its errors in direction, distance and timing. The only way it had fed itself recently was to steal lobster from the morays next door. But they now ate their munchies in stealth. The Lean Slosh was becoming desperate.

The crab decided the moray wasn’t just nearsighted. The Slithery Meanness was painfully dyslexic. Either way, the moray posed only a low-level threat to the crab, and would be treated accordingly.

Now careless and presumptuous, the Shadow ogled the juicy dish below. He called up the calculation he’d made on the strike distance and dive angle and contemplated a wishful outcome: crab du jour. The shadow had no choice. Hunger for live meat replaced all logic, short as it was. The Shadow cocked its serpentine head skyward, released its tail from the grip of the rocks, and, mouth agape, made a well-aimed, screaming dive for the little crab.

The wrasse sensed it first, using its keen lateral line that detected the displacement of individual water molecules. In the span of a dozen or so milliseconds, the wrasse discovered that a few million water molecules too many had been dislodged from their quietude. Reflexively, in a silent scream, the Little Rainbow coughed up a mouthful of tiny creatures it had plucked from the crab and fled in an instant, leaving a tawny cloud of sand, detritus and a few loose scales. Not to mention a startled crab with only half its laundry done.

Fine sensory hairs on the crab’s antennae were bent sideways under the tsunamic bow wave of the oncoming Shadow-Missile, sounding a million-year-old klaxon. All eight legs and both chelipeds resembled a multi-blade circular saw at ten thousand rpm, separating the countryside into two equal halves. In a screaming movement of blur, the crab dived into a neighboring escape hole, dug six inches deeper than its own.

Eyes pulled backward a millisecond before it hit the sand, the Rummaging Shadow quickly discovered that the soft sea floor had only a foot of cushion to assuage the violent collision. Everything else below was a mystery that would reveal itself all too soon. By the time the moray’s momentum disappeared, it had propelled the Impetuous Rocket a full foot and a half under the floor.

When the surrounding mud, having been deformed by the impact of the moray’s carcass, returned to its original configuration, it formed a water-tight suction seal over the cranium of the Sinusoidal Terrorist, locking it inexorably into place. Stunned by its minor miscalculation, the moray lay motionless on the sandy bottom, an occasional flicking of its tail proclaiming life.

Pushed sideways several inches by the impact, the crab reached out a cheliped and, to its delight, discovered soft, pliable flesh. The crab was sharing space with its nemesis. Knowing the moray would slither its way out soon, the crab quickly prepared for the banquet. It tore out bits of tender meat from the captive Sea-Cobra and packed its stomach full. The moray flinched only slightly as the crab feasted and dismantled it piece by piece. Quickly, the crab climbed along the moray’s fusiform body to the entrance of his escape chamber. . . .

The moray’s tail undulated in the water, slowly at first. Then frantically, as a bolus of grim reality and adrenaline shot through every cell like a bolt of lightning hitting a gasoline station. Cemented in a world of densely packed mud, the moray slowly realized it was facing a cruel paradox of nature—the predator had become the catch of the day.

The crab turned away from the reef and watched the Leviathan appear from the cobalt-blue deep. It came slowly but purposefully, cutting the tropical surf like a silent blade through warm butter. The long, slender Sea-Wolf homed in on the desperate vibrations emanating from the sand bottom, some twenty feet ahead. After consulting its complex sensory command center, the animal made several final adjustments to its course then, with one powerful kick of its heavily muscled tail, descended. . . .

As the miasma of sand and blood and bits of tissue settled to the floor, the crab saw the small reef shark disappear into the gloom, the moray’s yellow-green tail dangling from its mouth, still writhing in mute protest.

The crab walked over to the entrance to its home, surveying the damage from the terrorist bombing, and began sweeping out the debris. Suddenly, as if slapped by an invisible hand on its crab-face, it reeled its head and scampered downstairs.

Woo-hoo! thought the little crab.

Hundreds of amorous pheromone molecules had bound to delicate sensory receptors on the crab’s antennae, broadcasting the unmistakable presence of the female, crouched in seductive wait at the crab’s back door.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

Passive, low-frequency (~125 KHz) radio-frequency identification (RFID) is offered as the optimum solution to track military weapons and sensitive items. The criteria for selecting a suitable RFID tracking system include: low cost, safety, reliability, longevity, durability, accuracy, precision, security, read distance and read speed. Passive, low-frequency RFID fulfills all these criteria. Alternative RFID technologies—high-frequency, contact memory buttons (CMB), and ultra wideband (UWB)—suffer from several important issues, most notably the lack of security and safety, reliability, accuracy and precision (high-frequency RFID); very high cost, lack of security, and too great a read distance (UWB); high cost, lack of security, poor read distance and speed, and longevity (CMB). We suggest passive, low-frequency RFID as the optimum solution to accurately, reliably and safely identify, track and maintain weapons and sensitive items in the military and other agencies.

BACKGROUND

One of a military’s most difficult challenges is to accurately, reliably and safely identify, track and maintain arms, ammunition and explosives, communications gear, sensitive items and other valuable assets (e.g. personally owned firearms) using automatic identification technology.

Beyond this, a major goal is to improve overall efficiency, especially with asset issue/turn-in; physical security; key/lock control; nightly SDO/SDNCO inspections; and monthly, quarterly and annual serial-number inventories. Additional goals are to reduce human error in manual-data entry and keystroke-data entry, to reduce paper data loss, to prevent asset loss and theft, and to maintain high OPSEC and INFOSEC.

CURRENT CONDITIONS

Weapons and sensitive-items issue/turn-in and inventories are normally done 100% by hand. There’re often-mandatory two-person inventories monthly, quarterly and annually, which normally include 5-10 additional personnel, depending on the size of the unit, and type and volume of inventory.

The inventory time cost is approximately 1,250-2,500 man-days/year. The individual issue and turn-in time cost is approximately five minutes/person per incident. For each typical unit issue and turn-in of about 500 items for a 150-person company, the time cost is approximately 15 hours. This lengthy process is wholly unacceptable, especially during rapid deployments when some special operations units must be wheels-up in less than 12 hours.

Worse still, the error rate for data entry is high with all these processes, asset loss is a continual problem, multiple inventories are often required to correct errors, and historical records and life cycles are often difficult, if not impossible, to generate, much less even reconcile.

Clearly, a solution is needed to accurately, reliably and safely identify, track and maintain weapons and sensitive items in a military and other government agencies. Considering all possible criteria, we offer passive, low-frequency RFID as the optimum solution.

CURRENT TRACKING TECHNOLOGIES

As of early-2010, the majority of military units were still using manual data entry as the primary means to enter any type of data into computers. The error rate is quite high, and often errors are overlooked, leading to further complications down the line that seemingly multiply and diffuse unimpeded and without restrictions. For valuable and sensitive information, this situation is clearly unacceptable.

Bar code is used by some units where there are no environmental stressors to distort, damage or destroy the bar-code tag, i.e. in a static office environment. Unfortunately, bar code does not work in harsh environments, especially in the field where tags are easily damaged.

A small handful of Navy and Army units have adopted the contact memory button (CMB), the limitations of which are becoming evident with time. CMB stores all data on its integrated chip and must be accessed by a touch wand that makes actual physical contact with the tag. Security issues abound here, not to mention the fact that each person who actually holds a touch wand to a tag must exert more-than-normal dexterity and accuracy just to reach and touch each tag. That’s acceptable when reading one or two tags. The situation becomes unsatisfactory when reading hundreds of tags, however.

Only selected units have adopted passive or active high-frequency RFID, mostly via mandate to test the efficacy of using the tags under typical working conditions. Largely, high-frequency tags cannot be read under many of the demanding conditions where RFID tags must be used. Interestingly, none of the Wal-Mart vendors, including Wal-Mart itself are using data from high-frequency RFID tags, because of the very poor read reliability issues encountered in most environments. High-frequency tags that’re buried within a pallet cannot be read. Even those that can be read are being read only 60% of the time. Any tag with moisture, say from condensation or overnight dew, cannot be read. Tags not within line of sight of a controller/reader cannot be read. While no one is going on the record about the increased problems associated with high-frequency RFID system deployments, our sources tell us that, as stated previously, no one is using these data. Worst of all, companies are too embarrassed to go public and state that their multi-million-dollar investments are largely not working as planned.

Active UWB is still in the beginning stages of development, with only a few tags now available for testing and proof-of-concept studies. While UWB is not subject to many of the limitations of high-frequency RFID, it remains a very expensive solution. Tags must contain a battery, which is good for 7-10 years. Batteries fail without cause; all the time. When a battery fails, the tag must be removed by a specialist, the casing must be opened, the battery must be removed, the contacts must be cleaned, a new battery must be inserted (correctly, I might add!), the tag must then be replaced, usually with a strong adhesive. The entire process takes about 30 minutes. For each tag. Multiply this by hundreds, if not thousands, of tags that would be affixed to various weapons, sensitive items, etc. The maintenance cost alone is prohibitive.

The following are all current, prospective or  potential methods of data entry:

• Manual, handwritten data entry
• Manual keystroke entry (1 error/30 keystrokes)
• Bar code (1 error/3 million reads)
• Contact memory button (CMB)
• Passive low-frequency RFID (125-134 KHz)
• Passive high-frequency RFID (900 MHz-3 GHz)
• Active high-frequency RFID (900 MHz-3 GHz)
• Active Ultra Wideband (6 GHz)

PASSIVE, LOW-FREQUENCY RFID COMPARED TO:

Please note that each bullet point describes the performance characteristics of low-frequency RFID, relative to the competition. The advantages of passive, low-frequency RFID are clearly evident in all areas.

High-Frequency RFID

• Low-frequency RFID transponders are read from relatively short distances, of the order of inches, therefore, minimizing theft and loss of data
• Low-frequency RFID transponders are not as affected by destructive interference, especially around metals
• Much higher read reliability
• Low-frequency RFID transponders can be read through water, moisture and other liquids, as well as oil, paint, dirt, dust, grease, etc., which are likely to be present in the extreme military environment
• Overall cost of deploying complete low-frequency RFID system is significantly less

Contact Memory Button

• The non-contact system of low-frequency RFID enables easier and faster reads, as the person doing the reading only need place reader within a few inches of the tag, and then take a reading
• Valuable data are not stored directly on a low-frequency RFID transponder, therefore minimizing theft and loss of data
• Low-frequency RFID transponders ($1-3/tag) cost considerably less than CMB ($15/tag)
• Low-frequency RFID transponders are passive and do not require battery replacement

Active Ultra Wideband

• Low-frequency RFID transponders are read from relatively short distances, of the order of inches, therefore, minimizing theft and loss of data, and allowing for discrete readings in small or sensitive environments, e.g. in a combat or hot zone
• Overall cost of deploying complete system is significantly less
• Low-frequency RFID transponders ($1-3/tag) cost considerably less than UWB tags ($30-40/tag)
• Low-frequency RFID transponders are passive and do not require battery replacement

WHY USE PASSIVE, LOW-FREQUENCY RFID?

Simply put, passive low-frequency RFID is the most thoroughly tested and proven RFID system available today for identifying, tracking and maintaining valuable assets. It’s highly reliable, with more than 15 years of actual field deployment and experience, and has literally tens of millions of tags that are currently in active use in zoo animals, companion animals, wildlife, gas cylinders, soda drink containers (e.g. Coca Cola), automobiles (e.g. Mercedes Benz), containers, livestock, pallets, tools, ski lifts, warehouse stock, etc.

The unique transponder ID is non-contact and independent of line-of-sight, which allows a person with a reader to be at a short stand-off distance from an asset. ID codes can be read through many different media: fresh and salt water, paint, dust, dirt, oil, grease, etc. This criterion of reading through various media cannot be met using a high-frequency RFID system, as the above materials all interfere with a tag’s ability to receive and transmit its valuable information.

A security issue that has long worried commanders is whether a tag can be read by bad guys who possess RFID readers with hacking scareware (software used for hacking). With low-frequency RFID, valuable data cannot be “captured” by unauthorized personnel over long distances, as with high-frequency RFID and UWB, because of the much shorter and safer read ranges. If an enemy wants to read your low-frequency RFID transponder, he’ll have to low-crawl under your wire, right up to you while you sleep, and scan several parts of your weapon or body. By that time, you’ve nailed him and he’s failed his mission to gather intel on you and your tagged assets. With high-frequency RFID, all your enemy has to do is stand outside your wire, point and shoot. Since it probably will only work 60% of the time, he only gets 60% of your intel, yet he doesn’t sacrifice himself to get it. Nonetheless, your enemy still gets something out of the mission. Anything he gets is too much.

Passive, low-frequency RFID transponders have an unlimited lifespan, as there’re very few parts in the tag, and there is no battery. Therefore, the tag is active for milliseconds at a time, and can only be activated by an external reader via electromagnetic induction. The life cycle of a typical low-frequency RFID transponder is millions of read cycles, which is many times more than any transponder would need to be read in anyone’s lifetime. This figure is equivalent to doing more than two reads a minute for more than 25 years. For writable tags, one can read a tag more than 100,000 times.

More still, the transponder code does not degrade over time. It’s ID code is permanent, non-removable, and unique. The ID code of a low-frequency RFID transponder of a non-programmable transponder cannot be duplicated. However, programmable transponders are available for use in special cases.

Finally, the automated nature of data capture effectively eliminates transcription errors that normally occur with manual or bar-code systems. And data are captured within microseconds, allowing for speedy readings of many different items within a relatively short period of time.

In short, the low-frequency RFID system can identify each service member and asset with a unique ID code, plus any additional programmed data when using programmable transponders. It can scan and ID each asset in less than one (1) second, and track and maintain those assets in a database that can be shared over an intranet or internet, and provide digital records from the database for asset management, inventory control, inspections, etc. This type of system also can provide a digital database for historical and life-cycle analyses, which now are largely ignored with manual-data entry.

SELECTING A SUITABLE PASSIVE, LOW-FREQUENCY RFID SYSTEM

There’re many different criteria to consider when selecting a suitable system to deploy. The overall goal is to maximize effectiveness, while minimizing cost and time.

Readability: the read range for a portable or pass-by reader must be relatively short (of the order of inches), to minimize theft of data in transit. The read area must be relatively large; the larger the better. The read speed should be less than one second.

Durability: it must conform to MIL-STD-810F by withstanding exposure to hazardous environments: fresh and salt water, high temperature, high pressure, toxic or corrosive chemicals, etc.

Safety: any electromagnetic emissions should be weak enough so as not to induce sufficient current flow in any explosives, demolitions or ammunition (esp. metals and high-conductance chemicals). An electric current also has an associated voltage that, when above a certain threshold, may induce a spark between metal components, possibly igniting the explosive materials. Low-frequency RFID virtually eliminates this hazard by concentrating electromagnetic fields within the vicinity of the reader and a tag being scanned and read. Hence the need for a system with a relative short read range. An example: in California, Arizona and New Mexico, one can drive along relatively deserted stretches of highway and see large quarries. As one approaches these areas, you see signs that state: “TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES AND DEVICES THAT EMIT ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION.” There’s a good reason for this: high-frequency RF devices, which transmit a lot of power relative to low-frequency RFID devices, can ignite explosives, even from great distances, thus illustrating the potential hazard of using high-frequency RFID readers in areas containing explosives, demolitions and/or ammunition.

Security: no data should be stored on the tag itself to avoid data theft by personnel with a capable reader. There should be no battery to possibly leak and corrode, or simply die, thereby potentially losing valuable data.

Unique ID: you must have unique ID codes to guarantee positive identification. If, say, one is employing an ISO transponder, which is manufactured by several companies according to the existing ISO standard for low-frequency RFID transponders, then the code can be duplicated. This potential duplication can lead to theft and loss of data.

Longevity: the tag must last longer than the theoretical and actual life of an asset. One argument against using bar code is that the tag only lasts about one to two weeks in the field, then must be replaced, and the database noted. The same applies to some high-frequency RFID tags that’re delicate in nature. Lose the tag, lose the data-collection capability for that given asset, then one must take the time and money to replace the tag.

Quality and product reliability: one must use only top-quality tags. Many tags are currently being manufactured overseas by companies that lack internal quality-assurance programs, thereby sending many dead tags into the field. A reliable and experienced source with excellent quality control must be used to supply the tags. The tag itself must have a microchip design that minimizes the number of components. Error and failure rates go up considerably with increasing number of internal components.

ISO 9001 compliant: Tags should be manufactured to the ISO 9001 quality-management standard. The standard, in a nutshell, outlines the four major areas of quality control for an organization, regardless of what product or service it provides.

CONCLUSION: THE BENEFITS OF USING PASSIVE, LOW-FREQUENCY RFID

The benefits, of course, are numerous. What’s more, with current technologies where they are, it’s highly likely that low-frequency RFID can be deployed effective today, and still be the optimum standard in 10-15 years. This statistic is important when purchasing an RFID system, especially in the fast-changing world of modern technology. It’s most important, perhaps, because it allows for a legacy to be established and maintained, without switching to an alternative technology two or three years down the road. Simply put, low-frequency RFID is the optimum solution, and will likely remain so for many years.

The only criterion that can change, i.e. improve, the efficacy of high-frequency RFID are the laws of physics and, to our knowledge, no one has yet found a way to do this on our planet.

Active ultra wideband may become a player in the next 10-15 years, when the cost of manufacture can be brought down to a level comparable to that for low-frequency RFID systems. As it stands now, UMB systems cost about 10 times more than low-frequency RFID systems. While expensive, UWB can be used in areas where high cost is not a consideration, e.g. when IDing and tracking very large and expensive assets that are too large to walk around and scan with hand-held readers. Items like aircraft engines, ship engines and propellers are good examples.

When identifying and tracking humans, low-frequency RFID is the ONLY technology available that will work satisfactorily, especially when the tag must be inserted into a human, i.e. subdermally. Low-frequency RFID transponders can be used as a unique identifier when personnel are incapacitated or deceased, obviating the need for externally carried ID cards that can be lost, stolen or destroyed, or, perhaps worst of all, counterfeited or switched. In the case of most injuries to military personnel, the most likely surviving tissue area is behind the neck, which is where the RFID tag can be placed, ensuring satisfactory identification of service members.

Other excellent reasons for using passive, low-frequency RFID include, and are not limited to:

• Easy to install and maintain
• Requires only very minor changes to existing infrastructure
• Economic, low-cost solution
• Each tag is simple & passive, requires no maintenance or cleaning
• Provides unique ID code for each service member and asset
• Each transponder good for life of asset
• Optimum read ranges
• Assets can be read in hazardous and difficult environments, and at night
• Ensures rapid issue/turn-in of any tagged asset
• Accurately matches personnel with asset at time of issue or turn-in
• Eliminates need for equipment receipts
• Eliminates need for any additional personnel for monthly, quarterly, annual inventories
• Significantly decreases inventory time cost during asset accountability, inventory, and data/record management (from 1,250-2,500 man-days/year to <20 man-days/year)
• Significantly decreases time for individual issue and turn-in (from ~5 minutes/person to <30 seconds/person)
• Significantly decreases overall time for issue and turn-in of ~500 items/150-person company (from ~15 hours to <2 hours)
• Eliminates manual errors in data entry
• Eliminates data loss and theft
• Significantly improves overall physical security
• Significantly improves key-lock control
• Significantly decreases daily paperwork, data entry and inventory control by arms/commo/TMP personnel
• Significantly decreases amount of time during nightly inspections by SDO/SDNCO
• Provides important historical data/records of each asset
• Paperless data can be shared  instantly with higher HQ over intranet or internet
• Helps unit maintain high OPSEC and INFOSEC

In summary, we highly recommend a passive, low-frequency RFID as the optimum solution to identify, track and maintain military weapons and sensitive items. Passive, low-frequency RFID, in general, fulfills all necessary criteria as a suitable ID system, is the most thoroughly tested and proven RFID system, and does not suffer from the severe limitations that plague other RFID systems. What’s perhaps most important, at least economically and temporally, passive low-frequency RFID will likely remain the optimum choice to identify, track and maintain military weapons and sensitive items for at least the next ten years, if not longer. This latter characteristic will ensure product legacy, and will firmly establish this system with the military and other agencies.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

Now, please consider something entirely novel. Something that has never seen the light of day. Or night. A concept so new that there’s only one scientific paper that describes it: Chemically Driven Carbon-Nanotube-Guided Thermopower Waves (Nature Materials, March 2010).

But first a little background. . . .

Nanotechnology: A Novel Science

In 1991, carbon nanotubes were first described, thus giving rise to the new field of nanotechnology, even though the concept of this nascent discipline had been written on paper for decades. In theory. Given the unusual nature of nanotechnology, the field was wide open to research of all color and texture. Scientists from a dozen different disciplines converged on the field and began studying all aspects of it in earnest. US government research grants soared into the billions. The famed Defense Advance Research Projects Agency (DARPA) created a whole new department to handle the thousands of new research projects in nanotechnology.

Within two decades, nanotechnology has produced significant advances–no, quantum leaps!–in the dozens of fields and areas: automotive, appliances, electronics and computers, food and beverage, houshold goods, health and fitness, medical, scientific, and traditional technology.

An Accidental Discovery of Otherworldly Proportions

Dr. Michael Strano of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) grew up watching all the Hollywood sci-fi hits: Star Wars, Battlestar Gallactica, Star Trek, etc. At an early age, he was hooked on the notion that science fiction, through hard work and endless study, soon produced science fact, which meant he could first dream it, then create something entirely new to the world. By the time he had graduated with his PhD in Chemical Engineering, he was primed to enter the new field of nanotechnology, and eagerly jumped into the fray with all senses wide open.

Dr. Strano took a postdoctoral position with the man who discovered the “buckeyball,” or buckminsterfullerene molecule, Nobel Laureate Dr. Richard Smalley, at Rice University, where he absorbed every known fact about the field over a two-year period, then struck out on his own. By 2007, he had an associate professor position at MIT and took off like a rocket: established a niche in the field, and attracted first-rate and energetic graduate students and postdoctoral researchers to his new lab.

He and colleagues’ recent discovery of thermopower waves was phenomenal yet, like most great scientific discoveries, accidental: Strano and his team were examining chemical reactions near a carbon nanotube, and they wanted to know how much heat was being generated. They “hypothesized that the reaction would go much faster if it were near a good heat conductor like a carbon nanotube, which are known to conduct heat very well along their length. They’re about 100 times better at conducting heat along their length than our best metallic conductors,” he said.

Inside A Carbon Nanotube. At the far end, a laser pulse ignites the reaction, which heats up the entire tube, producing heat as light, and electricity. Photo courtesy MIT. Illustration by Ms. Christine Daniloff

Typical crystals we encounter every day can conduct heat in all directions because of the three-dimensional configuration of the crystal lattice. Carbon nanotubes, though, have a unique directionality to their lattice, which conducts heat and electricity down the length of the tube with amazing fidelity. Unlike polymers and crystals, e.g. normal sodium chloride or table salt, carbon nanotubes focus the propagation of a heat wave in only a single direction, i.e. down its length.

What Dr. Strano and his team gleaned from the results of that experiment would create not only a new form of generating electric power, but also a new field of study that would require developing a whole set of brand-new theories and ideas about a phenomenon that no one had ever seen or heard of in the history of science. They originally placed sensitive microelectrodes at either end of the carbon nanotubes to measure the velocity of the thermopower wave, and quickly discovered that the electrical signal they measured was many times greater that they would have expected.

And therein lies the discovery: a new form of electrical power generation, something produced by thermopower wave energy which was, in itself, just as new a phenomenon.

In discoveries like this, how does one approach such a novel concept? Where do you even think to start? How do you begin to understand and comprehend something that has never been seen, let alone explained in full? And how do you introduce it to the world and convince all of us that it’s important to study and support?

Thermopower Waves, Quantum Confinement, and the Wild, Wild Nanoscale World

These and other questions I posed to Dr. Strano during a recent interview, a very lively and passionate discussion of his work and its future impact. For the purpose of this article, I focused on his work on thermopower waves, with some references to other work. In a future article, I will introduce Dr. Strano’s other interests, all of which are equally fascinating and downright mindblowing.

The propagation of heat down a multiwalled carbon nanotube produces considerable heat (via light) and electricity. When Dr. Strano and his team wanted to measure the amount of heat being generated by the reaction, they connected two electrodes to either end of the carbon nanotube system and then heated up one end of the tubes. To their shock, the team recorded a surge in voltage, meaning the reaction generated not only sizable heat along the length of the carbon nanotube, but also a wave of electricity that was many times larger in magnitude than theoretically expected. In fact, the voltage seen in this experiment “was large enough to power some devices,” said Dr. Strano.

As I said before, discoveries happen in a variety of ways, but most are through accidents, even though researchers may have been looking at a similar phenomenon. In this case, they were trying to measure heat and they came up with a novel form of electric-power generation via what they termed a thermopower wave. Moreover, they were able to see the wave reaction with a special high-speed camera that captured 90,000 frames per second. [See video below.]

Okay, so what, and why should all this matter to me, you say?

You have to understand some new concepts here first: matter behaves quite differently at the nanoscale, i.e. the level of just a few atoms, or billionths of a meter, in diameter. Electrons are confined to very small spaces at the quantum level and so exhibit highly unusual behavior. When electrons are limited to a very small space, it’s referred to as quantum confinement.

“This field of quantum confinement can take a material we’re familiar with and grant it new properties,” said Dr. Strano. “We’re used to thinking of carbon as the graphite in our pencils or the carbon in our charcoal briquets, but if you take that same carbon and you pattern it into a cylinder, you can make a semiconductor . . . and it’s because you’ve confined electrons [quantum confinement] that you make a new electronic material.”

In typical solids, electrons normally are confined to the orbitals around their respective atoms. They whirl around the nucleus of an atom and don’t move too far outside those boundaries around that particular atom. In novel nanoscale materials like carbon nanotubes, though, electrons are free to move among a great length of atoms along a nanotube, much more than they would than if they were, say, confined to the crystal lattice of a length of highly electrically conducting copper wire.

The length of travel of an electron or a phonon (heat conductor) in this way, without scattering, is termed ballistic conduction length (BCL). In our own beloved copper wire, which carries all the electrical signals to our homes, the BCL is about 40 nanometers (0.000000040 meters; 4/100,000 the width of a human hair). In carbon nanotubes, the BCL is tens of thousands of times longer, a clear advantage that produces much more electrical power and heat than all of our best electrical conductors. In carbon nanotubes, electrons and phonons do not scatter much at all; they are well focused to propagate their energy down the length of the tube.

Applying the New Technology

To envision how a nanotube array might be configured to be of practical use, consider this: at the nano scale, materials behave in a very different way. We wish to retain these novel properties, so we simply “scale up” the nanotube materials much like we would if we were building a large battery out of Legos. Imagine that each Lego block confines a very small number of electrons in a quantum confinement system. Now add more and more Legos until you come up with a large structure like a car battery, but with each Lego still retaining its unusual quantum properties. This process is calledscaling up the novel nanotube system, so it can be of some practical use to us in the macroscopic, or real, world.

Before a practical scaling up can be accomplished, though, much fundamental work must be done. So, what’s next for the team?

Dr. Michael Strano, Charles and Hilda Roddey Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering, MIT

The first step will be to encapsulate the carbon nanotube with a light-reflecting insulator so the heat and light are both retained along the length of the nanotube. Dr. Strano said, “We can make thermally reflective surfaces that encapsulate around the entire device. Our efficiency is pretty small right now, in the one percent range. At the moment, our system is behaving very much like an old incandescent light bulb. But we don’t want that loss of energy. We want all that light to go back into the system as heat to drive electrons.”

For all this energy generation to be useful, say, in a battery, you need to create a system that can have a lot of electrons flowing past a point per unit time. The power density of this system is the metric that will determine how much electrical energy will be available to a battery to power something like a cell phone or even an electric car. For traditional lithium-powered batteries, the weight of the battery itself is large compared to its power density, and have a power density that’s about 10 times less than that of carbon nanotubes.

Carbon nanotubes have an enormous power density and thus would make a very lightweight battery, even when scaled up to the size of a typical car battery. Of course, a carbon nanotube battery that would power an electric car would be much smaller and have a much higher power density by default.

Dr. Strano: “My strategy is to think about the real-world impact that will come from this research, maybe not immediately, but eventually. For example, most batteries are made of heavy transition metals, things like lithium, cadmium, or lead. These metals are toxic to humans and they’re bad for the environment and they’re complicated to recycle. Our thermopower wave generators are all carbon, and so the combustion breakdown products will be water and carbon dioxide, which are safe for the environment. The same is not true for a lead-cell battery, say, because if you incinerate it you get toxic lead products. Lead stays lead. Plus, the world has a finite amount of lead and lithium. On the other hand, you could grow all the carbon nanotubes you wanted, say, from ethanol.”

Future Work

“We’re going to be doing three things: fundamental research in how these thermopower waves propagate, and using fuels like methanol and ethanol, things that can be bio-derived. The second thing is fleshing out the theory of how these waves propagate, because what I’m really interested in is working out now the limits of these waves: what’s the power density, what’s the absolute efficiency, and what can we expect from the properties of these waves. And the third thing is solving the engineering challenges that will make these thermopower wave generators practical devices, like reflecting the light back into the device. Even if we don’t do the first two, we have the technology to make devices that will be useful, like handheld batteries of short duration where you need a lot of power in a short time.

“There’s also this concept I’ve been working on, the thermopower wave fuel cell. Most fuel cells are made from solid fuels, but we would use a liquid fuel pulsed into the reaction at certain times to keep it going, kind of like a fuel-injection system in your car. This is the way to get this thermopower wave system to power something long term, say, for a car or other vehicle.”

As with all great ideas, the possibilities are limitless. . . .

An Out-of-This-World Reaction Captured On Video

The video below shows a thermopower wave generated at one end of a large collection of carbon nanotubes. The reaction takes about 100 milliseconds, or one-tenth of a second, to complete. The heat lost in this system is primarily lost as radiated light via emission of photons.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: We kindly thank Dr. Michael Strano of MIT for sharing his expertise and for commenting on a draft of this article, and MIT for granting permission to post the video.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

Is that right?

Here’s what I call it: a backlash from recent HAARP events.

HAARP Facilities, Gakona, Alaska

Amateur weather trackers all over the world are seeing this anomalous behavior in our planet’s weather patterns, and agree that these recent changes in local weather, wherever “local” may be, are definitely strange and unusual for our planet. And they eerily coincide with the recent HAARP and HAARP-like “experiments” in various parts of the the US and in other parts of the world (Norway, Russia, China, Puerto Rico).

Signs to watch for:

• Unusual lightning activity, especially if your area does not normally have it
• Unseasonably heavy rains and thunderstorms
• Before a storm, long, sausage-shaped clouds that are oriented along the earth’s magnetic field lines, i.e. magnetic North-South
• In humans, unusual physical/emotional feeling or sensation before, during and/or after a storm

With HAARP activities, there will always be more to follow. . . .

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

What are you legally obliged to tell US government Census takers?

The Constitution protects us citizens from abuse, although The First Sphere of Influence seeks to strip it all away from us, “re-interpret” the language of The Constitution, or enact new laws that require disclosure of personal data and other information that are not in any way necessary for the apportionment of US Representatives, or Federal or state monies.

Please listen to further valuable intel on the legality of the 2010 Census from Mr. Jerry Day, a television and video producer in Los Angeles:

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

As a society that’s been forced into chaos and socialism, bordering on fascism, we have moved away from any semblance of the age-old close-knit community that now exists only in books and the utopian minds of 12 year olds. Are we becoming more and more selfish?

“Observational studies suggest that behaviors, knowledge, and emotions spread between people with personal social ties.”

So when I read academic papers that support what we already know, that random acts of kindness can bring positive change to people’s lives, it gives me further hope for humanity. One particular paper, Cooperative Behavior Cascades in Human Social Networks, by Dr. James H. Fowler and Dr. Nicholas A. Christakis, describes controlled experiments in which subjects had the opportunity to give away a portion or all of their money to strangers, or keep it for themselves.

The experimenters used a standard public-goods game, an experimental model employed in behavioral economics (among other disciplines of human behavior), in which subjects are given equal amounts of money and are allowed to keep the whole or part of the amount, or put some or all of it into a public pot for distribution to the entire community.

So, were people inherently selfish?

Surprisingly not, especially when people witnessed other participants give away their money. The recipients of that money were more likely to give away money of their own, an effect that seemed to extend out to three degrees of separation from the original participant who donated his or her money.

An example: A gives to B who gives to C who gives to D who gives to E who gives to F. If C witnessed A giving to B, C would therefore be more likely to give, an effect that would extend a total of three additional participants, out to F, even if F did not witness C’s philanthropy.

In the laboratory setting, this was the limit of extended giving: three degrees of separation, or three successive people.

The authors stated:

“The flow of good and desirable properties like ideas, love and kindness is required for human social networks to endure, and, in turn, networks are required for such properties to spread.”

“Observational studies suggest that behaviors, knowledge, and emotions spread between people with personal social ties. Of course, people can be influenced by strangers too – for example, in catching a germ, following a worn path on a field, imitating a smile, adopting a fashion, or responding to road rage. In this experiment, relationships were anonymous and contact was not sustained. Nevertheless, there was real interaction, and people observed each others’ behavior in the setting of a game that they cared about. A consistent explanation for both the experimental investigations and the observational studies is that people mimic the behavior they observe, and that this can cause behaviors to spread from person to person to person. If anything, it seems likely that people who are willing to copy strangers’ behavior may be even more likely to copy similar behavior in friends in real world settings.”

Dr. Christakis added: ”Our work over the past few years, examining the function of human social networks and their genetic origins, has led us to conclude that there is a deep and fundamental connection between social networks and goodness. The flow of good and desirable properties like ideas, love and kindness is required for human social networks to endure, and, in turn, networks are required for such properties to spread. Humans form social networks because the benefits of a connected life outweigh the costs.”

In short, philanthropy is highly contagious, even more so when a kind act of giving selflessly is witnessed by others, and it is absolutely necessary for the continuing evolution of a strong and benevolent human society. . . .

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

If you’re like 99.9999% of most Americans, you have no clue what I’m talking about. Here’s a zippy history lesson: the US Federal Reserve Act of 1913 enacted the illegal Federal Reserve Bank, which is still a PRIVATE central bank that illegally prints and controls the US’s currency and credit.

Did you read me?

I say again: the US Federal Reserve Act of 1913 enacted the illegal Federal Reserve Bank, which is still a PRIVATE central bank that illegally prints and controls the US’s currency and credit.

At that time, We the People of the United States had virtually ZERO debt, i.e. no aggregate personal debt due to the individual or personal income tax. Our government did have an outstanding debt of approximately $2.9B, however, due to our having been under the Rothschild rule via the Second Bank of the United States, which was brought down by President Andrew Jackson. President Jackson’s policies, though, did not eliminate our debt altogether, and the US was forced to make payments on it over the next few decades.

Today, in 2010, we are in debt to the tune of trillions of dollars.

“OMG, how!?” you ask.

The Federal Reserve Bank, which is an illegal PRIVATE bank, prints, issues and controls our paper currency, called fiat currency because it is NOT backed by any gold or silver reserve. As an aside, the Federal Reserve is NOT a reserve bank. It has no reserves to back the fiat currency it issues.

Anyway, where was I?

Oh, the Federal Reserve prints money out of thin air. And rag cotton, with some cool inks and various 3-D embossed stamps. Nicely done, Fed. This money is loaned to our own government at INTEREST. Did you get that? At interest to our own government. Who pays this interest, plus billions more? We the People pay it in the form of the INDIVIDUAL (Personal) INCOME TAX each year. Our personal income taxes go to the Federal Reserve Bank each year.

Who owns the US Federal Reserve Bank?

The evil family Rothschilds, currently headed by Baron David de Rothschild.

In honor of how Kurt Vonnegut used to refer to his former son-in-law, Geraldo Rivera, or Jerry Rivers, I shall refer to the Baron as Señor Dave Da RedShield.

So, when you’re looking for the right man to blame, strike first at Dave. And please do not aim high like everyone always does. Go for the testicles. Oops, forget that; Dave has no balls. Go for heart. It’s the lifeless black mass in the center of his sunken chest.

But please don’t forget to honor the man who got us into this mess in the first place, with his monumental plan to create the Federal Reserve System of the United States.

Paul Warburg is the father of the mother of all debt.

Thank you Paul.

Thank you, Dave.

Love,

Dean

Paul Warburg, The Father of the Mother of All Debt

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

Dear Friends,

The following correspondence between Dr. David Hosack and Mr. William Coleman, editor of Hamilton’s broadsheet, the New York Evening Post (now New York Post) details the last hours of traitor Alexander Hamilton, who was mortally wounded in a duel with Colonel Aaron Burr on July 11, 1804.

This is the way all traitors should die: painfully, and harboring great regret. . . .

I have copied this letter verbatim from the papers of Colonel Aaron Burr, so please excuse the long paragraphs. Early-19th-Century physicians were pleonastic and windy.

As always, I am

Your obedient servant,

William Dean A. Garner

August 17, 1804.

DEAR SIR,

To comply with your request is a painful task; but I will repress my feelings while I endeavour to furnish you with an enumeration of such particulars relative to the melancholy end of our beloved friend Hamilton as dwell most forcibly on my recollection.

When called to him upon his receiving the fatal wound, I found him half sitting on the ground, supported in the arms of Mr. Pendleton. His countenance of death I shall never forget. He had at that instant just strength to say, “This is a mortal wound, doctor;” when he sunk away, and became to all appearance lifeless. I immediately stripped up his clothes, and soon, alas! ascertained that the direction of the ball must have been through some vital part.

His pulses were not to be felt, his respiration was entirely suspended, and, upon laying my hand on his heart and perceiving no motion there, I considered him as irrecoverably gone. I, however, observed to Mr. Pendleton, that the only chance for his reviving was immediately to get him upon the water. We therefore lifted him up, and carried him out of the wood to the margin of the bank, where the bargemen aided us in conveying him into the boat, which immediately put off. During all this time I could not discover the least symptom of returning life. I now rubbed his face, lips, and temples with spirits of hartshorn, applied it to his neck and breast, and to the wrists and palms of his hands, and endeavoured to pour some into his mouth. When we had got, as I should judge, about fifty yards from the shore, some imperfect efforts to breathe were for the first time manifest; in a few minutes he sighed, and became sensible to the impression of the hartshorn or the fresh air of the water. He breathed; his eyes, hardly opened, wandered, without fixing upon any object; to our great joy, he at length spoke. “My vision is indistinct,” were his first words. His pulse became more perceptible, his respiration more regular, his sight returned. I then examined the wound to know if there was any dangerous discharge of blood; upon slightly pressing his side it gave him pain, on which I desisted. Soon after recovering his sight, he happened to cast his eye upon the case of pistols, and observing the one that he had had in his hand lying on the outside, he said, “Take care of that pistol; it is undischarged, and still cocked; it may go off and do harm. Pendleton knows” (attempting to turn his head towards him) “that I did not intend to fire at him.” “Yes,” said Mr. Pendleton, understanding his wish, “I have already made Dr. Hosack acquainted with your determination as to that.” He then closed his eyes and remained calm, without any disposition to speak; nor did he say much afterward, except in reply to my questions. He asked me once or twice how I found his pulse; and he informed me that his lower extremities had lost all feeling, manifesting to me that he entertained no hopes that he should long survive. I changed the posture of his limbs, but to no purpose; they had entirely lost their sensibility. Perceiving that we approached the shore, he said, “Let Mrs. Hamilton be immediately sent for; let the event be gradually broken to her, but give her hopes.” Looking up we saw his friend, Mr. Bayard, standing on the wharf in great agitation. He had been told by his servant that General Hamilton, Mr. Pendleton, and myself had crossed the river in a boat together, and too well he conjectured the fatal errand, and foreboded the dreadful result. Perceiving, as we came nearer, that Mr. Pendleton and myself only sat up in the stern sheets, he clasped his hands together in the most violent apprehension; but when I called to him to have a cot prepared, and he at the same moment saw his poor friend lying in the bottom of the boat, he threw up his eyes and burst into a flood of tears and lamentation. Hamilton alone appeared tranquil and composed. We then conveyed him as tenderly as possible up to the house. The distresses of this amiable family were such that, till the first shock was abated, they were scarcely able to summon fortitude enough to yield sufficient assistance to their dying friend.

Upon our reaching the house he became more languid, occasioned probably by the agitation of his removal from the boat. I gave him a little weak wine and water. When he recovered his feelings, he complained of pain in his back; we immediately undressed him, laid him in bed, and darkened the room. I then gave him a large anodyne, which I frequently repeated. During the first day he took upward of an ounce of laudanum; and tepid anodyne fomentations were also applied to those parts nearest the seat of his pain. Yet were his sufferings during the whole of the day almost intolerable.

I had not the shadow of a hope of his recovery; and Dr. Post, whom I requested might be sent for immediately on our reaching Mr. Bayard’s house, united with me in this opinion. General Rey, the French consul, also had the goodness to invite the surgeons of the French frigates in our harbour, as they had had much experience in gunshot wounds, to render their assistance. They immediately came; but, to prevent his being disturbed, I stated to them his situation, described the nature of his wound, and the direction of the ball, with all the symptoms that could enable them to form an opinion as to the event. One of the gentlemen then accompanied me to the bedside. The result was a confirmation of the opinion that had already been expressed by Dr. Post and myself.

During the night he had some imperfect sleep, but the succeeding morning his symptoms were aggravated, attended, however, with a diminution of pain. His mind retained all its usual strength and composure. The great source of his anxiety seemed to be in his sympathy with his half-distracted—wife and children. He spoke to me frequently of them—”My beloved wife and children” were always his expressions. But his fortitude triumphed over his situation, dreadful as it was; once, indeed, at the sight of his children, brought to the bedside together, seven in number, his utterance forsook him; he opened his eyes, gave them one look, and closed them again till they were taken away. As a proof of his extraordinary composure of mind, let me add, that he alone could calm the frantic grief of their mother. “Remember, my Eliza, you are a Christian,” were the expressions with which he frequently, with a firm voice, but, in a pathetic and impressive manner, addressed her. His words, and the tone in which they were uttered, will never be effaced from my memory. About two o’clock, as the public well know, he expired—

“Incorrupta fides—nudaque veritas
Quando ullum invenient parem?
Multis ille quidem flebilis occidit.”

Your friend and humble servant,

DAVID HOSACK

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

That is the lament.

If they were not, we Americans would be have about $2.36T more in our pockets each year. That comes to about $10,000 or so for each taxpaying citizen.

Now consider this: even IF the Federal government did NOT receive this $2.36T each year from us as personal income tax payments, that same corrupt and misguided government would still be able to fund every single program on its yearly agenda.

Every single program.

Our tax dollars are NOT necessary for this corrupt and misguided government to run on a daily basis.

Our hard-earned personal income tax dollars go into a deep-pocket slush fund owned by the evil family Rothschild.

One can only wonder what they do with all that money each year.

I know what I would do with it.

How about you?

How about one little idea: we could provide first-rate healthcare for every single American each year. For life.

And that’s just the beginning.

Don’t get me started on this. I love math and statistics. . . .

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

When I had finished, Siesta Key Storm wasn’t exactly what she was thinking about, but it was acceptable. The whitecaps were lacking, but then again I’m slow to absorb some things. My hope is that, by the time we’re both gone from this beautiful earth, I will have gotten it right and painted exactly what she had in mind. And if I hadn’t gotten it right by that time, at least the journey with her was wonderful. . . .

Siesta Key Storm: An Original Tranquil Impressionism Painting by William Dean A. Garner

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

Russia and China WILL attack the United States in at least one retaliatory strike, using a HAARP-like instrument, something that results in a massive earthquake in an earthquake zone, most likely along the US’s Pacific coast.

Since this is entirely orchestrated by TFSI, absolutely nothing can stop the coming calamity. Nothing can stop it. Nothing. Are you reading me clearly? Nothing can stop it.

When nothing can stop the machinations of a rogue government or cell, it’s time to take action.

In the coming months, I will outline what I mean by action. And if I should be murdered by TFSI, I have ensured that my voice will be heard. In the least, someone smarter than I will listen and carry on what so many of us Jeffersonian Patriots have continued to do: fight the evil Rothschilds.

While I cannot predict exactly when the earthquake(s) will occur, my best guess is within 90 days, as stated in a previous article. And I shall not discount the distinct possibility, if not high probability, that the attack could also come from one of the US’s own HAARP transmitters. After all, the Rothschilds own ALL HAARP-like transmitters on the planet and could easily use any one of them in a false-flag operation.

We live in interesting times, indeed, much of it brought on by high-technology like the Internet. We are a smaller planet because of the Internet and Worldwide Web, and we Jeffersonian Patriots appreciate these valuable tools.

Our hearts go out to those who will lose their lives in this false-flag retaliatory strike.

How is it yet another false-flag operation? It has been designed by TFSI to divide the good people of this beautiful planet of ours, so TFSI spawn can further implement their new laws and regulations, all designed to enslave us good people. Recall The Patriot Act, the establishment of Department of Homeland Security and the Transportation Security Administration, the attempt to force-feed Americans healthcare reform. These four measures alone strip American of significant Constitutional rights, and more are on the way.

My words are fantastic, yes, but my message is simple: we are in the middle of a 230-year war against an insidious disease, and that disease–the Rothschilds–must be eradicated at all costs.

All costs.

What will be your contribution to the war effort?

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

I’ll keep this one short, because the otherworldly content will leave you breathless. . . .

You don’t know me from the next stranger, so I’ll give you a little background, just the relevant stuff: I did research for 15 years as a biophysicist, so my background was in biological sciences, physics and engineering. As a young student, I loved reading about the man who blew Einstein out of the water: Nikola Tesla. This brilliant man was gobbled up by moneyed men, chewed to pieces, then spat out in ruins, his otherworldly research left in the hands of unscrupulous human beings.

Isn’t that the way it always is? The most brilliant man on the planet, broke as could be so he sought the help and sponsorship of the wealthy, only to be destroyed before reaching his prime.

Lucky for us, though, Nicola Tesla left behind clues to his genius, and now those clues live on in the form of small books, articles and pamphlets, published by obscure little presses. If you do an online search for “Nikola Tesla,” you’ll be rewarded with hundreds of gems. If you’re not into physics or you’re not the curious type, please ignore this explanation. You should, however, take notice on one little issue that Tesla discussed: Tesla provided the theory behind the US’s current weapon of mass destruction: the high-frequency, active-auroral research project (HAARP).

HAARP antennas are located in several different known places, and probably several more that are not well, if at all, known. If I were in charge HAARP, I’d build a hundred of these facilities all over the world, and not tell a soul about any of them.

Send enough energy into the ionosphere and you’ll excite a sufficient volume of charged air. The propagated energy will cause an earthquake.

The principles of physics that underlie HAARP are generally not too complex. In short, it generates long-range microwaves that heat up the ionosphere directly above the antenna array. As the ionosphere heats up, it excites charges particles at about 45 miles above the earth. The resulting electromagnetic signal descends back to earth at another location on the planet, and can be used to cause very intense, very-low-frequency vibrations in the earth. The overall result? Send enough energy into the ionosphere and you’ll excite a sufficient volume of charged air. The propagated energy will cause an earthquake.

Yes, I said an earthquake. How much power does it take to artificially cause an earthquake, using HAARP? Some say about a billion watts directly from the HAARP antenna array on the ground.

The Chinese have a HAARP-like instrument. So do the Russians, and both are now talking about retaliatory strikes against the US, so you should now expect some severe seismic activity in US states and provinces over the next 90 days.

Dunno about you, but now I’m worried, because there’re already several HAARP-like antenna arrays in different parts of the globe, and they’re in the hands of some not-so-nice people who have already been testing their new weapons in various places. The Chinese have a HAARP-like instrument. So do the Russians, and both are now talking about retaliatory strikes against the US, so you should now expect some severe seismic activity in US states and provinces over the next 90 days. If you’re not sure what to look for, just glance up at the sky and watch out for strange, longitudinal cloud formations that closely resemble long sausages. Colors like blues and reds also will accompany some formations.

So how do you know if that earthquake were generated by HAARP or a HAARP-like instrument? Interestingly, it takes hours to heat up the ionosphere, which means that in the day preceding a HAARP attack, the atmosphere directly above the target area undergoes several changes that can be seen with the naked eye, as mentioned above: significant color changes in the sky, from red to blue to all variations in between; red-hot and white-hot balls of plasma in the sky, and they resemble a ball of fire. No kidding: a ball of fire in the sky. Also, instrumentation that can measure changes in the earth’s magnetic field and the electric field will see significant and wildly fluctuating changes in both the magnetic field and electric field in the vicinity of the target.

So far, Haitians reported wildly changing colors in the sky the day before the devastating earthquake. Same, too, for the earthquakes in China and Japan recently.

The following video explains a bit more about HAARP. As with all other intel I post on That’s Just Plum Dumb, I encourage you to do your own research.

Now please excuse me while I go microwave some popcorn and go outside and watch the sky go wacky-wild in blues and reds and all-in-betweens, because I posted this damning article about HAARP and it pissed someone off. . . .

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

Mr. Markopolos is the man responsible for analyzing Bernie Madoff’s too-good-to-be-true investment scheme and then serving it up on a silver platter to the SEC. He was rebuffed by the US government for 10 years. One wonders who at the SEC, among other agencies, knew full well about Madoff’s money-making rip-off and directed the SEC to ignore Mr. Markopolos.

If you have little time now and really want only the dirty, nasty, stinky, rotten, accurate truth, skip to the end of the video for Mr. Markopolos’s great advice.

Another Harry Markopolos gem: “If you don’t understand the strategy, don’t invest in it.”

Duh.

Oops, forgot something here: somewhere during the interview, Mr. Markopolos confessed that he bought a pistol and seriously considered killing Bernie Madoff. . . .

Mr. Harry Markopolos: a Jeffersonian Patriot.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

What an excellent point: the American cowboy will wake up.

Dunno about you, but the toughest men I’ve ever been around were American cowboys, each cleverly disguised as a US Army Airborne Ranger.

Even though the evil Rothschilds worship demons, they will be crying to God for help when those Great American Cowboys awaken, wipe down their guns, sharpen their knives, saddle up high, and head on down the road for another day’s work.

You know what they say, too: Once a Ranger, Always a Ranger. . . .

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

Armed with this new information, now please imagine at least a few of the consequences and secondary effects resulting from the evils listed above. Those, too, would fill a thousand 400-page books. What are some of those repercussions? Wars produced millions of dead, dying and injured men and women, not to mention the collateral casualties and material damage. Central banks delivered immediate debt to all nations, the money being funneled to the family Rothschild. Illegal taxation brought forth significant loss of income to all those taxpayers in each country.

And within each category above, there also are tertiary and quaternary effects that, like the ever-increasing branching of a tree, curl and twist and move well beyond the trunk, growing smaller, yes, but more numerous and convoluted.

The overall effects of the intrigues of the evil family Rothschild have wrought such destruction of our beautiful planet for more than 230 years. In every industry. To every corner of the globe. Within every aspect of life.

When faced with such a cunning cancer, a skillful surgeon looks at it from all angles, studies it macroscopically to see its extent and volume and composition, then nanoscopically to further examine its anatomy and physiology at the cellular and molecular level. She then studies her options for removal of the cancerous beast, and sets out on a journey of discovery into the relative unknown, carefully cutting and slicing and burning away the unwelcome demon. Slowly and meticulously, with the slow and methodical movement of an Old Master at his easel, she peels back the demonic calculus, artfully separating it from the host tissues. Time slows to a crawl as she fills Biohazard containers with the wicked parasitic mass.

With the focus of a thousand points of light, she finally removes the final bloody cancerous tissue and, with the flair of a Grand Maestro, fine baton in hand, flicks it into the flame where it sizzles momentarily, then turns to ash and falls like black dust to the floor below. . . .

This is how I imagine the demise of the Rothschilds, their descending into the very hell they created, never to rise again.

Fantasy is one thing, reality another.

But let’s think for a moment, shall well? Think of a world with no Rothschilds about. What would it look like to you? No wars. No revolutions. No central banks. No personal income taxes. No [fill in the blank].

I’m not so naive to think none of these events would ever occur again. To the contrary. Thing is, all of these hellish events of the past 230 years have been brought on by the evil Rothschilds, so it’s not a giant step to conclude that Rothschild-influenced wars, revolutions, central banks and taxation would cease.

Nor is it a leap of faith to conclude that the world would be much better off without this horrid family of passive-aggressive, psychopathic, inbred, effeminate males and all their spawn.

Of course, I know some of you would dearly miss Château Mouton Rothschild and Château Lafite.

May I suggest the Yalumba Barossa Shiraz + Viognier 2006?

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

I’ve spent more than 3,000 hours underwater with sharks of all tooth and stripe. When I started graduate school, way back in the early ’80s, I did research in biophysics, studying how sharks detect electric fields around their prey. Being the lousy scientist I was, I never published my work, although did get a first Master’s degree out of it. Hey, I wasn’t about publishing; I was about gaining knowledge and having a jolly adventurous time.

Point is, I’ve studied animals behavior all my life, and feel one with many animals. This does not mean I could stop a charging bull elephant. It just means I understand the behaviors of many creatures, large and small, and know how to act around them, know their pre-attack postures and sounds, and know what to do to avoid attack. Don’t go in the water is a good way to avoid attack by sharks, by the way.

The tragic death of Dawn Brancheau glaringly illustrates Big Corporation’s psychopathic craving of profits over safety. We see it in every major industry. There simply are no exceptions.

While Ms. Brancheau had stated in previous interviews the inherent dangers of working with killer whales, she never once felt that she would be attacked and killed by one.

I’ve only seen a few killer whales, and they were all in captivity. Their enormous size, especially inside those small enclosures, conjured up thoughts of prison inmates, living in their six-foot by eight-foot house for years on end, and following the day in, day routine of getting up at six am, chow at seven, work until four or five pm, chow at six, personal time until lights out. Over and over and over.

For those with truly low intelligence, the routine isn’t bad. It’s a comfort for many, in fact, being told what to do, when and how. And being fed three times a day, on time, the same meal, day in, day out.

Routine.

For more-intelligent creatures, though, routine can be deadly. And couple boring and barely-stimulating routine with a tight enclosure with very limited freedom of movement, and you have a recipe for disaster.

Keeping orcas in captivity is just such a disaster, and Big Corporation knows this. They gamble with the lives of their doe-eyed trainers whose lifelong obsession is to swim and play with God’s big, beautiful killer whales. They pay them reasonably well, allow them plenty of playtime with their charges, and put them on display for the public to enjoy. All the while knowing fully well that they were just rolling the dice each time they placed a beautiful, unsuspecting human in a small tank with a killer whale, emphasis on KILLER.

Killer whales, or orcas, are known to migrate thousands of miles a year, hunting both fish and marine mammals year round. Their range is vast and wide in the wild, and is reduced somewhat when placed in captivity. So why confine these majestic beasts to what would be, in the wild, the equivalent of a tide pool to them?

Wild animals are just that: wild. It takes thousands of years to domesticate an animal species, and even then there will often be blood spilled because of residual wild genes that code for, well, feral behavior. Behaviors that include ripping into flesh, biting the neck and head, clawing and scratching, etc. Our cat Mayo still smacks and nips at me when she’s pissy. Imagine if she were 400 pounds of tooth and claw. I’d be ribbons.

Recall the stunning Las Vegas act of Siegfried and Roy when, on a typical Friday even performance, Roy Horn was attacked by one of the pair’s white tigers, which bit deep into Mr. Horn’s neck and caused massive loss of blood, not to mention partial paralysis, loss of speech for some time, among other problems.

Shouldn’t we have the sense to recognize that feral animals belong in the wild, and we humans no longer are a welcome part of that society . . . unless we’re on the menu?

As long as Big Corporation is raking in the profits, tragedies like the death of Dawn Brancheau will continue. . . .

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

This family of cunning, deceiving and deceptive, and psychopathic and passive-aggressive  creatures has utterly failed to produce one single stable government on this planet. Not a single one.

They have control over most of the nations on this beautiful planet of ours, with the goal of enslaving all humans under a slave state with one ruler, or maybe a small cabal of minions of the Rothschilds. Let’s see if I get this right: the evil Rothschilds think that we humans will just roll over and give in to their demands and orders and unjust laws, huh?

While I do see a planet of frightened followers, I do not see those followers cowering in such paralyzing fear . . . and ultimately doing nothing in their defense.

I cannot predict how all this plays out, but I do know that life finds a way to be free.

I cannot predict how all this plays out, but I do know that life finds a way to be free. That’s the essence of life, my friends. It always seeks out and discovers an escape from bonds, however strong and impenetrable they may be. It finds a way out into the sun, the fresh air, the majestic sky, and down some untrodden path to freedom.

Yes, life finds a way. This much I do know. And I also know that the Rothschilds underestimate this fact of nature. When you despise life so, how can you possible respect it and its chemistry?

So, this leads me back to the subtitle of this article: They Can’t Even Get It Right On A Teeny-Tiny Scale.

Our Founding Fathers, the true Patriots, those loyal to the United States and not to Great Britain, were confident that they could establish a good, solid and stable government under the rule of a US President and his cabinet and a Congress.

If you read the writings of our Founding Fathers, the true Patriots, those loyal to the United States and not to Great Britain, were confident that they could establish a good, solid and stable government under the rule of a US President and his cabinet and a Congress. While there was always disagreement and bickering, there also was always at least one man who stood up and said the right thing, something everyone understood, respected and then accepted as gospel. Or law. Our Fathers knew that they had to control the Nation’s money supply, and that if the Rothschilds ever got their slimy hands on it, all would be lost and our wonderful country would be turned into a slave nation. They knew this because of what they themselves had witnessed in France and Great Britain, both countries then under Rothschild control. Many of our Founding Fathers lived in Great Britain and Europe for years at a time, and were engaged at levels above the common folk.

The Rothschilds think they can enslave each nation, abolish those nations’ constitutions, suspend the rights of the people, take over governments, and force people to pay them day in, day out and to be their slaves for the lifetimes of those under them?

Tell me you’re kidding, Rothschilds. Please. This is one action that will NEVER happen, try as you may to make it so. You guys can’t even control a single nation and her people right now. How do you expect to bring all nations under your rule and control us all at once? Fear? Repression? Oppression? Murder? Rape? Mayhem? Destruction and seizure of property?

The Rothschilds think they can enslave each nation, abolish those nations’ constitutions, suspend the rights of the people, take over governments, and force people to pay them day in, day out and to be their slaves for the lifetimes of those under them?

While I do not know all the details of history over the past 230 years, I do have a keen eye and that eye is able to examine the RESULTS of the ill deeds by the Rothschilds. Those results are stunning and egregious. They also tell me that those in charge have no clue what they’re doing. Oh, they’re controlling the money supply okay. Yes, they’re controlling the banks and the media okay. And they’re conducting false-flag operations like the Guld of Tonkin incident, 9/11 attacks, Oklahoma bombing, etc. and thus from those ashes are creating departments like Homeland Security and the Transportation Security Administration. Yes, they’re controlling and oppressing and rolling right over us okay.

And they’re also getting it all wrong, because they’re reading us commoners all wrong. And they’re acting as a 12 year old would, doing what they are programmed to do. But those 12 year olds don’t know the world yet. They haven’t lived to know it, to know about life. The Rothschilds are in the twilight of their adolescent years, getting it all wrong all over and in such colorful ways. There’s something certain about 12 year olds: they either grow up or they die. Those who grow up take different paths, some good, some neutral, some bad.

Mother Nature and Evolution find a way to weed out the bad, and I’ve seen this over the decades everywhere I’ve lived and worked and played.

Mother Nature and Evolution find a way to weed out the bad, and I’ve seen this over the decades everywhere I’ve lived and worked and played. Everywhere. That’s how I know that the RESULTS suggest to me that the Rothschilds will fail and will go down in blood. Too bad these no-spined squishes never got into a fist-fight before, never learned the art of real combat, because when The People come for them, they’ll only be able to throw cash and coin at the rampaging mob, begging for mercy, for leniency, screaming to be spared because they’re more clever than we are, and we need them.

In the end, I see the Rothschild dynasty [die, with emphasis on nasty, thank you.] going the way of the Dodo bird and existing only on a page or two of Wikipedia, a few books and pamphlets, and in the molecules of those various animate and inanimate things that assimilate their bare-bones atoms.

I almost wanted to end the story back at the last paragraph, but hubris took hold and dragged me back into time, to the days when we had to tackle Fermi questions, figure out the size of the black hole that could compress Earth. Now I’m all worked up, so I calculated the approximate number of atoms in all the Rothschilds: 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. That’s a 1 followed by 32 zeros. If you write it out qualitatively, it’s 10,000 billion billion billion.

Sounds like a lot of atoms, yes? The Rothschild Atoms combined might be enough to fill 15 average-sized swimming pools in California . . . or a small, two-million-gallon swamp in Louisiana . . . or form dung heap about 50 feet high and 60 feet in diameter.

Like Dr. Ian Malcolm said in Jurassic Park: “That’s one big pile of shit.”

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

Consider these thoughts:
-Every economic depression and recession has been orchestrated by the Rothschilds . . .
-Every major war since the late 1770s has been engineered by the Rothschilds . . .
-Tens of millions of good people, decent human beings, have been murdered by the Rothschilds . . .
-Democratic countries that were once on good footing both at home and abroad have been economically destroyed and partially rebuilt–with serious debt load–by the Rothschilds . . .
-At least four US presidents have been assassinated for either not toeing the line of the Rothschilds or for defying them and their wishes . . .
-The US, once a proud and free nation, albeit for only a few decades, has been reduced to the country with the highest debt on the planet, most, if not all, of which goes to the Rothschilds . . .
-All worldwide central banks, which control the flow of taxes from and debt of each nation, are owned by the Rothschilds. . . .

I condemn the Rothschilds for crimes against humanity.

The list is endless if you consider all the millions of little transactions the Rothschilds conduct each and every day, each one a fraudulent rip-off of some country, state, government, corporation, bank or individual.

I condemn the Rothschilds for crimes against humanity.

Okay, sounds good, but now what?

Honestly? I’m at a total loss for how to proceed. I’m not just a babe in the woods, in the dark, in the rain, in the freezing cold. I’m not just a novice and a dilettante, I’m a complete and utter fool even for mentioning such things. I’m so far over my head in this no-win game that I don’t even rank, don’t even register as a dot on anyone’s radar. I’m an absolute nobody and a nothing.

Yet, I still press on, thinking that I will keep doing good research on the Rothschilds, keep asking people for help in generating more results, and continue to add dots to the impossibly large and expansive constellation of so-far-unknown ill deeds done by the Rothschilds, and, yes, to keep on connecting some of those dots with the hope and prayer that some young person will come to my rescue, someone far smarter and greater than I, someone who will actually DO something with all these data. I fantasize that that young soul rescues all of us from the insidious clutches of the most evil family on this planet. Of course, I could be completely ignorant here, discounting the probability that a race of reptilian aliens is the root cause of all this, and the Rothschilds simply answer to them. It’s silly and far fetched, but I consider it. At least for folly.

So I ask myself, does fighting really matter?

I fantasize that that young soul rescues all of us from the insidious clutches of the most evil family on this planet.

When you look at a small part of this whole situation, a small moment in time, you’ll discover that little gets done by people like me. There’s just too much to do, too much to uncover, too much to act on for one man and a small band of like-minded people to take on. If you then pull back and examine our work over years and maybe decades, you begin to see a striking detail that was not previously seen up close: word about the Rothschilds is spreading more and more each year, each decade, each century.

More and more people are being forced under the thumb of Communism, Socialism, Fascism, and they’re resisting. Maybe not by much, but they’re resisting, nonetheless. And they’re talking about it. On the worldwide web in discussion groups, on websites in articles and stories, on Facebook and MySpace in personal pages, in emails and text messages and instant chats. Life is finding a way to be free. That’s the phenomenon I see happening slowly but definitely here. And I feel it taking root, something that hasn’t happened in the past, with good people holding fast at the ground level and supporting those above them.

People are starting to talk, yes. And they’re starting to question very harshly the motives of the Rothschilds and their minions. With time, more and more people will question and then demand answers from politicians and other leaders, and when those demands are not met, there will be blood. . . .

With time, more and more people will question and then demand answers from politicians and other leaders, and when those demands are not met, there will be blood. . . .

Does fighting really matter to me? Yes. I know I’m as insignificant as they come. I’m a nobody ghostwriter and editor of other people’s books. I have no following of friends or colleagues or family or anyone, really. And I’m scared. Hell, I’m always scared. I’m scared of everything. All the time. That’s my chemistry. But I’m never afraid to DO things. Never. I’m a Jeffersonian Patriot; I know no other way than to fight.

So, yes, fighting does matter to me. Fighting the Brzezinskis and the Rothschilds with all I have, which isn’t much, trust me. I do believe that my teeny, little insignificant mark I leave in this arena will be seen by someone in the future, and they’ll take up the fight and they’ll be better and smarter and stronger.

Yes, it’s all worth it to me, to continue my fight and my research. I only hope that someone like YOU will stop and take a listen, maybe even an interest in this subject, and maybe even pass it on to someone else.

Is it worth dying for?

Absofuckinlutely.

But as the great Bo Jackson said, “I can take a lick, but I’d rather give one. . . .”

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and democracy. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

When it comes to finding common items, names, places, themes, books, etc., any decent search engine will do fine, simply because there’s enough information, plenty of websites out there in the WWWsphere to satisfy anyone’s need. Which means, Google can do simple searches just as well as anyone else. The limiting factor is organization, and Clusty.com handles it much better than Google. Clusty takes each search and “clusters” like items into, well, clusters that are then listed off the to left of the search results. The highest number of web pages within each cluster is listed at the top, with lower numbers in descending order.

Google clusters, too, but it predefines what the clusters are, and you have to choose the link Web: Show Options at the top left of the search results. Who the heck would know to do that? Google’s smarties aren’t all that smart, you ask me; in fact, they’re user-unfriendly, probably because they’re all misfit geeks and nerds who have no idea how to properly interact in the real world where you and I happily reside and work and play and, uh, do online searches. Personally, I’d suggest to Google to hire some normal people. Like me, for instance. I’d revamp their whole look, make it accessible enough for a 12 year old, and even change that stupid logo. Oh, and the name, too. When Google entered the market ten years back, I said, “Oh, shit, that awful peanut butter and jelly combo is back to give us more diarrhea.”

Let’s see, where was I in all this less-than-objective reporting? [Don't blame me, I'm having fun being highly subjective, while also offering some good, accurate intel.]

Clusty automatically clusters for you, and again it does so by combining all like categories. It doesn’t automatically group these items into specific, already-defined groups: images, videos, news, blogs, updates, etc. This is okay for some, but it still doesn’t provide accurate groupings. Clusty.com allows the search results to determine the cluster categories. Example: do a search for Amelia Earhart and you get: Biography (33), Photos (25), etc. The numbers in parentheses represent the number of web pages or items in each category.

Google automatically displays the photos of Amelia Earhart which is a great idea, but again the results from “popular” sites, not necessarily ones that are relevant to your search.

I’m heavily biased toward Clusty.com, because it offers more relevant search results for searches I’ve done over the past several years. I have used Google, too, to compare over the years, which has brought me to this subject of today’s article.

Unfortunately, both search engines suffer much by NOT listing all the possible search results. For example, Google will state that it found 348 results out of 4,534,238 total results. Cool. Now where are the other 4,533,890 results? Ask me and I’ll tell you that Google is advertising falsely. Bait and switch.

When I look at the very last possible page of results for Amelia Earhart, it only goes up to page 799, although it states at the top of the search that there were about 2,620,000 other results available. Again, where the heck are they and why don’t I have access to them? I could grow a larger brain and click on the teeny little link under all the results to see more. The statement reads like this:

“In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 799 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.”

When I click on repeat the search with the omitted results included, I see only an additional 10 results that had been previously omitted. Where are the remainder, Google? Again, ask me and I’ll learn ya something here: Google doesn’t list them because it doesn’t dig that deeply into all the possible results across the worldwide web. Yet it will have us believe it does.

All this said, I’m with Clusty.com, and I still will do side-by-side comparisons with Google to see how the latter evolves. I’m hopeful that, for all its billions of dollars, a huge campus of “research and development,” thousands of smarty employees from UC Berkeley and Stanford, blah, blah, blah, Google will someday actually live up to its overinflated reputation.

Ahhh, I feel much better now that I got my Google-bash on. Goodnight and thank you.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

19 GARD AV #1

BRONXVILLE, NY 10708

(914) 337-0511

Mika “Bubbles” Brzezinski

97 KENSINGTON RD

BRONXVILLE, NY 10708

(914) 337-0511

Mika “Bubbles” Brzezinski

1 PARK AVENUE TE

BRONXVILLE, NY 10708

(914) 337-0511

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

1061 SPRING HILL RD

MC LEAN, VA 22102

(703) 448-0669

and

106 POMMANDER WALK

ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

Classically, impressionism was designed to be an artist’s personal opinion of objects in a natural world, and was wide open to enlightened interpretation. Of course, there always is the possibility that said artist was optically myopic and so saw the world as a series of colorful smudges and swirls when he wasn’t wearing spectacles or a monocle. While it seems far fetched, I do not discount this possibility.

The tranquil component is one I used to describe the emotional feeling one perceives when viewing and absorbing such impressionistic artwork. Thus, tranquil impressionism is a slightly abstract style of painting that creates a deeply peaceful, arousing and thoughtful emotion in the mind of the beholder, using natural colors, tones, shapes and patterns, all modeled loosely after Mother Nature herself.

I’ve always known that what a person loves and prefers in life is a metric of her neurochemical and neuroanatomical makeup. Thus, patterns of behavior provide glimpses into the mind of a human being, what kind of person she is, what she likes and dislikes, her level of intelligence, etc. In 200 years, we will all know this apparent hypothesis to be absolute fact, but for now I simply say I know and understand it to be accurate and true, based on my direct observations of the world over several decades. In short, in 200 years perhaps, we will be able to look inside a person’s brain, discern all the connections and chemistry, and predict exactly what this person likes, loves, prefers, etc. After all, we are little more than a sophisticated, biologically based computer whose motor runs on sugar. Oh, and just add water.

I’ve always known that what a person loves and prefers in life is a metric of her neurochemical and neuroanatomical makeup.

When a person has a love for New Age music, soft colors, yoga each morning, and chooses to live in the mountains, well away from civilization, we can use all these traits and interests to form a profile of this person. Other like-minded people can be grouped into this same category, too, thus bringing together like people of like interests and forming deep friendships based on their extreme similarities. We sense these similar interests and traits in others and, on a subconscious level, migrate toward them chemically and magnetically.

Where was I going with all this?

Over the past four years since conjuring up that first tranquil impressionistic painting, I have done a hundred other paintings. People seeing dozens of them side by side for the first time remark that the artwork could have been painted by 20 different artists of the same genre. Perhaps this is explained by my multiple personalities, or simply my ability to put myself into vastly different mindsets and neural zones. Others have immediately exclaimed, “The colors!” or “Wow!” or “I love it even though I don’t know what it is!”

Observing the initial reactions of viewers to the tranquil impressionism paintings has revealed that people, at first blush, do have a visceral reaction to them. With a little time, they then try to make sense of the artwork, searching in their past for some familiar image they saw in nature. Or somewhere. They try to place my work in the limited categories they have formed over the years. When they cannot, they stop and get frustrated, then move on to find something more familiar.

People seeing dozens of them side by side for the first time remark that the artwork could have been painted by 20 different artists of the same genre.

What happens when a viewer of my artwork cannot find some personal foundation for them on which to stand firmly and safely? They get frustrated, say thank you, and move on. I’ve asked many people what they liked initially, and all say a variety of things: love the colors, the whole composition is soothing, the combination of color and movement makes them stare at it for long periods.

Okay, but are these reasons enough to build a following of this new genre?

The answer lies in people’s initial gut reactions to seeing the artwork. They’re like a child again, exploring and discovering and analyzing. Then within ten seconds, the evil grownup emerges and takes over, spoiling all the fun, tossing about all the presents, and demanding to get the hell outta there and go home. I’ve seen it countless times at gallery shows, the homes of friends, and other venues. The pattern is striking, too, and definitely quite frustrating for me to observe. I almost want to stop the midstream metamorphosis of child to grownup and shake them back to their childhood, so I can have a meaningful dialogue with that child about what she was thinking, feeling, sensing when viewing the artwork.

When you see me shake people like rag dolls, you’ll know the reason.

How would one describe these paintings on a more quantitative basis? For one, there’s little randomness about them, although to some people they seem to have a lot of white (random, non-chaotic) noise. One can discern definite patterns in the movements of the brush strokes, with some paintings having characteristic patterns that repeat over and over within the same painting. Some strictly swirls to the left, then the right. Others with brush strokes to the right in straight lines on the under layers, then up and down on the top layers. There are also many different styles among all the paintings, encouraging some people to comment that the paintings appear to have been done by 20 different artists. I contend that each painting reflects a mood at the moment of creation, something that was influencing my thoughts and creating a unique representation of my so-called real world, or my twisted interpretation of it at the time. The more I have explored different styles, the more I have created paintings that I and others consider truly beautiful and unique, although those same people also tell me they don’t know how to describe or categorize them. I’m fine with this. For now.

Nature is a series of non-random images, styles and patterns that has forced the evolution of our various sensory modalities to conform to it in strict fashion, so we can see and discern it, make some sense of it that is meaningful to us humans so we can evolve into something without a tail and maybe develop that opposable thumb. This means, in a nutshell, that Mother Nature is the dictator of what we see, smell, taste, feel and hear, and therefore has built us from the ground up to perceive her in the most accurate way possible, sometimes with little room for anomalies. Or mutations

If we extend this argument to creating art, we see a definite pattern of conformity by most artists to nature’s principles, laws and mandates. Artists try hard to faithfully reproduce nature, with some of us occasionally straying from the norm and creating out-of-the-box renditions of what we feel nature is to us, or how we feel it should be displayed and represented in an ideal or fantastic world.

Nature is a series of non-random images, styles and patterns that has forced the evolution of our various sensory modalities to conform to it in strict fashion, so we can see and discern it, make some sense of it that is meaningful to us humans so we can evolve into something without a tail and maybe develop that opposable thumb.

Personally, I love to view the National Geographic-style image of the world: highly artistic in composition, colorful, creative, mood- and thought-provoking, moving. Oh, and completely realistic on all levels. I also love the slightly blurry and fuzzy effects I sometimes see in nature photography, trying to convey the thrill of motion and movements of water, people, animals, clouds, etc. And I love the intentionally blurry paintings of Monet and Renoir, which extend my visual palate well beyond the photoreal interpretation of scenes I’m used to seeing in situ. To me, the latter is the most creative form of representing an image of nature. Ever. Why? Because it means an evolved higher humanoid form dreamed up something fantastic and dared to express it as art.

All this said, is it possible to build a following of faithful viewers and buyers of tranquil impressionism? I say a resounding yes, because I’ve already witnessed the initial reactions of people to my artwork, when those people allow the child inside them to connect with the real world at that moment and control their responses to the art. It’s only when people “wake up” from their adolescent reverie do they engage their conscious mind, which then turns the whole scene into a train wreck.

So what to do about all this hullabaloo?

I’m patient.

I also believe that it will take time, maybe even considerable time, to find a following. It also will take more time for the art world, for all its snobs and elitists, to adopt tranquil impressionism as a full-on member of the world of art.

When I examine my artwork, I imagine a very quirky child who lives in a universe of bright colors, textures, sounds, patterns and styles, and who is, thanks in no small part to Mother Nature, overconfident enough to think he can conjure up his representation, his personal opinion, of that universe, maybe something others will love as much as he does. . . .

Hey, we’re all entitled to our wild dreams, and I’m all about dreaming big and wild and otherworldly.

Here’re four paintings from late 2009, when I began experimenting deeper with image depth. Each of these paintings has up to a hundred individual layers of paint, using at least one particular swirl or swish or stroke of some kind. I wonder what 2010 will bring.

More important, perhaps, I wonder if the minds of beholders see enough of nature and the familiar to embrace my work. Is it possible to introduce something entirely different, something no one’s actually seen before, and have people appreciate and enjoy it?

Too many questions.

Methinks it’s time to just let things happen “naturally.” After all, the Universe works in ways that I cannot as yet predict, so I’m going to surrender to it and see where all this goes. . . .

Bloodsmoke

Torrenta

Incendiara

Quantoretto

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

In the end, you produce your own script, show it to friends and friends of friends, get a break at Sundance, then, with nothing short of sweet irony, land a $5M deal with a Hollywood distributor.

Yes, you bucked the system, doing what you felt was right and fair, i.e. getting your script out there and onto the big screen, but did you change anything about the system itself?

No.

You were an anomaly, and Hollywood ignored your insignificant radar dot and branded you one of those outliers that come along every ten years. Not worth changing the system for you and that huge freak wave you created and rode in on.

Or is it?

There’re hundreds, if not thousands, of ways to define what is good, what is success, what is worthy of our time, our eyes, our minds. Researchers of the past have insisted that, if “important” people take notice of you and your work, then you must be worthy of everyone else, too.

What crap.

The beliefs of a few have now been allowed to define what stands for important and good and worthy, while ignoring or discarding altogether highly relevant information that could prove useful to us if we only had access to it. Google is supremely guilty of this strategy, using the ill-defined models of what some researchers call “giants,” i.e. those other researchers who took ideas from other “giants” and further developed their own hypotheses, which in turn served as a starting point for subsequent researchers’ work.

My biggest argument against Google’s PageRank system is that it is highly elitist and biased, based on links with so-called “important” pages.

How does one decide what’s important? When in doubt, as were Sergei Brin and Larry Page, Google’s founders, draw up a matrix and let it decide for you. Brin and Page employed a square transition matrix, which ranked all possible “important” pages to each other. The more an intelligent surfer clicked on “important” links, the higher the rank for that page and hence for those pages that linked to it or were referred to it by other “important” pages. The math is more complicated than I suggest here, but the result is the same: inaccurate and irrelevant information.

Again, how does Google decide what’s “important”?

Simple: “A Web page is important if it is pointed to by other important pages.”

What about those obscure mavericks that lie at the margins of the worldwide web? Like our screenwriter above, these outliers do not play the Hollywood game, don’t know anyone “important,” they make up their own rules, and ultimately find their way into the mainstream by virtue of generating their own success, popularity and following.

What passes for “important” to Google is irrelevant to me, much like trying to shop for superior cabinetware at Lowe’s or HomeDepot, which carry only the “popular” and “important” brands that America wants and needs.

PageRank ignores truly excellent websites and pages that provide information and intel that is far superior to that found in the mainstream. So how to find these obscure sites? I liken it to doing basic research: ask a question, develop a working hypothesis, test it by going out in the field and playing around, getting dirty, gathering information and data, make sense of those data, refine your hypothesis, test and test some more. For doing research on the web, it’s much the same, except it entails looking up keywords and following their trails to far-off points on the web.

For example, I might be interested in looking for all relevant information and intel on a  United States banknote that was given to Peru in the late 1870s. Where to start? Google might have you type in the whole phrase, to start, then see what that generates. It gave me nonsensical information. I then refined it to “Peru debt to U.S.” and got information about Peru’s debt for conservation agreements with the U.S., but nothing about that bank note that was issued to Peru more than 100 years ago. You’d think this would be easy, since there’re millions of websites and millions more pages out there on all subjects.

With more refining, more searching, I still find nothing useful. Google has failed me, yes? Well, my work is only as good as my keywords, so I try different combinations, discover a few more interesting facts about Peru’s debt to the US, and then add some of those additional details.

The end result?

All the information and intel I find is buried deep in the most obscure websites and pages possible. They’re not the least bit “important” to Google, they have a zero PageRank, and would never have been found had I not spent considerable time researching this topic. Yet, Google would have me believe that those initial sites and pages it did generate on my behalf were “important” to me and my research.

Google PageRank is highly elitist and biased and, therefore, inaccurate. What’s perhaps worst of all is that this deeply flawed rank system perpetuates bad information and intel. Just because something is popular doesn’t necessarily mean it’s accurate.

What passes for “important” to Google is irrelevant to me, much like trying to shop for superior cabinetware at Lowe’s or HomeDepot, which carry only the “popular” and “important” brands that America wants and needs.

How to get around Google’s elitism and bias? Be willing to dig deeply into your subject, using many different combinations of keywords and phrases.

Of course, when in doubt, or when you’re just fed up with Google’s elitist and biased PageRank system, why not just ask a reference librarian?

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

“Paper credit never was long supported in any country, on a national scale, where it was not founded on a joint basis of public and private credit. An attempt to establish it on public credit alone, in France, under the auspices of Mr. Law, had nearly ruined the kingdom. We have seen the effects of it in America; and every successive experiment, proves the futility of the attempt.

“Our new money is depreciating almost as fast as the old; though it has, in some States, as real funds as paper money ever had. The reason is, that the moneyed men have not an immediate interest to uphold its credit. They may even, in many ways, find it their interest to undermine it. The only certain manner to obtain a permanent paper credit, is to engage, the moneyed interest immediately in it, by making them contribute the whole, or part of the Stock, and giving them the whole, or part of the profits.

“The only certain manner to obtain a permanent paper credit is to engage the moneyed interest immediately in it by making them contribute the whole, or part of the Stock, and giving them the whole, or part of the profits.”

“The invention of Banks, on the modern principle, originated in Venice. There the public, and a Company of moneyed men, are mutually concerned. The Bank of England unites public authority and faith with private credit: and hence we see, what a vast fabric of paper credit is raised on a visionary basis. Had it not been for this, England would never have found sufficient funds to carry on her wars: but, with the help of this, she has done, and is doing, wonders. The Bank of Amsterdam is on a similar foundation.”

Mayer Amschel Rothschild had his hands all over Alexander Hamilton long before Hamilton proposed the scheme of creating a central bank in the nascent United States to Congress. He had first gotten his marching orders from Rothschild, cleverly disguised the orders as his own device, then sent passionate missives to some of his colleagues, in particular, James Duane, who also was opposed to the independence of the United States and wished to see it reunite with Great Britain. Hamilton wrote further:

“And why can we not have an American Bank? Are our moneyed men less enlightened to their own interest, or less enterprising in the pursuit? I believe the fault is in Government, which does not exert itself to engage them in such a scheme. It is true, the individuals in America are not very rich; but this would not prevent their instituting a Bank; it would only prevent its being done with such ample funds as in other countries. Have they not sufficient confidence in the Government, and in the issue of the cause?

“Let the Government endeavor to inspire that confidence, by adopting the measures I have recommended, or others equivalent to them. Let it exert itself to procure a solid Confederation; to establish a good plan of executive administration; to form a permanent military force; to obtain, at all events, a foreign loan. If these things were in a train of vigorous execution, it would give a new spring to our affairs; Government would recover its respectability, and individuals would renounce their diffidence.”

Forever pursuing foreign loans, Hamilton almost immediate dropped the United States into a terrible debt. . . .

Forever pursuing foreign loans, Hamilton almost immediate dropped the United States into a terrible debt. . . .

“The object I should propose to myself, in the first instance, from a Bank, would be an auxiliary mode of supplies; for which purpose, contracts should be made, between Government and the Bank, on terms liberal and advantageous to the latter. Everything should be done, in the first instance, to encourage the Bank. After it gets well established, it will take care of itself; and Government may make the best terms it can, for itself.”

This “Bank” that Hamilton proposed was a private institution that was to be sheltered by the US government.

“The first step to establishing the Bank, will be to engage a number of moneyed men of influence to relish the project, and make it a business. The subscribers to that lately established, are the fittest persons that can be found; and their plan may be interwoven. The outlines of my plan would be, to open subscriptions in all the States for the Stock, which we will suppose to be one million of pounds. Real property of every kind, as well as specie, should be deemed good Stock; but at least a fourth part of the subscription should be in specie, or plate.

This “Bank” that Hamilton proposed was a private institution that was to be sheltered by the US government.

“There should be one great Company, in three divisions: in Virginia, Philadelphia, and at Boston; or two at Philadelphia and Boston. The Bank should have a right to issue Bank notes, bearing two per cent interest, for the whole of their stock; but not to exceed it. These notes may be payable every three months, or oftener: and the faith of government must be pledged for the support of the Bank. It must therefore have a right, from time to time, to inspect its operations, and must appoint inspectors for the purpose.”

Benjamin Franklin had already designed and built a system of currency that kept the colonies in good fiscal standing, but Hamilton immediately and vigorously drove the US into debt with the Bank’s issuing notes at 2% interest, paid annually in gold and silver.

Benjamin Franklin had already designed and built a system of currency that kept the colonies in good fiscal standing, but Hamilton immediately and vigorously drove the US into debt with the Bank’s issuing notes at 2% interest, paid annually in gold and silver.

“The advantages of the Bank may consist in this: in the profits of the contracts made with Government, which should bear interest to be annually paid in specie; in the loan of money at interest, say six per cent; in purchasing lives by annuities, as practised in England, etc. The benefit resulting to the Company, is evident from the consideration, that they may employ, in circulation, a great deal more money than they have specie in Stock, on the credit of the real property which they will have in other use.

“This money will be employed, either in fulfilling their contracts with the public, by which also they will gain a profit ; or in loans at an advantageous interest, or in annuities. The Bank may be allowed to purchase plate and bullion, and coin money ; allowing Government a part of the profit. I make the Bank notes bear interest, to obtain a readier currency, and to induce the holders to prefer them to specie, to prevent too great a run upon the Bank, at any time, beyond its ability to pay.”

The Rothschilds were all too familiar with the process of runs on European banks during times of strife, something that was made keenly aware to Hamilton, who was instructed to encourage people to value the paper currency more than gold or silver bullion, thus preventing a run on Hamilton’s central banks.

“If Government can obtain a foreign loan, it should lend to the Bank, on easy terms, to extend its influence, and facilitate a compliance with its engagements. If Government could engage the States to raise a sum of money in specie, to be deposited in Bank in the same manner, it would be of the greatest consequence. If Government could prevail on the enthusiasm of the people, to make a contribution in plate for the same purpose, it would be a master-stroke.

“Things of this kind sometimes succeed in popular contests; and, if undertaken with address, I should not despair of its success: but I should not be sanguine. The Bank may be instituted for a term of years by way of trial; and the particular privilege of coining money, be for a term still shorter. A temporary transfer of it to a particular Company, can have no inconvenience, as the Government are in no condition to improve this resource; nor could it, in our circumstances, be an object to them; though, with the industry of a knot of individuals, it might be a valuable one to them.”

Hamilton suggested that states raise money in the form of gold or silver bullion, which was to be deposited in the central banks. He also stated his desire to encourage people to deposit their holdings in bullion in the Banks, rather than mere paper money. Hamilton believed more in gold and silver bullion than in his own currency.

“A Bank of this kind, even in its commencement, would answer the most valuable purposes to Government and to the proprietors : in its progress, the advantages will exceed calculation. It will promote commerce, by furnishing a more extensive medium, which we greatly want, in our circumstances. I mean a more extensive valuable medium. We have an enormous nominal one at this time, but it is only a name. In the present unsettled state of things in this country, we can hardly draw inferences from what has happened in others; otherwise I should be certain of the success of this scheme: but I think it has enough in its favor to be worthy of trial. I have only skimmed the surface of the different subjects I have introduced.

Should the plans recommended come into contemplation, in earnest, and you desire my further thoughts, I will endeavor to give them more form and particularity. I am persuaded a solid Confederation, a permanent army, a reasonable prospect of subsisting it, would give us treble consideration in Europe, and produce a peace this winter. If a Convention is called, the minds of all the States, and the people, ought to be prepared to receive its determinations by sensible and popular writings, which should conform to the views of Congress.There are epochs in human affairs when novelty even is useful.

“If a general opinion prevails that the old way is bad, whether true or false, and this obstructs or relaxes the operations of the public service, a change is necessary, if it be but for the sake of change. This is exactly the case now. ‘Tis a universal sentiment, that our present system is a bad one, and that things do not go right on this account. The measure of a Convention would revive the hopes of the people, and give a new direction to their passions, which may be improved in carrying points of substantial utility. The eastern States have already pointed out this mode to Congress: they ought to take the hint and anticipate the others.

“And, in future, my dear sir, two things let me recommend, as fundamental rules for the conduct of Congress: to attach the army to them by every motive; to maintain an air of authority (not domineering) in all their measures with the States. The manner in which a thing is done, has more influence than is commonly imagined. Men are governed by opinion: this opinion is as much influenced by appearances as by realities. If a Government appears to be confident of its own powers, it is the surest way to inspire the same confidence in others. If it is diffident, it may be certain there will be a still greater diffidence in others; and that its authority will not only be distrusted, controverted, but contemned.

In the end, Hamilton turned out not only to be a traitor to this country, but also a weak-spined man: Aaron Burr shot him in the abdomen in their private duel on July 11, 1804 outside Weehawken, New Jersey. In letters to his wife shortly before the duel, Hamilton suggested he could not take a human life. Interestingly, too, Hamilton’s son, Philip,  also had died in a duel with a man who had no compunction about using his weapon

“I wish, too, Congress would always consider, that a kindness consists as much in the manner as in the thing. The best things done hesitatingly, and with an ill grace, lose their effect, and produce disgust rather than satisfaction or gratitude. In what Congress have at any time done for the army, they have commonly been too late. They have seemed to yield to importunity, rather than to sentiments of justice or to a regard to the accommodation of their troops. An attention to this idea, is of more importance than it may be thought. I, who have seen all the workings and progress of the present discontents, am convinced, that a want of this has not been among the most inconsiderable causes.

“You will perceive, my dear sir, this letter is hastily written, and with a confidential freedom: not as to a member of Congress, whose feelings may be sore at the prevailing clamors; but as to a friend, who is in a situation to remedy public disorders; who wishes for nothing so much as truth; and who is desirous of information, even from those less capable of judging than himself. I have not even time to correct and copy; and only enough to add, that I am, very truly and affectionately, dear sir,

Your most obedient servant,

A. HAMILTON.

In the end, Hamilton turned out not only to be a traitor to this country, but also a weak-spined man: Aaron Burr shot him in the abdomen in their private duel on July 11, 1804 outside Weehawken, New Jersey. In letters to his wife shortly before the duel, Hamilton suggested he could not take a human life.

Like the no-spined squishes who followed him–namely Zbigniew Brzezinski and his sons, plus all the Rothschild bankers and their spawn–Hamilton had no problem betraying his fellow Americans by undermining any law, whether moral or legal, that stood in his path.

Spineless characters like Hamilton, the Brzezinskis and the Rothschilds are too weak, too scared and too effeminate to actually engage the enemy up close and personal in mortal combat, so they employ jackals to do their black work.

Not surprisingly, too, Hamilton’s son, Philip,  also died in a duel with a man who had no compunction about actually using his weapon. Spineless character ran deeply in the Hamilton brood. . . .

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

2. The United States Federal Reserve Bank is NOT a U.S. government institution.

3. The Federal Reserve is a PRIVATE bank, which is wholly owned and controlled by the family Rothschild.

4. The Federal Reserve was established in 1913 illegally, when the Rothschild’s lieutenant, U.S. Senator Nelson Aldrich, forced through a Congressional bill that mandated it.

5. The family Rothschild is directly responsible for starting all major, and many minor, wars over the past 230 years.

6. The family Rothschild is directly responsible for every recession and depression in the United States over the past 210 years.

7. The family Rothschild (The First Sphere of Influence) controls all major banking throughout the entire world, and has the power to bankrupt entire countries.

8. Thomas Jefferson fought vehemently against Alexander Hamilton to ensure that the newly created United States would NOT fall under the control of the Rothschilds. Jefferson said that the Rothschilds were a greater threat to our country than any standing army.

9. Andrew Jackson also fought to thwart all the efforts of the Rothschilds, and was able to do so during his term. When his term was up, the Rothschilds installed their own U.S. president and then, in a retaliatory measure, plunged America into its first depression.

10. The Rothschilds have assassinated four U.S. presidents, who refused to toe the Rothschild line, and are thought to have murdered others, although the evidence for the latter is as yet inconclusive.

11. BONUS FACT #1: the Rothschilds are wholly responsible for the deaths and murders and assassinations of tens of millions of human beings worldwide.

12. BONUS FACT #2: The Rothschild henchmen are Zbigniew Brzezinski and his sons. Forget Kissinger; he’s an idiot.

*****END OF COMMUNICATION*****

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

My hypothesis about a future Japan is that they will somehow be allowed, if not ordered by TFSI, to ramp up their offensive rearming and wage war against any foreign nation, an act that is now restricted by Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution.

While some of the mass-media commentary are, in context, accurate, they do not address the startling fact that this machination is all part of the grand plan of the The First Sphere of Influence (TFSI), which, among many other worldwide actions, seeks to destroy Japan’s economy . . . then force the Japanese government to take out massive, high-interest loans from TFSI so the failed nation can recover.

During the recovery period, Japan will be further in TFSI’s deep grasp, having to bow to inexorable pressure on all levels. Thus, Japan becomes another full-fledged pawn of The First Sphere of Influence.

My hypothesis about a future Japan is that they will somehow be allowed, if not ordered by TFSI, to ramp up their offensive rearming and wage war against any foreign nation, an act that is now restricted by Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution. Article 9 will be abolished by TFSI, or rewritten in a way that legally allows them to engage in combat against other countries. TFSI will use Japan as an offensive martial pawn against China and/or North Korea. Again, my hypothesis.

Where else are we seeing this phenomenon? One egregious example: Dubai, United Arab Emirates. The First Sphere of Influence crushed Dubai in one fell swoop last year, causing a massive panic in the Arab world, and driving off most investors in Dubai’s various construction projects. Even as early as May, 2009, when I visited Dubai and saw the idle construction work, it was readily apparent to me that something large and dark and sinister was at play there. It was a ghost town, and TFSI was, and still is, responsible for the loss of life. The bitter irony, from our point of view, is that Dubai then hired Rothschild family members as consultants to get them back on track. From the point of view of the Rothschilds, it was a planned move, no irony in sight.

Ah, forgot one little item: the mass media are wholly owned and operated by The First Sphere of Influence.

And that brings me to a future topic, i.e. how do We the People get good, solid, accurate information about world, national and local events? I’ll answer that one soon. Please check back. . . .

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

When I did my last security mission, this one in 2007, I was sure that I wouldn’t make it back home. So sure that I did something I’d never done before: left a “death letter” to anyone who found it. It was addressed to Dear Reader, not some family member or friend or colleague. Just the person who discovered it and took the time to read it. As I wrote it, tears filled my eyes and I cried the whole time, knowing this would be the end of all I had done in life, all I had worked for over almost 30 years as an adult. And when I’d signed it, the tears ceased and I felt a new resolve.

During that last mission, everything that could go wrong did go wrong. It wasn’t that I wasn’t in my best shape or frame of mind. I was in that zone. I felt incredibly alive and strong and fast. And it was at that very time that the Universe decided to challenge me like never before, throwing one bad guy and nasty incident at me after another. It was like a violent video game, running away from one butthead I’d just dispatched, only to find another and another. It seemed never to end, all this violence.

In the end, though, I had only run into two people who wanted my client dead. Two. Those two, in my shot mind, had morphed into 30. I swear I used up all my clips of ammo on those 30 guys. I swear. And I shot and killed every one of them.

All two of them. . . .

When it was over and my client was safely ensconced in a safe haven, I limped back home and fell into a deep sleep that seemed to last years. It was only a couple of days, though. Spent, I went to my computer to see what had gone on in the world while I was, uh, away: not much happened in the world while I was out searching for peace, freedom and democracy. After a twelve-pack of Beck’s–or was it Heineken?–I was alive again and ready to face the world. That’s when I saw the death letter, resting comfortably in front of my computer monitor, Dear Reader emblazoned across the front in bold hand-scratched black marker.

In it, I’d said the most outrageous things, stuff like: if I had to do it all over again, I would’ve started killing bad guys the moment I left high school. Or this gem: That night I was aboard that guy’s boat, looking at all the memorabilia he’d safely tucked away over a lifetime, I was deeply saddened that there were no pictures of him with anyone. Not a single picture in the entire place. Beautiful yacht, yes. But empty and cold, lacking in any humanness. I also said crap like, if I ever meet the woman of my dreams, she’ll be a few years older and wiser, and more than I ever wished for. Dumb stuff.

As I read more of President Jefferson’s thoughts and ideas and beliefs, I am struck by how he, too, struggled day to day with life’s vicissitudes, yet somehow managed to come out on the other end, all the wiser. He had to deal with men who were more comfortable with the status quo, i.e. toeing the line of King George and his handler, Mayer Amschel Rothschild. It must’ve been difficult to persuade these weak men to adopt the idea of Peace, Freedom and a Constitutional Republic, esp. in the face of incredible odds.

Weak men are in abundance nowadays. So too were they in the 1770s. Ironically, perhaps, they’re the ones who normally prevail, as people like President Jefferson take to the front lines and get shot, stabbed and massacred long before the weak-dicks ever see the fires of combat. It’s true that we do indeed leave our heroes on the battlefield, although many weak-dick survivors would have you believe otherwise.

People ask me what a Jeffersonian Patriot is. Simple: someone who espouses and fights for Peace, Freedom and a Constitutional Republic.

Period.

Any questions?

Oh, I have one for you: given I continually put my ass on the line as a Jeffersonian Patriot, what are YOU willing to do, to gain back this beautiful country of ours? Huh, huh? Are YOU willing to fight to the death, whether it is YOUR death? I am and I have. Repeatedly. Are YOU? If not, then please go away. If so, I need your support in the coming months and years. . . .

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

When the interviewer then asked Mr. Muir, the big man was deep into checking out a home video on his cam, but politely turned his head every so slightly to look at the photograph and said, confidently, “He looks like a crook.” He then repaired to the cam again.

The announcer parroted: “He looks like a crook? Why?”

Mr. Muir pulled his head away from his cam and continued, a little more confidence this time, like he was on to something big: “He just got that look about him, man, like, he just out to take everything you own.”

Man, that’s chemistry for you: bacteria know a predator when they detect one, dogs know evil when they sniff it or lick it, and we humans know, too, when evil is lurking in our midst.

When the interviewer then asked Mr. Muir, the big man was deep into checking out a home video on his cam, but politely turned his head every so slightly to look at the photograph and said, confidently, “He looks like a crook.” He then repaired to the cam again.

The announcer parroted: “He looks like a crook? Why?”

Mr. Muir pulled his head away from his cam and continued, a little more confidence this time, like he was on to something big: “He just got that look about him, man, like, he just out to take everything you own.”

Man, that’s chemistry for you: bacteria know a predator when they detect one, dogs know evil when they sniff it or lick it, and we humans know, too, when evil is lurking in our midst.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

This elitist black woman was telling a group that was 99% white, well educated, conservative, and lovers of Thomas Jefferson that their idol is–how did she present it?–overrated.

As you doubtless know, Alexander Hamilton was a lieutenant of the Rothschilds, and was instrumental in establishing The First Bank of the United States, chartered on February 25, 1791. The Rothschilds insisted that it receive a lengthy charter, so Hamilton forced through “measures” (personally, I feel that these measures were more coercion and threats to our real Founding Fathers) that gave the bank a 20-year charter, thus enslaving the people of the United States under its first official debt.

Before the bank existed, Benjamin Franklin et al. had in place a means of printing the colonies’ own money, much to the ire of German banker Mayer Amschel Rothschild, who ordered Hamilton into action. As Secretary of the Treasury, Traitor Hamilton was able to effect precisely what Rothschild commanded, which was to force the newly created United States finally to render unto Caesar. Rothschild fancied himself a modern-day Caesar who took whatever he wanted from whoever he wanted, and Mayer Amschel Caesar was very eager to regain his just blood money, something he clearly failed to do during the American Revolution.

Dr. Rice then told the audience of the world’s seemingly greatest threat, China, but then went onto to explain that China wouldn’t dare start a war with the US, because it has too much to lose. The fact is, China is also tightly controlled by The First Sphere of Influence, so her point is completely irrelevant. What she did add, though, was that the true threats to our nation’s security were “failed states” and “failing nations.”

“Afghanistan is our biggest threat today,” she said. “It’s a failed state.” She went to characterize the country as filled with “dangerous peaks and nothing else but dust.”

This elitist black woman was telling a group that was 99% white, well educated, conservative, and lovers of Thomas Jefferson that their idol is–how did she present it?–overrated.

Hmmm. I’ve been to Afghanistan 12 times and have run my boots up into the beautiful mountains and down into the lowest fertile valleys. Yes, there is lots of dust, if you spend all your time in the capital city of Kabul. And that’s because it’s a dirt town with dirt roads and mostly dirt thoroughfares, and a population of four million men (some women, but I never saw one) who stir up all that dust every single day. When you walk through Kabul, you notice two things: a city of men and a city of dust. Maybe this was what Dr. Rice was referring to. Lady Rice may have set foot in some secure area of Kabul, yes, but the lady hasn’t ventured far beyond the safety of her hotel room, surrounded by special-operations forces bodyguards.

In truth, Afghanistan has existed for more than 2,000 years, fought off nearly every invader, massacred elements of the world’s greatest armies’, including Great Britain, the former Soviet Union, and the United States. So let’s not label Afghanistan a “failed state,” Dr. Rice. To do so gives prospective invaders a license to occupy the country and inflict their own policies on a largely failed and impotent central government that is not recognized by the outlying villages, which have their own stable system of government.

I could argue how Afghanistan is not a “failed state,” as Dr. Rice put it, but I’d like to move on. . . .

“Al Qaeda is still a major threat,” she said.

Al Qaeda is a product of our own Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Yes, still.

I’m still trying to fathom how Dr. Rice and people like her keep toeing the line for The First Sphere of Influence, even though they know that word to the contrary is getting out. And its diffusion into worldwide ears is accelerating, too.

For those of you who haven’t heard: al Qaeda is a creation of CIA. The leader of al Qaeda, a bandit known as Tim Osman, has been on the CIA’s payroll for more than a dozen years. If you wish to see a tear sheet from the CIA, showing Osman’s affiliation with the agency, please email me via the CONTACT US page. Oh, if you’re wondering who Tim Osman is, please consider this: it’s the CIA’s code name for Osama bin Laden.

While Dr. Rice didn’t necessarily foment trouble, her soft-spoken tone and demeanor clearly projected her agenda: toe the line for The First Sphere of Influence and ensure that the good people of Sarasota were fed the same shit as other civic-minded groups across this country were slurping up. Voraciously, too.

We the People are eager for the truth. Thing is, People, you’re not going to get it from a lieutenant of the Brzezinski Cartel, which is the geopolitical henchman of the Rothschild family. Period.

During Dr. Rice’s presentation, she had the audacity to mention our beloved US military and how “they are fighting for our freedom.” She failed to mention that we are fighting THEM, i.e. The First Sphere of Influence, for our freedom and our very lives, and we will be doing so until we prevail. Ya gotta admit, though: the girl has balls and she bought them from, and had them installed by, the same shop that did Obama’s.

Forgive me for leaving out the best part of her presentation: Dr. Rice looked absatutely killer in that power-plum pantsuit and five-inch stiletto kicks.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

Out of the 100-plus people I’ve asked so far, only one person knew the correct answers. One. My guess is that when I ask another thousand, there will still be that one lone dude, Paul. What crushed me is how he answered the questions–with a heavy heart, as if knowing there was absolutely nothing he could do about it.

So this brings me to the topic, The New American Revolution. So, uh, yeah, okay, when do we start?

The good news is that The First Sphere of Influence is a living, breathing entity. And that means only one thing to me . . . We can kill it.

How much new information and intel do you need to drive you beyond that tipping point, beyond which you stand up and do something? Will The First Sphere of Influence have to tax you more, like they are with the new carbon taxing scheme? Will they have to strip you of more Constitutional freedom and rights, as they have with the passage and increasing implementation of The Patriot Act and all the subsequent Executive Orders? Will they have to install CCTV video cams in your neighborhood, thus dissolving more and more of your privacy?

Right now, my friend, you’re being slowly boiled alive by The First Sphere of Influence. They’ve tried to boil us over the years, but we’ve fought back successfully. They made a huge push into our lives after WW II, as we were still licking our wounds and were too dizzy to notice, when they established the Central Intelligence Agency, United Nations, International Monetary Fund, etc. Interestingly, they do this a lot: start a war, make oodles of cash, then stop it right in the middle of a good part so we’re stunned, creating the perfect diversion for their introduction of these new organizations, laws, and future world leaders. History has repeated itself quite nicely and accurately over the past several hundred years, and has largely gone unnoticed by the populous.

Until now.

I’ve said this before, and it bears repeating: the advent of modern and sophisticated communications technology, coupled with the rise in selfishness among generations following the wild-west ’60s, and the subsequent removal by The First Sphere of Influence of our civil rights is helping us commoners spread the word about The First Sphere of Influence. They feel it, too. Witness the events of the past ten years and you’ll feel it, too. False-flag operations like 9/11 ushered in a slew of new laws and restrictions that weren’t even voted on by our benevolent Congress. It happened in the UK, too, slamming through of new arcane rights restrictions, none of which were subject to a vote by their Parliament. Not one.

Over the past ten years, unlike ever before, we’ve seen the systematic dismantling of our constitutional republic’s structure, outpaced by the anabolism of a new global corporate structure that has largely taken over our once-proud government. Slowly, The First Sphere of Influence has invaded our government and, like a slowly metastasizing cancer, each of our bodies.

The good news is that The First Sphere of Influence is a living, breathing entity. And that means only one thing to me . . . We can kill it.

So, when do we start?

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

Nanopool GmbH, based in Schwalbach, Germany, is introducing a revolutionary nanotech product that will surely be a market-killer of these US-made household cleaning and coating products. Plastic, glass, ceramics, wood, textiles, metal and stone all can now be coated with a specific “np-coating,” adjusted and formulated for each surface type.

No more rust? Np-coated metals protects against corrosion, rust, abrasion, water damage, oil damage, electrolyis, and microbial intrusion.

When graffiti is spray-painted onto normal concrete, sandstone or metal surfaces, its particles diffuse into the actual substrate and cling tightly to it, sometimes making it impossible to remove, even with strong abrasives and high-pressure water jets. With an np-coating, graffiti easily washes away, using only paint remover and the short application of a high-pressure water jet.

Your expensive silk dress can now receive an np-coating, making it 100% protected from harmful oils, soil and dirt, light abrasion, water damage, paints and other products that cause staining or discoloration. Np-coated textiles also protect against acids and bases, oxidation, UV radiation, electrical burns, etc. Pour of bottle of wine on your beautiful, np-coated sil dress and the wine runs off like rain from a window. Plus, np-coatings are very flexible, allowing your dress to, uh, expand, if necessary.

No more rust? Np-coated metals protects against corrosion, rust, abrasion, water damage, oil damage, electrolyis, and microbial intrusion.

For ceramics and glass, a simple once-a-year np-coating will protect against water damage, oil damage, abrasion, food stains, microbial attack, and provide a surface that’s very easy to clean: just use mild soap and water.

Works of art now can be coated with np-coatings that protect against graffiti, water and oil damage, microbial attack, etc.

Sterility is a major challenge for hospitals and research institutions. Np-coated materials are 100% protected from microbial intrusion and damage. The possibilities are limitless.

One wonders, though, what happens to the breakdown products of the nanoscopic glass particles when they degrade after a year or so.

Np-coatings are breathable, i.e. they act as semi-permeable membranes that allow oxygen and other gas molecules to diffuse across their 100-nanometer-thick layer. They can be sprayed on fruits and vegetables and protect them from the types of damages listed for other surfaces above.

One wonders, though, what happens to the breakdown products of the nanoscopic glass particles when they degrade after a year or so. Are they like asbestos, a glass fiber-like molecule that invades the lungs and punctures delicate tissues, causing cancer? When will we know the health and environmental effects of these np-coatings? As with other innovations of the past, well after the harm is done.

Ah, but let’s not lose sight of the pros of this revolutionary nanotech product!

Not only are all our surfaces protected from harm, they’re now easy to clean, using soap and water and, in some cases, mild cleaners. So maybe Ajax and Windex aren’t gone just yet. At least until the next cool nanotech product hits the market.

For more information, please visit: nanopool.eu

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

When I’ve seen a bully or bullies beating up on a defenseless person or persons, I’ve stepped in. Swiftly. Violently. And with excellent results. I flatly refuse to allow bullies to ride roughshod over anyone. Bullies, beware. . . .

The following is a letter I sent to a Tampa, Florida high school principal who endorsed the dismissal of student Mr. Alex Fuentes from the national honor society (sorry, but it doesn’t deserve title caps). Mr. Fuentes publicly criticized his school, Wesley Chapel High School, on his Facebook page, drawing the ire of some of his teachers who voted to dismiss him from the national honor society.

I’m pleased to hear that Mr. Fuentes has since transferred to another high school.

While I also refuse to make every fight my own, some actions simply cannot go unpunished. . . .

3 February 2010

Ms. Carin Nettles

Principal

Wesley Chapel High School

30651 Wells Road

Wesley Chapel, FL 33545

Dear Ms. Nettles,

Dismissing Mr. Alex Fuentes for voicing a First Amendment right, not to mention letting the world know what a crappy school you run, is abominable. You’ve become a Socialist, dear lady, a comrade of a truly despicable regime.

Shame on you.

And don’t you dare challenge me, telling me I’ve not been in your shoes or have no idea what I’m talking about. To the contrary, madam; I’ve schooled and taught and mentored young people all my life, even when I was a young prodigy. I’ve been a scientist (biophysics), US Army Airborne Ranger, corporate mercenary, and now a NY Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books.

I’m pleased to see that Mr. Fuentes has moved on to another school. . . .

Here’s the bitter irony for people like you, those three faculty members who voted to dismiss Mr. Fuentes, and the board of the national honor society (lower caps for emphasis), Ms. Nettle: Alex Fuentes will surpass all your accomplishments in life and do much much better than you sheeple.

By the way, did you know that all your personal income taxes go directly to the Bank of England in London? Right into the coffers of the family Rothschild.

Serves you right, still a slave to the Rothschild empire. . . .

Cheers,

William Dean A. Garner

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

In my own manmade paradise, I should feel blissfully relaxed, happy, and fortunate. But I’m not. My mind–both conscious and subconscious–is racing at the speed of light, sending and receiving hundreds of messages and various inputs from every sector of my brain. I should be curled up with a good book at this hour, nearly 10 pm, but I’m in overdrive, wondering how I’m going to stop The First Sphere of Influence from carrying on.

Simple as that: stop evil from carrying on.

Even now, without aid or backup or any chance of rescue if thugs come for me in my home, I am at peace, one with my surroundings.

In those mad-minute days of security work, I was one with my surroundings, with the air, the warm rain, and the person or persons I was hired to escort and sometimes carry to freedom. I couldn’t see or tell where my hand ended and theirs started, when I grabbed them and dragged them on a forced run through a town or a jungle, fleeing the oppressors who somehow got word of my mission. My strong electric field, I reasoned, deflected the bullets that sometimes flew passed us, always high, thank goodness. Nature and I were one. I couldn’t lose on any level, because even though I had no human support team or backup or the chance of rescue if things went south, nature and all objects and trees and everything I could see was in fluid motion with me, guiding me, sheltering me, protecting me. Again, I was one with . . . everything. I blended in and disappeared, or so I thought. My clients, by virtue of their closeness to me, which was usually hand in hand or arm in arm, also were immune to the senses of our common enemies.

As I think back on those missions thousands of miles from the comfort of my office, then in Santa Barbara, California, paradoxically, I never felt more free, more at ease and peace.

Even now, without aid or backup or any chance of rescue if thugs come for me in my home, I am at peace, one with my surroundings. And with this notion, I do not feel alone. Good thing, too, because I’m going after the greatest threat on the planet, The First Sphere of Influence, which has murdered millions of humans over the past 230 years. This high level of spirituality is my motor. Some people believe in God; I don’t. Some believe in some pagan talisman; I don’t. Some don’t believe in anything at all; I do believe in something greater than I. That something is all of you, those kind souls who read these words that are difficult to swallow. Those decent folk who take the time to write me and tell me about themselves, what they think about the state of our country, and how much they appreciate what some of us are doing to fight tyranny. My spirituality comes from being one with everything, including each of you. I get my strength from knowing you are at least reading this and considering its gravity. I am comforted by your words of encouragement, MK, Fish Man, Javier, Alex, Brian, John, and hundreds of others’ thoughts, ideas, beliefs.

From an impossibly small amount of mass we can get an impossibly large amount of energy. We built the atomic bomb on this notion, and tested it on atolls in the Pacific, wooden huts in the Nevada desert, and on cities in Japan.

What The First Sphere of Influence does not realize is that each of us is capable of unleashing untold power and energy and, when directed and focused just right, can level a city or a mountain.

Dr. Brzezinski and Mssrs. Rothschild bank on our not being able to muster the courage, let alone numbers, to defeat them.

Dr. Brzezinski and Mssrs. Rothschild bank on our not being able to muster the courage, let alone numbers, to defeat them. He laughs at insignificant people like me. Hey, I’m used to being looked at as a zero. Makes it easier to blend into thin air. The arrogance of fascists has played out in violence over the centuries, and that violence has been visited upon them. Like I’ve said before, fascism doesn’t last. Socialism doesn’t last. Communism doesn’t last. Life finds a way to be free. It’s soft-wired into the DNA and RNA of all living things. Try containing a mutant strain of bacteria and what happens? It mutates even further, thus rendering your antibiotic as useless as wet toilet paper. MRSA is a prime example. Ever tried to kill a wood-eating fungus under your house? You’ll always lose. If it doesn’t have dead trees to munch on and reduce to mush, then it goes for the wood frame that holds your house together. It spreads into the walls and floors, up into the roof and under the driveway, until it consumes all the cellulose on your property. Try oppressing a gang of rats that propagate each month and you get a bunch of pissed-off super-rats that invade your home silently and tear it to pieces from the inside out.

Life finds a way to escape the bonds of oppression and, when it does, comes back with a vengeance. It’s called the “rebound effect” and it’s kick-ass to watch.

So how is it that the world’s most prolific con-artists, The First Sphere of Influence, don’t know about basic evolution on this planet?

So how is it that the world’s most prolific con-artists, The First Sphere of Influence, don’t know about basic evolution on this planet? In their own arrogance, they don’t care. Why would they? They’ve ridden roughshod over billions of humans and other life forms for centuries, without significant resistance to stop them completely. When they have been thwarted, they regroup and come back at you from another direction and with a new set of tools. But they’ve yet to be stopped.

In my own arrogance, I think I can stop them. I go to bed at night, dreaming of a special nanovirus that someone gives me. Then someone else flies me over to ZB’s home in McLean, Virginia and to the Rothschild abodes in London and I spray them with this nanovirus that consumes them in minutes. All gone. Someone else then flies me back home and tucks me back into bed, even before my wife awakens.

And then I wake up from my killing reverie and say, “Okay, now what, Dean?”

Good question: now what?

In the coming months, I’ll share with you that what. What I can do. What you can do.

I’m not in this alone, and I thank you for that. . . .

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

Yes, I actually sent it to him, along with the second Letter, both via email (zb@csis.org). This is his full-time office in Washington, DC. And, no, Dr. Brzezinski has not responded to either Letter.

The general rule for a response is, when the target (ZB) becomes sufficiently annoyed, worried, frightened or even desperate, he will reach out to the plaintiff (that would be I). In some cases, it’s been via the executioner who may kill the plaintiff in an “accident” or via outright assassination. In others, a simple visit by two FBI Special Agents. Or a simple phone call to a subordinate in town, who in turn doesn’t call the plaintiff, but rather makes threatening gestures to plaintiff’s wife, an innocent party. And still others: subordinates alert the plaintiff’s web-hosting company that plaintiff is making “antisemitic remarks” and thus must be shut down immediately and permanently.

As you can see, the response can be any number of colorful options, and I fully expect one or more of those sometime soon. Why? Because I’m now writing the next nonfiction book, which will feature The New Declaration of Independence: A Break from The First Sphere of Influence. In this book, I discuss the history of Thomas Jefferson’s original document, which was presented to the Congress on July 4, 1776, where it sat on a table over a weekend, fermenting and gathering momentum that, like the rotation of our own Mother Earth, continues to this very day.

In this book, I also give the rationale for breaking free of the Brzezinksi Cartel and the banking family Rothschild, citing a hundred references from primary sources that date back hundreds of years. For example, did you know that our own Federal Reserve is a private banking institution? Private. That means it’s about as “federal” as Federal Express, and it answers to The Bank of England and the Rothschild family. Did you know that 100% of our personal income taxes in the US ultimately go to The Bank of England and the Rothschild family?

In addition to breaking free from The First Sphere of Influence, I am calling for the abolishment of the Federal Reserve and the U.S. federal (personal) income tax, as well. My aim is to bring America back to its original state of a Democratic Republic, a government of the People, by the People, and for the People of the United States of America. Please check back for future updates and notices about the book. . . .

The emails, too, have been overwhelming: more than 500 at last count. And not one single voice of dissent, opposition or negativity. Not one. That, in itself, is telling. . . .

The emails, too, have been overwhelming: more than 500 at last count. And not one single voice of dissent, opposition or negativity. Not one. That, in itself, is telling: normally when some idiot like me strips down naked for the world to see and puts his head and balls on the chopping block, people come out of the woodwork to take potshots. Didn’t happen this time. Peace, Freedom and Democracy are on everyone’s minds, it seems, and the only words I’ve heard so far are those of kindness and support, and queries that run the gamut from “what can I do?” to “I’ll kill for you” and “You’re my new hero.”

My wife said that we’ve struck a nerve here and I know she’s right. She’s always right, because Alex always does the right thing. Always. We both believe that our country is in shambles and something must be done about it. I’ve told her that I’m sacrificing us for this great cause, and she fully agrees with me.

All it takes for evil to prevail is for good people to do nothing.

We are willing to do whatever it takes to get this word out, even if it means losing our lives to the murderous First Sphere of Influence.

Like Bo Jackson said, “I can take a lick, but I’d rather give one.”

Peace. Freedom. Democracy. Those are the foundation standards of Jeffersonian Democracy. I am not a Republican or Democrat, as the two parties are a sham, i.e. one and the same, although The First Sphere of Influence will have you believe otherwise. I am a Jeffersonian Patriot, someone now doing whatever it takes to ensure our freedoms are restored, maintained and preserved.

Peace.

Freedom.

Democracy.

Thank you,

William Dean A. Garner
Sarasota, Florida

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

Quote in 1865, attributed to an editorial in the Rothschild-owned Hazard Circular – London Times (to the effect):

“If this mischievous financial policy, which has its origin in the North American Republic during the late war in that country, should become indurated down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous without precedent in the history of the world. The brains, and the wealth of all countries will go to North America. That country must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe.”

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski

Center for Strategic and International Studies

1800 K Street

Washington, DC




Dear Dr. Brzezinski,

My open letter to you is spreading like wildfire across the Internet.

Perhaps we should talk sometime. You can educate me about the little details I’ve failed to uncover about you and your evil plans to convert the US into a one-world fascist state.

There will come a day of reckoning, my dear sir. . . .

Sincerely,

Dean

http://thatsjustplumdumb.com/index.php/2010/01/zbigniew-brzezinski-for-your-consideration/

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

The Rothschild-Owned Federal Reserve Bank: "I've got you, my pretties!"

The more people like me speak out about this, the more will scratch their heads and go, “No way!” or “You’re an idiot, Garner!” or, worst of all, “You’re not an American!”

I’ve heard this crap before, and it always comes from ignorant souls who just don’t understand how the political and economic systems work in the western world.

After more than 30 years of anecdotal research, connecting thousands of dots across an endless sky, a distinct pattern begins to emerge, something I’ll share a bit with you here. First, there’re other brave souls out there who also have researched this contentious topic, and have drawn similar conclusions. And we’ve all done so independently, which makes our conclusions all the more striking. I’ve said this before and it bears repeating: the evil family Rothschild, which controls what I term The First Sphere of Influence in the western world, hides in plain sight. They even flaunt their wealth and control and power over us with such arrogance and contempt that it cannot be ignored, even by like-minded people as they.

Where shall I start?

The U.S. income tax was a long sought-after tax the Rothschilds had attempted to bring on since the late 1770s, but it was strongly resisted by Thomas Jefferson, Ben Franklin, James Madison and John Adams, among other less-known (to contemporary audiences) American Patriots. Traitor Alexander Hamilton, a bastard child born in the warm Caribbean, was our first Secretary of the Treasury, sent to the US by the Rothschilds to establish the first central bank. Hamilton had been groomed from the start by the Rothschilds, although few people actually knew of his true identity. Aaron Burr, Hamilton’s killer, knew of his background and often chided and bullied him over it, until Burr finally slapped Hamilton across the face with a leather glove, thus issuing the challenge that killed Hamilton.

While Thomas Jefferson vehemently fought against the creation of such a bank, George Washington believed that Hamilton knew what he was doing and thus must be correct. They bank was started . . . and suddenly plunged the nascent United States into debt.

When the central bank’s charter expired, it was not renewed, so the Rothschilds punished the “Colonies” by having the British attack the US again to commence the War of 1812. When the US “won” the war, once again expelling the RedCoats from our lands, the Rothschilds reveled in their own victory, having established yet another central bank that drained the US taxpayers of their Personal Income.

When this bank’s charter ran its course, the whole Rothschild-US President [Fill In The Blank] battle started again, with one side winning a victory over the other in the ensuing 70 years. Without dredging up reams of references from our beloved annals of history, please note that President Andrew Jackson was instrumental in fighting the Rothschilds, although they tried on numerous occasions to assassinate him.

It wasn’t until 1913 that Senator Nelson Aldrich and his fascist “American Rothschilds” managed to sneak through a bill, during the winter break of the House of Representatives, that imposed a formal personal income tax on all Americans.

Our notion that our personal income taxes go to paying for our country’s infrastructure, social services, military, etc. is inaccurate, to say the least. Our personal income taxes first are collected by the US Treasury via the Internal Revenue Service, which sends the funds to the Federal Reserve, which is NOT a federal bank of any sort. The privately owned Federal Reserve, which is owned by the Rothschilds and, to a smaller extent, other banking families, then sends our tax dollars to its own Bank of England, which is located in the sovereign area of London called The City of London.

Interestingly, The City of London has its own laws, security forces and military, completely independent of the rest of London and the entire United Kingdom. It is considered the most elite banking and economic center in the western world.

The Bank of England, again, owned by the Rothschilds, sends our tax dollars to other central banks, all privately owned, and located in Europe.

Why do we even pay this illegal personal income tax, when our own government can operate without it?

Because our government borrows heavily from the Rothschilds and must pay interest on these loans. Our personal income tax offsets these interest payments. All usurious, of course. And all illegal.

In the coming months, I’ll share more with you. I realize that this information is hard to take, given we’ve been raised on the notion that we live in a free and democratic society, and our hard-earned money goes toward our benevolent US government.

In effect, my fellow Americans, it is all a lie.

The good news is that these bare facts are now more visible than ever and, with sufficient time and effort, people like me will get this word out. We have already seen the power of the American people against the healthcare reform bills: a stunning backlash against the Brzezinski Cartel and The First Sphere of Influence.

Backlashes like we’re seeing now are just the beginning of a new American Revolution, one that we actually win. This time.

More to follow. . . .

[Thank you to Mr. David Dees for permission to use his beautiful and poignant illustration.]

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

Iranian Air Defense Radar: Unknown aircraft, you are in Iranian airspace. Identify yourself.

Aircraft: This is a United States aircraft. I am in Iraqi airspace.

Iranian Air Defense Radar: You are in Iranian airspace. If you do not depart our airspace, we will launch interceptor aircraft!

Aircraft: This is a United States Marine Corps F/A-18 fighter. Send ‘em up. I’ll wait. . . .

Iranian Air Defense Radar:

[End of conversation.]

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

January 21, 2010

China teen seen as hero for killing local official

By GILLIAN WONG

Associated Press Writer

Instead, villagers in the northern town of Xiashuixi have made Li’s teenage killer something of a local hero. More than 20,000 people from the coal-mining area petitioned a court for a lenient sentence.

“I didn’t feel surprised at all when I heard Li Shiming was killed, because people wanted to kill him a long time ago,” said villager Xin Xiaomei, who says her husband was harassed for years by Li after the two men had a personal dispute. “I wanted to kill Li myself, but I was too weak.”

The murder trial has again cast a harsh light on abuses of power by communist cadres and the frustration many ordinary Chinese feel with a one-party system that sometimes allows officials to run their districts like personal fiefdoms.

China’s leaders have identified corruption as a threat to the country’s progress, but an opaque political system dominated by the ruling Communist Party — which brooks no dissent — and the lack of an independent judiciary contribute to the problem.

In the case of party secretary Li, the young man who confessed to the stabbing — 19-year-old Zhang Xuping — has been sentenced to death for the September 2008 killing, his mother and lawyer said Wednesday. The sentence was quietly handed down last week and an appeal was filed this week, they said.

Zhang Xuping was paid 1,000 yuan ($146) by another villager, 35-year-old farmer Zhang Huping, to commit the murder after Li allegedly harassed the farmer for years, local newspaper reports said. The elder Zhang was reportedly routinely detained on trumped up charges ever since he led a group of farmers to seek the help of provincial authorities after Li razed 28 acres of trees belonging to them without permission or compensation in 2003.

The teenager entered a school where Li was attending a meeting, found the official alone and stabbed him through the heart. Li staggered out of the building and into his luxury sports utility vehicle but died before he could make it to a hospital, reports said.

The case quickly turned into an outpouring of sympathy for the young killer — and expressions of hatred for Li.

Zhang’s trial, which was originally scheduled for August, had to be postponed to late November because thousands of people showed up outside the courthouse wanting to watch the proceedings, news reports said.

Nearly 21,000 people from the area around Xiashuixi petitioned the court for leniency for Zhang — to no avail.

In Xiashuixi, villagers contacted by the AP said that for years they had lived in fear of Li, who they say extorted money and used his influence to have those who resisted him detained or jailed.

Zhang Weixing, 58, said Li illegally seized his land of 3.3 acres and built houses on it three years ago, and he hired thugs to beat him, his wife and children when they tried to stop him.

“When we heard Li Shiming was dead, we felt happy because he did so many evil things and really made us villagers suffer,” said Zhang Weixing, who is unrelated to the family of the accused, by phone. “We all hated him.”

In June, a Chinese woman who fatally stabbed a party official to fend off his demands for sex was freed by a court in a decision that was likely made to avoid a storm of criticism.

During his trial, the defendant apologized to Li’s family, the state-owned Beijing Youth Daily newspaper said. But Li’s eldest son rejected the apology in court and said he hoped judges would sentence his father’s killer to “death by firing squad.”

Li’s death has dealt an immeasurable blow to the family, the son said, adding that his younger brother and sister were unable to focus on their studies and may stop going to school for the time being. Attempts to reach the Li family by phone were unsuccessful, and family members have not publicly addressed the allegations that he was corrupt.

Zhang’s case echoes two other instances of ordinary Chinese who became anti-heroes after killing people in positions of power.

In June, a Chinese woman who fatally stabbed a party official to fend off his demands for sex was freed by a court in a decision that was likely made to avoid a storm of criticism.

But in 2008, Yang Jia, a man who confessed to killing six Shanghai police officers in revenge for allegedly being tortured while interrogated about a possibly stolen bicycle was executed despite an outpouring of sympathy.

Unlike those cases, China’s state media after initially following Zhang’s case did not report his conviction nor his death sentence — a likely indication the government ordered a media blackout.

A Beijing-based lawyer and legal blogger, Liu Xiaoyuan, said the court should have taken public opinion into account given the large number of people who had spoken out in Zhang’s defense.

“If the village secretary had acted illegally and aroused the anger of the mass of villagers, then lenient punishment should have been considered by the court,” Liu said. “It has become the will of people. The death sentence is too heavy.”

The case reflects the desperation that China’s rural poor are driven to when bullied by their leaders, wrote Chinese social commentator Yan Changhai on his blog.

“Zhang Xuping is guilty. His biggest crime is that he dared to resist a bandit-like official, and refused to be obedient and to be a slave,” Yan wrote.

Yan blamed the murder on collusion between officials and local police and courts.

“If the authorities did not indulge Li Shiming’s evil deeds, if even one of his evil deeds was punished by law, he would have avoided death under Zhang Xuping’s knife,” he wrote.

___

Associated Press researchers Xi Yue and Yu Bing contributed to this report.

[About the photo: taken on Aug. 7, 2007, released by Zhang Xuping's family, 19-year-old Zhang Xuping pose for photos outside the Forbidden City in Beijing, China. Zhang became something of a local hero for killing Li Shiming, the hated party secretary of Xiashuixi village, in September 2008. Zhang was sentenced to death last Friday, Jan. 15, 2010, for murder, and an appeal was filed this week, his mother and lawyer said Wednesday, Jan. 20, 2010. (AP Photo/Zhang Xuping's family)]

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

Center for Strategic and International Studies

1800 K Street, NW

Washington, DC 20006

office tel 202.833.2408

office email zb@csis.org

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski

Center for Strategic and International Studies

1800 K Street

Washington, DC





Dear Dr. Brzezinski,



My name is William Dean A. Garner and I’m a NY Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many books. For example, I edited Dan Brown’s The DaVinci Code, among dozens of others. I’m also a former scientist (biophysics), US Army Airborne Ranger (C 1/75 Ranger Regiment), and corporate mercenary for international private military firms I designed and helped build. I did 211 overseas missions in extremely hostile territories over nine years, escorting important people so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and democracy, and a voice against fascism and dictatorial rule. 



Please know that I am building a great case against you and your cartel, something the world will hear, even if you murder me and my family. 



As a Jeffersonian Patriot, I am prepared to do whatever it takes to defend Thomas Jefferson’s great cause, which is the firm establishment and maintenance of Peace, Freedom and Democracy all over this planet.



In my studies over the past 30 years, I have learned much about you and your actions. I also know you and your colleagues are getting desperate.


I am building a great case against you and your cartel, something the world will hear, even if you murder me and my family.


Witness the events over the past nine years: false-flag 9/11 attacks; illegal passing of The Patriot Act; establishment of the Department of Homeland Security, a modern-day Gestapo; establishment of the Transportation Security Administration; false-flag attack by the Detroit bomber, which led to the great push of installing of full-body scanners in airports and which will be introduced in all transportation hubs and ports, plus major centers of public foot traffic.



I’ve studied evolutionary processes on this planet and, therefore, understand and have decoded your moves and actions to establish a socialist/fascist police state in the United States.



I also know that fascist American Wall Street bankers have tried this before: in 1933 and 1934, Wall Street bankers attempted a fascist putsch and tried to overthrow President Franklin D. Roosevelt and also recruit a two-time winner of the Medal of Honor, MG Smedley Darlington Butler, to lead an army of 500,000 soldiers to march on the White House.

It was all a ruse, staged by The First Sphere of Influence, which needed Roosevelt as its presidential pawn. FDR went on to create what is thought of as the most prolific fascist presidency. [Until George W. Bush came into office.]

These Wall Street fascists knew unequivocally that they could never count on General Butler, a Jeffersonian Patriot of the highest order, who subsequently fell into their trap and alerted Congress and ratted out these fascist Wall Street bankers. The “putsch” was a failure, of course, something left off the American history books. It survived several good books, though, and lives in print today, along with the facts surrounding the ruse.



In 1933 and 1934, Wall Street bankers attempted a fascist putsch and tried to overthrow President Franklin D. Roosevelt . . . It was all a ruse, staged by The First Sphere of Influence.

The First Sphere of Influence, which consists of your cartel and the Rothschild banking empire, in the past has operated under a cloak of darkness, and that darkness is now being washed away with the advent of globalization. Ironically, too, the globalization you so crave for will be the detonator of your undoing: word is now spreading among the masses about your cartel. With a little time, enough people will know about you, and the right people–other Jeffersonian Patriots–will rise up against you. Our tools are becoming more prevalent and accessible: the Internet, the Worldwide Web, and the introduction of greater means of communications like Twitter, Facebook, MySpace, email, blogs, websites, etc. Your regime is no longer a black-bag operation that no one knows about, and people like me are now on you like stink on shit and will remain until the members of The First Sphere of Influence wither away.



The Hollywood producer, Irv Thalberg, said on more than one occasion, to the effect: “Writers are the most important part of the filmmaking process, and we must never let them know this.” It was Thalberg’s way of controlling the wages and power of screenwriters during his short reign. When word escaped, screenwriters soon earned hundreds of thousands, if not millions of dollars, for scripts, often surpassing the earnings of actors and some producers.



Likewise, you know that Americans are the most significant and valued part of the entire social and political process, with unlimited power, and you must never let us know it, lest we rise up and drag you and your cartel members back behind the wood pile and execute you. With fascism, one point is abundantly clear, dear sir: it has always fallen and its leaders have always died. Violently, I might add.



Knowledge about you, your cartel and your handlers, the Rothschilds, is spreading and will continue to spread as people finally take note about your nefarious practices. I am personally holding private dinner parties to educate people about you and your cartel, to encourage them to join me in the fight against you and your fascist ways.

LIFE FINDS A WAY, Dr. Brzezinski.



Knowledge about you, your cartel and your handlers, the Rothschilds, is spreading and will continue to spread as people finally take note about your nefarious practices.

Life wants to be free, and you and your cartel cannot contain it. The best you can do is follow my advice: learn about human behavior, neurochemistry, the sociobiology of living creatures. Learn these important subjects so you and your handlers can find ways to use your trillions of dollars and euros and pounds to establish Peace, Freedom and Democracy throughout the world. Your attempts to establish a small colony of slaves on this planet WILL fail.



We’ve already seen that people cannot be contained for too long and that Communism and Socialism do NOT work. LIFE FINDS A WAY TO BE FREE. Your plan WILL fail.



Dr. Brzezinski, all it takes for evil to prevail is for good people like me to do nothing. I feel that with proactive people like me around, evil like you and your cartel will be reduced to your basic atomic components and recycled by the very processes you seek to control or destroy. 



In your next life, I see you as a . . . dung beetle. . . .



Sincerely,



William Dean A. Garner



P.S. To start your re-education, please contact me here: start.here@ghostwriter-editor.biz

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

Others, though, weren’t so impressed.

Let’s look at Zakaria’s background: Yale grad, Harvard political science PhD, member of Brzezinski’s two primary grooming houses for proteges: Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations. In short, Zakaria was shaped by the Brzezinski Cartel to be a subtle voice of fascism. Again, the two mean the same to me: NOT Jeffersonian Democracy, so they can be defined any way and I, like Thomas Jefferson, wouldn’t give a hoot.

Imagine the CEO of Apple Computers, Steve Jobs, addressing the shareholders of Apple stock: “We must stop trying to be number one in the world, and must work toward a more cooperative approach with other companies.”

Zakaria hides in plain sight: he proudly lists his credentials to include the association with Brzezinski’s two governing bodies. He also stated clearly and plainly that America must stop trying to be number one in the world, and must work toward a more cooperative approach with other countries.

Imagine the CEO of Apple Computers, Steve Jobs, addressing the shareholders of Apple stock and stating, “We must stop trying to be number one in the world, and must work toward a more cooperative approach with other companies.”

The shareholder response?

Instant public execution of Steve Jobs.

How is it then that people are so willing to accept such words from a socialist/fascist Zakaria? Because he’s such a pretty man with a big, bright smile, shining eyes, and dripping with charm, not to mention well-practiced eloquence? Or is it that we’re unwilling to challenge him because he’s from the subcontinent of India, whose inhabitants have suffered so through the ages?

All it takes for evil to prevail is for good people to do nothing.

I’m not buying into Zakaria’s words.

And neither should you, unless you’re a socialist/fascist.

The power and reach of Zakaria and other Brzezinski proteges like him are enormous, especially so because their bosses own and control the mass-media magazines and networks where they work and spread the Brzezinski word on socialism/fascism. Actually, socialism is just a sanitized word for the dirty concept of fascism. Political science types will argue vehemently that the two are well distinguished, but I say, “Baloney. They’re one and the same and their end game is the same: oppression of the citizens and all their rights.”

Zakaria was shaped by the Brzezinski Cartel to be a subtle voice of fascism.

Where have we seen this push for fascism before? In his 1935 book, War is a Racket, Smedley D. Butler revealed the failed putsch by Wall Street right-winger Tories to overthrow President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Butler, a highly decorated US Marine who received two Medals of Honor and one Brevet Medal (awarded to officers before the Medal of Honor), was invited by the Wall Street gang to lead a band of 500,000 troops to take over and install a fascist government here in the United States.

These Wall Street fascists knew unequivocally that they could never count on General Butler, a Jeffersonian Patriot of the highest order, who subsequently fell into their trap and alerted Congress and ratted out these fascist Wall Streeters.

At the time, Fortune magazine, still a voice of the Tories, praised fascism at the time, celebrating the regime of Mussolini. The New York Times, forever a voice of socialism/fascism and the Brzezinski Cartel, sported the headline:

General Butler Bares ‘Fascist Plot’
To Seize Government by Force
Says Bond Salesmen, a Representatives of Wall St. Group, Asked
Him to Lead Army of 500,000 in March on Capital–Those
Named Make Angry Denials–Dickstein Gets Charged.

Details about this fascist plot to overthrow a “democratic” government can be found in a number of books: War is a Racket by Smedley D. Butler; 1000 Americans by George Seldes; The Plot to Seize the White House by Jules Archer, among others.

Unfortunately, the “fascist plot” described above was ultimately a ruse, and it had a grander ulterior motive: to further install the true fascist’s puppet, President Franklin D. Roosevelt, more firmly in his seat.

And it worked beautifully. . . .

Zakaria, like his handlers, is a sheep in wolf’s clothing.

Good thing he chooses to hide in plain sight.

Better, too, that there’re REAL wolves among us who can spot him . . . and are eager to engage.

Haggis, anyone?

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

He laments over his continual struggle with other members of the nascent Congress, those frightened souls who conspired to undermine the authority of the newly created United States of America and side with King George and the great Bank of England, which sought to tax the American colonies to death. Paradoxically, yes, to death: if the Bank of England could reduce us to rubble, they then could install a Great Britain, West Bank, populated by dukes, barons and lords of, say, The Great Mexican State of California.

But I’m getting ahead of myself.

How is it that everyone outside the United States is well familiar–to the point of being nauseated–with the imperialism of the United States, while practically no one inside the US has a clue?

It doesn’t take much to control a great country: a few choice leaders at the top, controlling about one hundred loyal dogs, tongues lolling about, who in turn control thousands more in an army or armada of the military, who in turn control the rest of the population.

Sound easy? It is. Hitler did it well for 12 years, from 1933 to 1945, until he and Eva Braun were ferreted out of the country by British intelligence agents.

When the US has taken over another country’s government and installed its own dictatorship, that country’s economy has gone into the toilet, and US transnational corporations have earned billions of dollars a year from blood and dissonance and destruction.

In Latin America, where I did most of my 211 missions as a corporate silladar (read: good mercenary) over a very grueling and extremely dangerous nine-year period, I talked with intellectuals who knew more about American history than I did, which prompted me to read more than I already did–about 10 books a month. I first learned about the US’s awful habit of sending in “economic hitmen” who tried to bribe and threaten reasonably stable governments to take out high-interest loans and agree to impossibly large building projects, all performed by US transnational corporations like Bechtel, e.g. When the economic approach didn’t work, the US sent in the assholes, men who murdered all the right people in that country’s government.

Don’t chastise me for reporting what’s been known and reported in many parts of the world for decades. Don’t bother. I hear it all the time, even from friends who patriotically wave that beautiful American flag to and fro, all the while ignorant of what it actually stands for and who owns it.

When the US has taken over another country’s government and installed its own dictatorship, that country’s economy has gone into the toilet, and US transnational corporations have earned billions of dollars a year from blood and dissonance and destruction. Every single time. There are no exceptions here. None. The US government’s henchmen, the CIA, the State Department and US AID, have destroyed any semblance of democracy in Latin America, and for what?

US transnational companies’ profits. Pure and simple. For the greed of a few Americans.

When I tell this story to people in the US, they treat me like I have incurable leprosy. Yes, it’s hard to swallow, difficult to comprehend. So what’s it going to take for the average US citizen to wake up and realize that all the hatred toward us Americans is for GOOD REASON: our own government has destroyed many countries in this big beautiful world of ours, and has further alienated and marginalized their wonderful people.

They hate us because they think we’re a party to our government’s ill deeds.

They also love us because we live the American Dream. For now.

This is an interesting paradox, this love-hate relationship with us. I call it a relationship, because that’s what they want with us, although they want nothing to do with our government as it is today. Neither do I, so I understand as well as they do.

I didn’t grow up in the United States. My formative years, all 12 of them, were spent in Europe where my first languages were Spanish and German, then English and later Italian. My first memory in life was when I was two years old and walking with my Opa, who at that time was 65 years old and who had survived WW II. On one particular outing, we rounded a corner and ran into a friend of his, a very tall gentleman who looked down on me and said, “Guten tag, Jungen!” He did so with a huge gaping hole in his head: his right eye was missing, displaying only a soft, fleshy cavity that captivated me to no end. I wanted to reach out and put my little finger in this cavity and feel its softness, figure out what made this monster tick.

They yearn to come to America. They fight and kill to come here. They cross borders illegally to come to the US. They pay thousands of dollars and yen and yuan and pesos to board vans and buses and freight cars and junks and ferries to come here.

During my determinative days in Europe, I listened to hundreds of conversations about the US and its foreign policy. It was then that I learned never to read an American newspaper, unless I wished to learn something mundane like whether the Orioles beat the Dodgers. Since I hated all organized sports, I was in no danger of reading such drivel. I also learned that the BBC was a government-run network, that France controlled all its media, and that Italy wasn’t worth reading, even for amusement. The only news worth gathering was from people on the street, people I met and knew and grew up with over 12 years.

The United States has done one thing right: been consistent in its policy. That’s about it, consistency. It has destroyed fledgling democracies in Latin America, shored up the militant state of Israel to kill its Arab neighbors, and ransacked other countries for their wealth and natural resources.

One of my old professors used to say, “If you can’t be good, at least be consistent.”

And the United States’ foreign policy has indeed been consistent.

Now I know what he meant.

And I also understand why they all hate us so much: because we kill their spirit, their leaders, and steal their resources. And then when we’re done with them, we cast them aside like so much chattel.

The flip side: I understand why they love and envy us so, too, because we live in a world that promises and preaches and advertises PEACE, FREEDOM and DEMOCRACY.

They yearn to come to America. They fight and kill to come here. They cross borders illegally to come to the US. They pay thousands of dollars and yen and yuan and pesos to board vans and buses and freight cars and junks and ferries to come here.

Why?

Because we promise Jeffersonian PEACE, FREEDOM and DEMOCRACY, something every human wishes for.

Yet, until we actually practice it, those who have that love-hate relationship with us will still HATE us for promising it to everyone and delivering it to no one.

If Thomas Jefferson were alive to see this debacle today, he would doubtless say, “I told you so, you idiots,” referring to a statement he made about how big banks and their interests would take over the western world and destroy it.

Where are this generation’s Dr. Noam Chomskys when we need them the most?

Playing video games, plumping up on McDonald’s, and stoning to shoe-gazer, thumb-up-your-ass, downer chords on iTunes.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

Jeff Rense, Henry Makow, David Icke, and other fringe reporters of the dirty, nasty, stinking, accurate truth are also guilty.

How could those of us who are disseminating the truth about our government and its handlers be a bad thing?

Simple: we say too much, and it’s absolutely overwhelming to those who were weaned on traditional mass-media news icons like Edward R. Murrow, Walter Cronkite, Peter Jennings, Christiane Amanpour et al.

Alex Jones, who some feel is actually a commercialized pawn of The First Sphere of Influence (Rothschild-Brzezinski), has several websites and each looks like a schizoid version of the National Enquirer. Who in their right mind would ever migrate to such a tabloid? Alex is guilty of sensationalism. It’s meant to be overwhelming and seemingly a negative take on all the things we take for granted about how our government works, and it scares the hell out of us ordinary citizens.

So there must be a way to report on the ill deeds of our government and its handlers, i.e. the Brzezinski Cartel, without frightening the general public, or as Alex Jones does, mislead us.

Unfortunately, most people will discount the dirty, nasty, stinking, accurate truth I write here. It’s just too sensational, unbelievable and, above all, too much too soon.

Good marketers know what I’m talking about: a client has an excellent product or service that is so far outside the mainstream that it appears false. So how to market such an entity? Again, simple: a little at a time to a select few whose girded loins can handle the stress. With time, release a little more info to others, who in turn spread the word to others.

Again, I am guilty as sin for posting sensational pieces about how Zbigniew Brzezinski and his banker-bosses run the world. What good American citizen who was force-fed 9th grade Civics, voted in every election since they were 18, and registered as either a Republican or Democrat would ever consider reading such drivel?

Unfortunately, most people will discount the dirty, nasty, stinking, accurate truth I write here. It’s just too sensational, unbelievable and, above all, too much too soon.

Another confession: I’m not a good marketer. I like to spill it all in one spoonful. And then do it again two seconds later. I may as well dump a truckload of New Truth all over you. Hopefully, someone much much smarter than I will come to our rescue, re-package my information, and then find a better way to disseminate to the general public, so the dirty, nasty, stinking, accurate truth gets out there.

I’m guilty as sin and I apologize for this.

Still, if you’re in a forgiving mood, I kindly ask that you brave the 10X news I offer here. What’s 10X? It’s a neologism that means something like “tens times the normal concentration of something, or something that’s overwhelmingly concentrated or dense.” I ask that you take the time to read these pieces, consider them, let them bounce around your subconscious for a few weeks, then read them again. It takes time to consider concepts that go against the grain of a reality that’s been shoved down our throats since birth. Take your time, please.

And when you get it, please pass it on and help others overcome that initial overwhelming feeling.

Most of us have the right idea: to spread the word about the ill deeds of our government, Zbigniew Brzezinski and the evil family Rothschild, and to ignite a concerted resistance against this insidious change. I fully support anyone for braving the elements and getting the word out. After all, The First Sphere of Influence has murdered at least four US Presidents, plus hundreds of others who crossed them and/or spoke out against them.

I also ask Jeff, Henry, David et al. to consider what I’ve written here and find a way to dole out the bad news to everyone without scaring them off forever.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

In short, the UK’s socialist healthcare system is a dismal failure and provides a glimpse into our own future healthcare in America. The mainstream media do not report on this issue, because they are controlled by an elite power structure that supports a socialist system in this country. What occurs everyday in socialist systems around the world is never likely to appear in US mainstream media.

The last time I was chilled to the bone was the winter of 1996-97 when I was in Ranger School. That near-frozen Georgia humidity shot straight to my spine and, ironically, was the only stimulus that let me know I was still alive. I thought I’d not feel that sensation again. Ever. But I was wrong. This article saddened and chilled me deeply. I hope it chills you, too.

Thank you to Mail Online for giving me permission to reprint the article in its entirety. . . .

Cancer patient kills himself day after he is told NHS Trust would not fund £25,000 drug

By Rebecca Camber
Last updated at 11:04 AM on 25th June 2008

A cancer patient killed himself after being told he had been refused a wonder drug by his local primary care trust.

Albert Baxter, 77, was terminally ill. But he was turned down for a drug which could have prolonged his life and shrunk his tumour.

In desperation, he offered to pay for the treatment. But he was told if he did so, he would also have to foot the bill for the rest of his treatment, which he could not afford.

The former bus driver had been diagnosed with renal cancer in January 2007.

His oncologist, Dr Fiona McKinna told him that the drug Sutent was his only hope. But although she requested the treatment, costing £25,000 a year, in March, East Sussex Downs and Weald Primary Care Trust turned it down on the grounds of cost and clinical effectiveness.

As his condition deteriorated, his clinician launched an appeal – and Mr Baxter hoped that the decision would be overturned.

But when he went to see his consultant on June 5, 2007, she was unable to give him the drug.

Mr Baxter, known by his middle name John, returned to his home in Eastbourne, East Sussex.

The next day, his partner found him dead, with a bin liner over his head. Mr Baxter had not yet found out whether the Trust would consider his appeal.

Yesterday Barrie Curryer, his partner of 30 years, said: ‘What really upset him was that he worked all his life and paid into the health system and was refused treatment.

He thought it was because of his age, which I think played a part too.

‘The trust people just sit in a room and read about John but don’t see the patient. I blame the PCT because John’s oncologist and GP wanted the drug. I think he built up his hopes of getting it.

I don’t think his life would have come to an end precisely when it did had he been prescribed the requested drug. Alan Craze, East Sussex Coroner

The 70-year-old retired nurse added: ‘It was the only drug that could do any good for him, there was nothing else. He was told it would not cure him but would give him a better quality of life.

‘I can’t say he was depressed, just very angry about it. He was so weak and just could not get up the stairs so I had to get people to help me.

‘He said, “Nobody is doing anything for me, they’re just letting me die”.’ I had prepared myself for his death but not under these circumstances.

‘We offered to pay for the drug but if we had done we would have had to pay for all his treatment.

‘We just could not afford that and John would not have accepted that anyway. I just wish he hadn’t done it, we didn’t even say goodbye.’

Friends of the couple, who ran a guesthouse together, organised a petition to get the drug but it failed to move health bosses.

An inquest into his death in April, heard that Mr Baxter’s GP, Dr Rob Wicks, also campaigned for the patient to be prescribed the drug.

He told Eastbourne Coroner’s Court: ‘It would have held the progression of the disease and alleviated symptoms – improving his quality of life.’

But Lisa Compton, of the Trust, told the inquest that clinical effectiveness and cost were the two main reasons for refusing the drug. It was one of just two rejections for the treatment out of 19 requests to the Trust since January 2007.

Recording a verdict of suicide, East Sussex Coroner Alan Craze said: ‘I don’t think his life would have come to an end precisely when it did had he been prescribed the requested drug.’

The Trust had an ‘almost impossible’ job deciding on medication and there had to be a limit on resources, he added.

Sutent, is the first new treatment for advanced forms of kidney disease in 30 years. Trials have shown that it can prolong the lives of those with advanced stages of kidney cancer by up to two years and can shrink the tumour.

It is prescribed throughout Europe and licensed for use here. But it has yet to be approved by the Government’s drugs rationing body, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.

In the meantime, it is up to primary care trusts to decide whether to offer patients the drug, but they are not obliged to do so.

Under Health Service rules patients are not allowed to make so-called co-payments to top up their existing NHS treatment. If they want to pay for drugs not funded on the NHS, they must to pay privately for their entire treatment.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

Whom do the so-called authorities think they’re fooling here, placing a solitary armed soldier amidst holiday travelers? The only people who were impressed with that soldier were old women and 12 year olds. Everyone else smiled at the man as they passed, as if he were standing there in the nude, wearing one of those Buckingham Guard 2-foot-tall bearskin hats.

No one took this guy seriously.

And what if two or three “terrorist types” had assaulted the young soldier and taken his gear? Who would’ve been there to back up the soldier and dispatch the terrorists?

This ridiculous incident brings to mind the activities of one little organization, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). To me, the TSA is too stupid to acknowledge, but I will say a few words here:

TSA security personnel are only effective at keeping us ordinary citizens in line.

In all airports, most TSA officers are armed with 15-shot pistols (okay, maybe a coupla extras), extra magazines packed inside a leather snap-pouch, some pepper spray, and maybe a baton or something else to make them feel safe. Real terrorists and criminals laugh at these guys. They’re easy to overpower. Ordinary citizens don’t assault TSA security personnel because, well, it’s not the polite thing to do. So we scurry past them at security checkpoints, smiling and wishing them Happy New Year and trying to exchange other pleasantries, while the TSA guys secretly hope to run into an international bad guy that will surely cower in fear at their mere presence.

If a seasoned criminal wants to overtake a police officer, it’s easy for him to do so, because the bad guy is brutal and swift and decisive. Ordinary citizens aren’t brutal and swift and decisive, so we’re easy to corral and keep in line. When the terrorist bad guy appears on the scene, though, law enforcement types have their hands full with men who aren’t afraid to shoot to kill. They do it all the time and with good result and minimal effort. Witness: Taleban soldiers easily break through US military defenses and kill soldiers and operatives indiscriminately. And they do it often. Same thing with hard-core criminals in Baltimore and LA and Chicago: when they want to kill someone, they do, including police officers.

TSA security personnel are only effective at keeping us ordinary citizens in line. They’re a poor match for terrorists and other bad guys, who are far better at killing than the well-paid TSA types.

Slightly off the subject, but this is funny: on a recent flight out of Tampa, I witnessed TSA male officers order a beautiful buxom blonde woman to submit to a “pat down” or a full-body scan. The woman smiled and opted for the scan, which revealed to the TSA officers a lovely full-body view normally reserved only for the woman’s spouse. She was very gracious about the whole ordeal, as the TSA security personnel snickered to themselves like 12-year-old schoolboys who’d just peeked up some girl’s dress.

Do you think this type of abuse happens only sporadically?

Back to my message: so why bother to have these TSA personnel around at all, other than to entertain us with idiocy? They create an illusion of safety, which allows the masses (read: you and I) to function well and spend money and pay taxes without living in fear of some terrorist attack.

So maybe the TSA is good for something after all: getting us to function well and spend money and pay taxes.

Too stupid to acknowledge, you ask me, and thank you for the entertainment.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

Excuse me? Accounting change?

If you didn’t get it the first time, here’s another angle: in London, England, the UK government has seized more than $2B in funds that were donated to hospitals in the country, to offset losses by the National Health Service.

In short, the socialist government of the UK has just stolen billions of very hard-earned tax dollars to correct egregious accounting problems by government officials.

I suppose I could say it in other terms, but the outcome will be the same.

Worst of all, it’s about to happen in here in the US. Unless you step up and revolt against this fascist practice of stealing money from citizens. Zbigniew Brzezinski and his boss bankers, The Evil RedShields, have directed Obama to take over the $500B-a-year donations to charity organizations. Or at least a large part of it. The bankers simply want more of your money and they’re going after it in every way possible, including dismantling the most precious form of giving in the world: American Philanthropy.

Mark my word, as others have said it, too: our beautiful country is going the way of a fascist regime. The writing isn’t simply on the wall; it’s on every crumbling road, bridge, sewer system, decrepit runway, dilapidated inner-city neighborhood, and stamped on the foreheads of millions of Americans who are allowing it all to happen.

Having screwed up the national economy, emptied the public purse, dipped into the publics personal pockets, now Gordon and crew are grabbing the charity money the public have raised.
Having abused their trust this Government has set its heart on plundering the charitable trusts.
The funds raised are in memory of loved ones, grateful thanks for care given, or a desire to help those in pain.   –Laurence St. Lyon

The passage of so-called healthcare reform in this country signals a new era in the dismantling of our once-proud democracy. Actually, it began 150 years ago, but the pace has accelerated greatly over the past 10 years. Witness: the Patriot Act. 9/11 attacks. Dubya Bush being sent to the White House by the Supreme Court. A complete and ill-prepared unknown Obama being placed in the Presidency by Brzezinski and his banker bosses. The formation of a Gestapo-like Department of Homeland Security. The progressive stripping of American citizens’ civil rights.

Et cetera.

We’re all too preoccupied with our busy lives to pay any mind to the evils of Brzezinski et al., allowing them to get away with wholesale murder, rape, grand larceny, dismemberment. Who has the time to study the inner workings of these horrible people and their insidious actions? Who could possibly take the time to fully understand the mechanism that powers the fascist machine that’s revving its engines ever louder and higher each day in America?

My wife and I traveled to the UK last week and talked with dozens of Brits, Scots, Germans and a few Americans about how they felt about giving up so much of their income to a socialist/fascist government. Not one single person said they liked the current system. Not one. On any level. Many said they despised having to pay 60% of their income in taxes, then not receive adequate medical care when they needed it. Healthcare in Germany is rationed, just as it is in the UK, and soon will be here in the US. Not a single man, woman or child we talked with had a positive word to say about their government. Not one.

What’s happening in Great Britain will happen in America if we citizens don’t stop it now. All it takes for evil to prevail is for good people to do nothing. Brzezinski and his boss bankers roll the dice every day, banking on the fact that almost all Americans will fall into lockstep with the other socialist/fascist countries they control.

What they aren’t banking on, though, is our love of peace, freedom and democracy.

Bring it on, Brzezinski. We have a surprise for you. . . .

By the way, here’s what 78 Brits had to say about their own government seizing those donations to hospitals (quotes and statistics kindly ripped from the London Times):

Richard Groves wrote:
its an obscenity that people have to jump out of airoplanes and walk the street with collection buckets to supply the NHS with equipment to do the job.
This government is an obscenity of the highest degree sorry lowest
parasite politics thats where we are in the uk today.
December 29, 2009 10:26 PM GMT
RECOMMEND? (16)

Amrit Kaur wrote:
disgusting!
December 29, 2009 9:11 PM GMT
RECOMMEND? (17)

HRD Vincent wrote:
Fair expression Mod’s ?! Come on…
The juxtaposition of insane Nu-Labour’s preferential and reverential treatment of its’ failed and incompetent bankers; and its obvious intention to claw back the banker’s missing money from the British public is utterly and appallingly breathtaking
The fact that they simply do not care that we know, or how we feel about it is just damned insulting.
I’d like to paraphrase a comment made by an American friend of mine, he said: “Most country’s governments are scared of the people; in Britain it seems that the people are scared of the government…”
This is another example of “Nu-Labour-New-Think-new-politik” oppression.
Well people, you have a vote – I really do fervently hope that you use it wisely next time, after all we have a lot to do to fix all of the things that have been broken by these insane people.
December 29, 2009 7:18 PM GMT
RECOMMEND? (23)

Chris Jones wrote:
Much of this was donated in bequests. Grave-robbing about sums up this grasping, lying, shambles of a Government
December 29, 2009 7:15 PM GMT
RECOMMEND? (28)

HRD Vincent wrote:
Come on Mod’s I dare you…
Well people, you have a vote – I really do fervently hope that you use it wisely next time, after all we have a lot to do to fix all of the things that have been broken by these insane people.
December 29, 2009 7:15 PM GMT
RECOMMEND? (9)

Judy Walton wrote:
This money isn’t the governments to ‘manage’. People need to apply pressure, (via their MP’s) on the government to leave this money alone. Either that, or stop contributing to the ‘Labour’ fund.
December 29, 2009 6:59 PM GMT
RECOMMEND? (25)

David Masu wrote:
Nobody has ever seen Gordon Brown and Bernie Madoff in the same room at the same time. Just a thought.
December 29, 2009 6:47 PM GMT
RECOMMEND? (14)

Frank Spence wrote:
Whilst these matters remain as “charities” they fall under the ambit of the Charity Commissioners who regulate and over see their activity. This raises a question for me, if the Government takes control of the charitable donations does that bring the Government under the control of said Charity Commissioners? If the answer is yes who elects them?

This inept, incompetent and dishonest knows no limit to their avarice in terms of getting their hands on other peoples money, any body’s money. People have given these donations for a specific purpose and that purpose was NOT in order that Government should use it as an excuse to cut funding. Donations are in addition to and not instead of Government funding.
December 29, 2009 5:38 PM GMT
RECOMMEND? (25)

Jake Blair wrote:
Imagine you removed all the mangement of our hospitals. Imagine a place where Dr’s, nurses and matrons all ruled the wards. A place where a small team of retired Dr’s could consult on processes, and practices of an entire hospital. Now imagine that same team, benchmarking from each counties own hospitals and specialists. Soon after this first step, I see no reason why it shouldnt flourish.
Ban politics from anything which you want to be productive.
Unfortunatly the electorate, cannot see past one goverment, and put up with the status quo.
December 29, 2009 5:15 PM GMT
RECOMMEND? (15)

Jake Blair wrote:
Theives.
Where it ends up before, will lose.
So you get less budget, and less care.
Sounds like a lose lose.
Sort it out. Privitise the whole thing. Cap their profits. Ensure investment. Some people get rich, but the majority will win.
If we removed the non-uk naitonals abusing our system from the equation, then we wouldnt have to robt he publis contirbutions.
December 29, 2009 5:12 PM GMT
RECOMMEND? (10)

Jake Blair wrote:
If we all paid an itemised bill, and forced parliment not to “cross-lend”, ie: ring fenced contributions, even charity ones, to their dedicated purpose, and subtracted their inflated ego management, then we would have an effcient and productive economy.
Unfortunatly, the desires of politicians, and their extremely poinsonous infectious words, means money intended for one source, ends up in another, at the whim and detrimewnt of another.
Time to bring in itemised bills.
All I ever see is Tax goes up, service goes down. If any company was run this way, they would be bankrupt like this goverment currently is.
Labour and their entourage are amongst other names, highway robbers. Next they will tax the amount of times you go to the toilet. All to what? Fund illegal wars, ID cards, Immigration, Benefits?
Since when do we, the general public have ANY say on how our money is spent?
December 29, 2009 5:04 PM GMT
RECOMMEND? (8)

Colin Smith wrote:
The Government is an irresponsible thieving institution and I would never give any money to any body that it has any influence over. The temptations to steal are too strong for Westminster to resist.
Every day the signs grow clearer that we are a bankrupt country: wait for us to be downgraded from AAA status and see the economic recession become a collapse. People might then, finally, begin to wake up and see just how corrupt all our institutions have become under the cloak of the last thirty years’ false prosperity.
December 29, 2009 4:51 PM GMT
RECOMMEND? (15)

Martin Carter wrote:
To all those who are pointing the finger at the present government, please see my earlier post last night (11.13pm) – it is not just New Labour – all three of the parties are after cash and control one way or another.
I cannot make my mind up whether it is the politicians themselves who are to blame or whether they are just too weak to stand up to the public sector officers.
December 29, 2009 4:37 PM GMT
RECOMMEND? (4)

David Gould wrote:
Haven’t people noticed that the government got its hands on lottery money years ago. It was set up to fund ‘good causes’. I suppose you could claim the government is a ‘good cause’, if you are mad that is.
December 29, 2009 4:27 PM GMT
RECOMMEND? (12)

Laurence St.Lyon wrote:
Having screwed up the national economy, emptied the public purse, dipped into the publics personal pockets, now Gordon and crew are grabbing the charity money the public have raised.
Having abused their trust this Government has set its heart on plundering the charitable trusts.
The funds raised are in memory of loved ones, grateful thanks for care given, or a desire to help those in pain.
Not relieve the Government of it statutory duties or allow it to find more money for ‘initiatives’ that do not show any and ’schemes’, that enrich only those ’schemers’ able to work the system, in a vain attempt to win votes.
December 29, 2009 3:50 PM GMT
RECOMMEND? (15)

A Williams wrote:
I posted a comment earlier which Timesonline chose not to publish. I repeat it here in the hope that they will given that it so clearly demonstrates the value to society of organisations, funded by charitable donations,that would not function without them:
”Yesterday,in my local pub/restaurant, a man collapsed with severe chest pain. An ambulance was called but, within 3 minutes (yes, an incredible 3 minutes) the local “first response” team were on site and had stabilized the man by the time the NHS ambulance arrived some 15 minutes later.
My point being that the first responders who are funded by charitable donations and their own contributions(they have to buy their own vehicles and equipment) would not exist if all funding went into a centralised pot and people would die.
Mr.Brown, keep your grubby fingers out.
December 29, 2009 3:28 PM GMT
RECOMMEND? (20)

Sean Lynch wrote:
This governement is criminal.
They have no right whatsoever to sequestrate money donated by the public.
Please get Labour out, they are Communist tyrants and madder than a box of frogs.
God help us, there will surely be a revolution if Brown fixes the election and gets back in.
December 29, 2009 3:24 PM GMT
RECOMMEND? (12)

E Thompson wrote:
Will this apply to all charities?
If so, I’ll need to change my will substantially too.
December 29, 2009 3:05 PM GMT
RECOMMEND? (10)

neville watson wrote:
For ten years this Socialist Government treated the public purse like a bottomless pit. That created a non sustainable situation even before the onset of the banking crisis, itself caused in no small part by a flawed regulatory system (thank you Mr Brown). We now have an administration bombarded on all sides by calls for yet more public spending when the cupboard is already bare. I see the proposed raid on Hospital Charities as no more than an act of desperation by a Goverment bankrupted through its own misguided policies and afraid to take the necessary remedial action. Remember, the National Lottery pot was also “attached” by this Goverment despite spin claims to the contrary. We need to get back to good basic housekeeping for the public accounts, and this lot are not the ones to achieve it.
December 29, 2009 3:00 PM GMT
RECOMMEND? (16)

E Thompson wrote:
Will this apply to all charities?
If so, I’ll need to change my will substantially too.
December 29, 2009 2:53 PM GMT
RECOMMEND? (7)

D B wrote:
The govt will no doubt take all the donations to the soldiers’ rehab centres out of the budget.
All hospitals should get local newspapers on their side – highlight the donations to particular areas where the govt cuts follow.
December 29, 2009 2:07 PM GMT
RECOMMEND? (12)

Jordan Seymour wrote:
Isn’t a charitable donation to the nhs pretty much a case of the public saying (or voting), we think they need a bigger budget, and the government decides no we’d rather have it regardless of what you think (or would vote, if we had any say on putting policy through). And we live in a democracy?
December 29, 2009 12:40 PM GMT
RECOMMEND? (17)

Jordan Seymour wrote:
How long before we hand money to a friend and it has to go through the state?
December 29, 2009 12:31 PM GMT
RECOMMEND? (20)

max martin wrote:
It would be foolish to think that the government does not already know about the approximate sums of money given to health.
It would be even more naive to think that the government is not already restricting revenue expenditure accordingly.
The State stealing from charity boxes is not new; this will just make the stealing more informed and proportionate.
December 29, 2009 12:28 PM GMT
RECOMMEND? (17)

John Fulwood wrote:
I am speechless. Is this going to be the only counry in the world where the term NGO is meaningless? Non government organistaions that are told how to spend money donated by individuals who want to alleviate suffering outside the tentacles of the state.
December 29, 2009 12:16 PM GMT
RECOMMEND? (24)

Anne Hargreaves wrote:
Like thousands of others I contribute to the cancer charity of MY CHOICE knowing that the money will be used for it’s intended purpose – new equipment,research and improved patient facilities.
This Government has already spent money irresponsibly resulting in debt of obscene proportions. They MUST NOT get their hands on charitable donations!
December 29, 2009 11:57 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (34)

Marie Butler wrote:
People Give money to hospital charities they think need more money. If their money is used to cut funding they will stop paying to charities, and with the lack of earning power causiong real hardship to many who would give they wouldn’t need much excuse to withdraw their support. Next this government will be claiming business tax on charity income. We realy have to vote these out but what are the Tories saying about this?
December 29, 2009 11:08 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (32)

Daniel Earley wrote:
This is exactly what happened with the National Lottery. Labour uses those funds fo its own causes and, suprise, suprise, most of the board of the National Lottery are Labourite ministers or cronies.
So much for charities having independent status.
December 29, 2009 10:57 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (48)

Chantima Chuman wrote:
All hospital charities should withhold any cash until this decision is reversed. This so called government is just despicable.
December 29, 2009 10:56 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (57)


John Moffat-Roberts wrote:
Too much top down decisions, too much centralisation, too much interference, too much regulation, too much blind stupidity… it’s been too much for too long. Oh to be in that England – the land of the free!
December 29, 2009 10:49 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (47)

Louise Brooke wrote:
That’s it – from now on I will ONLY donate my time to charities – NOT money or goods. Labour has had enough of my money, they are not getting any more! How dare they, do they really think that the electorate are that stupid?
December 29, 2009 10:36 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (53)

George Shepherd wrote:
THat’s ok – my donations are stopped as of today.
December 29, 2009 10:31 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (65)

marnie andrew wrote:
people generally give to a specific cause that they feel strongly about, if they can not do that they wont bother to give, i wouldnt. how will they count practical gifts such as toys or heart monitors given directly to a unit
December 29, 2009 10:21 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (29)

James Bowater wrote:
Another way to get their expenses paid .
December 29, 2009 10:16 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (34)

Claire Wright wrote:
My family donate sums to Great Ormond Street Hospital in recognition of the support they gave my sister and her severely sick child. We want that money to help other families in similar situations, not to be used as an excuse to cut money to these institutions following years of excess under a Labour government.
December 29, 2009 9:53 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (74)

John Punshon wrote:
This is exactly what they did with the Lottery money, isn’t it?
December 29, 2009 9:52 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (56)

Paul Wilson wrote:
This is worse than it looks.
The government are talking about consolidated balance sheets, this means they are treating all of the charities assets as their own not just the income. Presumably this will be because the charities concerned can only donate to the NHS and therefore in Labour’s logic the NHS is the beneficial owner of the charities assets. How long will it be before the ‘Charities Commission’ change the rules to allow the beneficiary to dictate trustees when where and how much they give to their beneficiaries.
Bottom line here is that Labour regard ALL assets as belonging to them. You have been warned.
December 29, 2009 9:52 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (59)

David Marsh wrote:
Just as they have done with the National Lottery Labour want to use OUR cash as another stealth tax to plug the holes in Brown’s disasterous economic polices, let’s hope it doesn’t go into Labour marginals to try and boost their standing in those sets before the election…..
December 29, 2009 9:49 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (47)

Ian Dickson wrote:
Politicians are an ugly stain on society. We should get rid of them quickly before they destroy all we hold dear to our hearts. Does anyone over the age of 40 recognise the country we now live in? Thought not.
December 29, 2009 9:44 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (54)

Philip Braine wrote:
You don’t list donations on a balance sheet, silly. You list them in the income and expenditure account. If the Treasury tries to pinch them, however, you probably won’t have to list them at all as people won’t bother.
December 29, 2009 9:13 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (32)

Border Burg wrote:
to refuse to looking for NHS savings is part of the problem
December 29, 2009 9:08 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (25)

Stephen Bishop wrote:
So the cost of the NHS has been understated by £300M per year.
December 29, 2009 8:56 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (31)

David Masu wrote:
My will leaves my estate to Great Ormond Street. As from tomorrow it will not.
December 29, 2009 8:37 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (100)

david skitmore wrote:
Just when we thought Labour can’t sink any lower.
December 29, 2009 8:23 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (114)

Bill Bird wrote:
’ministers take control’ – sounds like an oxymoron to me.
December 29, 2009 8:15 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (57)

Douglas Hendry wrote:
Isn’t it amazing how these people can find ways to squeeze more and more blood from ever-smaller stones?
December 29, 2009 8:01 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (79)

Simon Marshland wrote:
Few charities will trust this spendthrift government with its donations and rightly so. The result of this latest smash and grab attempt will be to deny needed funds to the NHS.
December 29, 2009 7:55 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (76)

mike barton wrote:
soon as i saw “Ministers take control of” my heart sank
December 29, 2009 7:53 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (80)

david skitmore wrote:
Labour have run out of steam, because they have run out of our money.
December 29, 2009 7:45 AM GMT

Terrrence London wrote:
What a sad day for said Charities, their donors, and their intended recipients.
Yet another nail in the coffin of British democracy
Government of the people, by the people, for the Government
December 29, 2009 7:44 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (52)

John Hughes-Wilson wrote:
See Chris’s post at 29 Dec 04.41.
It’s no joke.
Can you imagine an RNLI service run by the government and the Treasury?
It would cost twice as much, be three times as bureaucratic and half as efficient.
However, the Treasury have long considered ways of getting their hands on its money as part of a ‘National Rescue Service’.
Fact: You cannot trust the Treasury with your money, never mind the politicians.
Look at the national Lottery, the big “Voluntary Tax”.
Who taxes, runs and controls its money?
Who uses it to fund things that should be done by government taxmonies?
December 29, 2009 6:59 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (72)

Edward Carroll wrote:
Why are we not surprised?
The destruction of private pensions and increase for MP’s.
The sale of our gold.
The wars, but keeping the troops short of equipment, hospital treatment, and sueing the two wounded men to reduce their payout to less than many government/civil schemes.
The referendum and statement that Lisbon is not the costitution.
A thrice caught minister made a lord and now seems to be running the government.
An unelected prime minister who grabs the limelight but is nowhere to be seen when things go wrong (often).
The claims fiasco and the promises, but then they are nulabour promises.
Immigration.
Finance.
Can you think of any part of our once proud country they have not wrecked?
The list seems endless
December 29, 2009 6:48 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (177)

Chris Palmer wrote:
A few years ago, my local (city) council declared war on all those who live on the streets. This was not only aimed at the feckless, but at the genuinely homeless and ill as well.
The council used its own glossy newspaper style organ of propaganda to instruct us NOT to give money or anything else to beggars but, if we felt moved to do so, to give it to the council who knew far better how to spend this money on the homeless “for their own good”.
Needless to say, I never contribute a penny more to the council than the council tax I am legally bound to pay. I continue to ignore the feckless, as I always did, and I now indulge in spontaneous acts of underhand charity towards those others who ask me, or sometimes who don’t.
If the government get their grubby hands on charitable offerings to the NHS, I shall simply find another way to give, or another deserving cause to give to.
As Jenny Willot said, “The Government has no right to get its hands on any charitable NHS funds”. And that should be the end of the matter.
December 29, 2009 6:07 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (82)

Stephen Baker wrote:
Gormless Gordon strikes again.
Yet more underhand, mean-spirited sleight of hand by this appalling Government.
Not exactly a vote winner, is it?
December 29, 2009 5:45 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (126)

A G wrote:
It is my understanding that the charities concerned are there to provide benefits to patients that the NHS lamentably neglect to fund.Usually, these benefits are specific aimed to improve the quality of life of patients who are suffering from serious conditions or to acquire particular equipment that the NHS will not fund.
This reprehensible act will undoubtedly result in people reconsidering their position leading to a reduction in donations. In the past have given to one Cancer related organisation but it will not happen again.
December 29, 2009 5:38 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (51)

Man in The Street wrote:
When will politicians learn to keep their grubby hands of other peoples cash?
I’m sick of all of them, revolution anybody?
December 29, 2009 5:30 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (71)

Stephen Hollinshead wrote:
If it’s no longer a charity and just going into the the hospital budget then people will stop giving money simple as that. People are quite willing to donate to buy extra equipment for their local hospital, but if they even begin to think it is going to be used to pay for basic things like wages then the donations will dry up very quickly. Will people donate again if money donated for say a scanner appeal is diverted to fund something else, once trust is gone it is very hard to regain it.
December 29, 2009 5:04 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (62)

CHRIS xxxx wrote:
There is no limit to how low Labour will go. Now they are after charitable donations. What next? The Red Cross, RNLI?
Gordon: Call the election now so we can end your attrocious prime ministership.
December 29, 2009 4:41 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (81)

Robert Elliott wrote:
So, not content with taxing us all to death, Znanulabour now want to incorporate charitable donations into the Treasury pot. This government is below contempt. When will all those spineless backbenchers represent their electorate anc call for no confidence.
We are gradually heading towards a soviet style dictatorship, with Gordy the contriol freak at its head. Enough is enough. They have to go, they are fundamentally dishonest.
December 29, 2009 2:34 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (88)

Geoffrey Johns wrote:
so new labour squeezes its mucky paw into your pockets yet again
December 29, 2009 2:13 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (65)

Trudi Morris wrote:
It’s just another cash grab – it’s not the first and won’t be the last.
It’s why our ancient regiments are largely gone: so the government could empty the accounts. Old soldiers bequeathed monies marched quickstep to the Treasury. Labour will stoop at nothing.
December 29, 2009 1:39 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (67)

Bob Evans wrote:
Just another way for Government–The State–to discourage individual charitable giving. One only need think of the charitable nature of the British people a century ago, and how it has been diminished. In neutralizing and eliminating charitable giving, Government makes everyone even more dependent upon the hydra-headed monster we know as The State.
December 29, 2009 1:22 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (61)

Sue Birmingham wrote:
All it needs is a campaign to set up new charities where the trustees aren’t the directors of the relevant NHS trusts, and the money will be safely back in independent hands.
December 29, 2009 12:48 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (40)

Simon Newbold wrote:
Just when you think that this appalling Government has sunk to the nadir of its policies, it can come up with an idea such as this.
What depths can they possibly sink to next???
December 29, 2009 12:41 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (142)

paul dee wrote:
The irony is that the people who came up with this wheeze almost certainly are covered by private health plans. Trim the cost of the health service for the hoi polloi is presumably their aim.
December 29, 2009 12:29 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (47)

KW Cook wrote:
Forgive my cynicism, but why is everyone showing such surprise? What do we expect from these “Honourable” politicians?
I hope to God they keep their avaricious hands off the RNLI, if they find it irresistible, I advise you all not to venture unto the sea in ships, you might adversely affect NuLab’s precious targets.
December 29, 2009 12:26 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (69)

David Ross wrote:
So, who still doesn’t believe that we now live in a communist police state?
December 29, 2009 12:16 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (208)

peter codner wrote:
I’d love to know the name of moron who came up with that “courageous” idea
December 29, 2009 12:14 AM GMT
RECOMMEND? (53)

Geoff Miller wrote:
People should stop giving donations to the NHS anyway. They are not responsible enough with money – there are too many managers and not enough front line staff, money is wasted all over and all the decisions are made by an unaccountable board of directors rather than by the doctors and nurses. The whole service needs a shake up.
December 28, 2009 11:22 PM GMT
RECOMMEND? (130)

Martin Carter wrote:
This isn’t the only example of ‘nationalising’ the independent / charitable sector.
In Tory/LibDem controlled Leeds, several of the theatres – including the Grand and City Varieties – were set up as independent companies so they could benefit from lottery funding and grants which the Council could not othewise have obtained. No sooner have all the grants and refurbishments been completed than the Council has effectively moved back in and taken control of them, appointing one of its leisure services officers as Director of Theatres.
I now deeply regret having donated any money to them for refurbishment.
December 28, 2009 11:13 PM GMT
RECOMMEND? (76)

Phil Dunderdale wrote:
I suppose the government think people will not notice? Next the money from Children in Need will be used to pay for income support and the Poppy Appeal will be used to wage silly wars. In fact soon they wrap up all charity donations and call them HMRC donations.
December 28, 2009 11:09 PM GMT
RECOMMEND? (140)

Peter Sharpe wrote:
I think this a storm in a tea cup. The change accounting treatment of these items will have no impact on the facts
on the ground for the charities. Secondly, it wasn’t the Department of Health’s choice, the Treasury chose to adopt the new accounting standards and the DH’s scope for interpretation if the standard is limited.
I think the Charities Commission has got it’s knickers in a twist over nothing about this. In Accounting 101 you learn about substance of legal form.
December 28, 2009 11:04 PM GMT
RECOMMEND? (5)

Andy Davis wrote:
When you have a socialist government you expect corruption, you expect incompetence, you expect style over substance, you expect patronage, you expect attacks on basic freedoms but even so this government still manages to surprise me with its basic lack of moral values.
December 28, 2009 11:02 PM GMT
RECOMMEND? (247)

Christopher Stubbs wrote:
Mmmm, politicians with their fingers in the kids piggy bank eh? Whatever next?
December 28, 2009 10:58 PM GMT
RECOMMEND? (160)

ta NKY wrote:
so people arent going to be given to specific causes, they are just going to give it to the great and glorious £100 billion nhs.
December 28, 2009 10:53 PM GMT
RECOMMEND? (54)

jayil london wrote:
In other words – Laws are made to be broken. Where do we the people start?
December 28, 2009 10:52 PM GMT
RECOMMEND? (80)

Hugh Davies wrote:
Never forget, politicians believe that everything belongs to them. And this is just another example.
December 28, 2009 10:40 PM GMT
RECOMMEND? (191)

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

Everything. Especially since this man, Zbigniew Brzezinski, represents the largest banking family on the planet: The Evil Family Rothschild.

If you’ve just been provoked into a hissy fit, ready to pull out your 9th-grade civics text book, don’t bother: most of it is as inaccurate as it could be, and for good reason.

Our country isn’t a democracy, and it hasn’t been for more than 150 years. That’s not hypothesis, it’s not theory, and it’s certainly not conjecture: it’s absolute fact. That’s why I simply state it and put it out there for you to stir around in the soup between your ears. If you get mad enough or frightened beyond the norm, then maybe you’ll tell others.

My aim is to spread the word about how the world really works, and to do so before I die a natural death or am murdered by the Rothschild’s henchmen. Yes, they’ve dispatched thousands of others over the past several hundred years, those would-be whistleblowers. Thing is, we live in an era of flash media and viral marketing, so anything I write here will be seen by many and it will not be lost when I’m gone.

My aim is to spread the word about how the world really works, and to do so before I die a natural death or am murdered by the Rothschild’s henchmen.

Brzezinski is merely the Family Rothschild’s errand boy, carrying out the dirty little wars that garner billions for the RedShields’ empire. Rot in German is RED; Schild in German is SHIELD. Hence my using the seemingly derogatory Americanized term, RedShield. It also smacks of old Soviet oppression. Fitting description for a family that seeks to turn the US into another socialist-communist country, and enslaving its people.

By now, you’ve tuned out this article and gone on to other mundane things around the house. Those of you who are still with me should consider the facts above, let them stew inside your subconscious for a few days or weeks, then write your “elected” representatives and let them know YOU now know how this system works and you’re not gonna let some socialist-communists, the RedShields, run this beautiful country of ours into the ground any further than they already have.

With viral spread of the good word, it is now possible to launch the truth. A hundred years ago, the RedShields counted on relative anonymity to carry out their dirty work. While we may not have complete transparency, the old barriers that prevented us commoners from understanding the true nature of the systems of government in the western world are falling, if only slowly and against a great inertia–that of indifference.

Remember: all it takes for evil (The RedShields) to prevail is for good people (YOU) to do nothing.

Again, this country of ours is NOT a democracy. Yes, you may feel like you have the freedom to move here and there without showing your papers to the border guards, but underneath this sheen of Thomas Jefferson’s freedom and democracy is an insidious beast that thrives on oppression of its own people. I don’t care whether it is socialism or communism or whatever, the fact is that it is NOT a democracy. Our so-called income tax is illegal. There is NO law on the books, stating that American citizens must pay an income tax on their personal earnings. There are laws that direct corporations to pay corporate tax, yes. There are laws that direct citizens to pay capital gains taxes, yes. But there is NO law that directs us to pay taxes on our income. None. Period. All our income taxes go to the Federal Reserve, which is NOT a US government institution. It’s owned by the RedShields. A large portion of our hard-earned income goes to a family of socialist-communist thugs who rule the entire western world.

As a child, I was promised freedom and democracy. It’s hardwired into my DNA. Try to take it from me and I’ll do whatever it takes to stop you. If the RedShields and their man Brzezinski think they’re going to convert people like me–and hopefully you, too–into little socialists or communists, they’re mistaken. Based on evolutionary chemistry, there WILL be an uprising against the RedShields, and they will not recover from it. Question is, when will this happen? The way things look now, it will be in the next 25 years and I pray I have a big hand in it.

And this brings me to the subject of this article: healthcare reform in America. For one, the so-called reform is a sham. It’s not about healthcare; it is about reform. Reforming the United States into a fascist state. It’s all about control, using healthcare reform as a vehicle. Thing is, The First Sphere of Influence–Rothschilds and Brzezinski–didn’t count on such a backlash from the citizens of this country.

Ah, enough.

For one moment, let’s just say there may be a legitimate attempt to bring better healthcare to the citizens of this country. There is no real healthcare reform in a democracy (or constitutional republic) without debates at the grassroots level, then building a consensus and passing on that result to elected officials who, in turn, vote on it properly according to the will of the people. According to YOU. According to ME.

The so-called “passing” of these bills in the House and Senate is an absolute joke. These “elected” officials should be banished to the Antarctic, to turn glaciers into igloos for tourons.

Not a single member of Congress or the Senate has stood up and publicly opposed this healthcare legislation, because it is a foregone conclusion: oppressing the rights of the people and bringing them under yet another unnecessary rule of a government that is becoming more and more oppressive each day. In Germany in the 1930s, healthcare was rationed out only to those who were deemed important to the state, those who were young and healthy and contributing to the Nazi regime. In the US today, healthcare reform will do exactly the same thing: withhold healthcare from those who are deemed not important to the socialist-communist system, those who aren’t young and healthy and contributing directly to the regime.

In my lifetime, I’ve seen The Big Push where Brzezinski, at the behest of his handlers The RedShields, have made a big push to oppress the rights of all Americans. The Patriot Act is a glaring example, stripping the rights of all citizens. For example, I could be arrested and carted off to a federal prison (not local jail) without a formal charge, and my wife would never have access to me, nor would my attorney. I could be branded an anarchist or dissident or enemy of the state.

While you were enjoying the freedoms that Thomas Jefferson dreamed of, fought for, and penned in the most important documents this world has ever seen, the RedShields were boiling you alive, one slow degree at a time.

The Department of Homeland Security is modeled directly after the Nazi’s Gestapo. It’s only the beginning now, but we’ll see these modern-day Nazis more and more, and they’ll be violating our civil rights more and more, too. Agents from Homeland Security can come into YOUR home and search it without warrant any time of the day or night. And they can arrest YOU and place you in a federal holding facility indefinitely. You could be labeled an enemy combatant (a bit of a stretch, yes) and therefore be stripped of ALL your constitutional rights. The grand experiment for this is the US military prison at Guantanamo, where “enemy combatants” have been held for years without access to legal counsel or their families. All under the Patriot Act, these non-democratic actions are simply little experiments to see how the public reacts. And so far, we’ve allowed them to get away with stripping the rights of prisoners, redefining The Geneva Conventions. Oh, excuse me: I meant, ignoring wholesale The Geneva Conventions.

And where were YOU while all this was going on? Watching the latest movie on DVD, going bowling with your spouse, crossing US borders to vacation at the beach, enjoying a Thanksgiving dinner with family and friends.

While you were enjoying the freedoms that Thomas Jefferson dreamed of, fought for, penned the most important and influential documents this world has ever seen, the RedShields were boiling you alive, one slow degree at a time.

One has to wonder why the RedShields would be pushing so hard these days to form a socialist-communist one-world government in such a hurry. They almost seem desperate. This last happened in the western world in 1933 when they took over Germany, using Adolf Hitler as their puppet, and destroyed any semblance of established order, instituted their own order, formed terribly oppressive organizations like the Gestapo, turned all Germany’s citizens in to slaves of his regime, and ruled until 1945 when he was secreted away by the father of James Bond, Ian Fleming, and Rothschild cohorts.

The RedShields pit one country against another or others in horrible battles, funding both or all sides, and reaping the bloodstained benefits from it all. The pattern continues to this day . . . in Afghanistan and Iraq, not to mention the hundreds of other internecine battles throughout the world.

I could go on and on and perhaps will someday . . . in a book that chronicles the rise and fall of the RedShields.

All it takes for evil to prevail is for good people to do nothing. In the name of peace, freedom and democracy (or a constitutional republic), I will fight The Evil Family RedShield until I die or am murdered by the RedShield’s henchmen.

What are YOU willing to do to to restore and then preserve peace, freedom and democracy?

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

Also, please don’t tell the Blues that maintaining bloodlines without sufficient infusion of new genetic material leads to amplified mutations that, in turn, make for a mushy brain. The French poodle is a prime example. Historian Philip Warner points out:

Modern dogs are a poor copy of their sturdier ancestors, and many an animal that was once in the forefront of the chase has now been turned by the breeders into a wretched specimen which can hardly hold a sugared biscuit in its mouth without dropping it.

Today’s subspecies of poodle can’t tell the difference between a duck and a Toyota.

Old World poodles were water-loving dogs.

Today’s poodles splash about in mud puddles.

Old World poodles had high levels of intelligence.

The modern French poodle can’t even speak its own language.

The poodle of old were heavily trained to be retrievers of shot birds.

Today’s subspecies of poodle can’t tell the difference between a duck and a Toyota.

And so we’re back to our discussion of bloodlines of the elite: which would you rather have, the achingly low IQ of a Dubya . . . or the high, thinking intelligence of some hardworking woman from deepest, darkest Kansas, whose genetic mix consists of tidbits of African, Mexican, Scottish, Irish, German and Whatsit?

Diversity ensures not only survival of the species but evolution into a higher being. The Bush, Obama, Bzrezinski, Rothschild and other families have become so inbred that they can’t tell the difference between a duck and a Toyota.

Viva la Bloodline, indeed. . . .

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonfiction books. A former biophysicist, US Army Airborne Ranger, and Corporate Mercenary, Garner did 211 overseas missions over a nine-year period, escorting clients out of hostile territories so they could have a voice of peace, freedom and liberty. He writes and speaks about the dangers of The First Sphere of Influence, a global cartel controlled by the family Rothschild.

Decommissioned US Navy F/A-18 Hornet for sale.

Drowning in the throes of a mid-life crisis? Then this baby will rocket you out of those blues and into a whole different kinda wild blue!

Guaranteed chick magnet! Take your prospective hottie on the roller coaster ride of her life. I tell ya, this bird is the best foreplay ever: forget the expensive movie, dinner, dancing and creme brulee, and strap on 17 tons of otherworldly beast and scream around those diaphanous blue skies at Mach 2. If her pants aren’t down around her ankles after that first 6-G turn, then light the burners and slam the G into the red zone.

If you’re not into babes, then this is perfect for home protection! Take off from your street, climb to altitude, see all potential threats before they reach your home, then blast ‘em all to North Carolina. Landing’s easy: just set up an arresting wire across the street in front of your house, fold up the wings, then taxi right into your garage.

Excellent condition:
-Garaged for past two years
-Street legal in DC, Maryland and Virginia
-Odometer with less than 1,000,000 miles
-Zero to sixty in 10 milliseconds
-Only 525 cat-traps (catapult take-offs and carrier landings)
-Never been shot down
-36 bullet holes in fuselage and right wing have been fully repaired
-Original body, paint
-New tires
-Good shocks
-Serviceable tailhook
-Rebuilt motor
-Factory-new afterburner
-Certified GOOD TO GO Aces II Ejection Seat
-Full avionics Sport Package with Heads-up Display and surround-sound Dolby stereo system
-Gentex flight helmet, G-suit and flight gear
-Flew 100 missions over Iraq in 1990-91; TOPGUN in 1992-93
-Optional accessories: bombs, bullets, missiles and the brain that goes in the cockpit
-Does not include wingman or fuel
-Batteries not included
-Some assembly required

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: William Dean A. Garner is a New York Times bestselling ghostwriter and editor of many fiction and nonficti